The few rule the masses.
The general public does what Simon says, why? The rich dictate what the middle class does and the poor does it. The real power lays in the masses and they never use it. If people work as hard as they do to get out of work, mountains could be moved. Follow blind what others tell you to do, it is the American way. A law stating everyone should jump off a bridge, would do America wonders. The end to the middle class or close to it. Those that didn't jump would be those few that actual have a brain.
Time for a revolution
Side Score: 18
|
![]() |
So
Side Score: 16
|
|
Interesting how you set up the debate so that your argument in the beginning is truth and we have to say whether we should do something about it or not. No, the rich do not tell us (the Middle Class) what to do. I vote based on my opinions only. Do they have influence? Of course. They run the media and hollywood, which some people worship (how do you think Obama got elected in the first place?) But to suggest that the rich are actually ruling the world is typical teenage rebellion nonsense. If this is true, than they actually deserve it for being the only smart people in this world. If people really are that stupid to just let the rich tell them what to do, than they deserve to be mindless puppets. But this isn't the case. We are individuals and we have plenty of people who want to "stick it to the man". The others just don't care at all what the rich say. Only a couple are actually influenced, and they're actually the very people who get into the revolutionary trend in the first place. The idea of revolution and going against the mainstream is a ploy by the Corporations themselves. Corporations love taking advantage of trend clinging teens, examples: Going Green - Corporations sell a bunch of green products while also advertising how their product uses less plastic. Less plastic means less money spent. More people will buy that product because they think they're saving the Earth, increasing profit a shit load. Rebellion - Hot Topic, the music industry, etc. This is too easy, anyone who doesn't understand this one is retarded. Rebellion is a corporate scheme. and so on and so forth. The only reason why I voted here is because I believe in Aristotle's view on Democracy. A nation ruled by the Middle Class. Fuck the Lower and Higher Classes, they will most likely vote selfishly. The Middle Class is most likely (not guaranteed of course) to vote for what's best for the country. 78 days ago | Tagged As: Time for a revolution
The rich tell you what to do from the time you get up in the morning until you go to bed at night. This has been done everyday since the first gov't was put in place. Here in the USA, it started with the constitution. It was drawn up by wealthy business people in order for them to increase their own wealth. No poor man has ever had a say in anything. "A poor man wise is like a book never read. To himself, he lives. To all others seems dead. This age thinks more of a gilded fool than a thread bare saint in wisdom's school." Thomas Dekker lived from 1572-1632 You vote based on your opinions of a rich man, there are no poor politicians. Change is not just a teenage thing; it also comes from one that sees things as they are, not as they think it is. Corporations make sure they benefit from any situation. The reason they give money to both parties; a win,win for them. According to Winston Churchill it is all voters that you should stay clear of. "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter." 77 days ago | Tagged As: Time for a revolution
Ah, since the rich people happen to know how to play the game, this means the rich are making ALL decisions for us. Here's the problem, there are different parties with different views. Now, if you're against parties working together (to encourage different views) than you should be happy now, because the Democrats and Republicans are not getting along at all. Once again, it's just teenage rebellion. Rich people aren't controlling us, it's our votes. 77 days ago | Tagged As: Time for a revolution
"Here in the USA, it started with the constitution. It was drawn up by wealthy business people in order for them to increase their own wealth." Wealthy business owners didn't exist at that time. Thomas Jefferson, one of the framers, was a political philosopher that believed America was a nation of farmers... He wasn't particularly wealthy either, his father was a planter/surveyor. How does this equate to a wealthy business man? "A poor man wise is like a book never read. To himself, he lives. To all others seems dead. This age thinks more of a gilded fool than a thread bare saint in wisdom's school." Thomas Dekker lived from 1572-1632 Thomas Dekker, meet Post-Modernism. 73 days ago | Tagged As: So
Going Green - Corporations sell a bunch of green products while also advertising how their product uses less plastic. Less plastic means less money spent. More people will buy that product because they think they're saving the Earth, increasing profit a shit load The biggest corporations in the world are oil, electric, and automotive... your example would be one of the "corporations" not "increasing profit a shit load." And what proof do you have Obama was only elected because of the media? Obama bought media time with money donated from individuals in a higher proportion than any president in modern history. And Faux, as the noisy minority loves to boast, is the most watched news media in the world... and they certainly have no love for Obama. So again, you seem very confused by the entire thing. I'm all for revolution. Problem is, we have leadership with a majority approval rating for the first time since about 2002, (and that brief approval spike was due completely to tragedy) and now the right wants a rebellion. Odd timing. Hot Topic? Really? How many tea-baggers you think shop at Hot Topic. I find your view on this very backwards and confusing. 76 days ago | Tagged As: So
1. Exon and General Electric are all getting in on this Green mentality. But even so, most other big businesses have been doing it for quite some time. 2. Fox let Obama buy out all their ad space. Fox is about profit, not ideology. 3. Hot Topic refers to typical teenage rebellion (fight the system and the man, typical bullshit). Tea Party protesters are new to rebellion, they're doing it for belief, not for the image. I figured this would all be a lot easier to understand... but I guess not, for some. 76 days ago | Tagged As: Time for a revolution
Viva la revolution! No I'm serious. It's a civic fucking duty to participate in revolution if our government becomes corrupt. If it gets to the point where I'm in a bread riot, I'll turn this country on its ass and burn it to the ground. I'm pretty sure the founding fathers would agree that it's the right thing to do. Yeah, I guess I'd be a terrorist, but I'd rather call myself a very violent activist. Edit: Though, I have to agree with pyg. The rich don't rule the country. At least, not yet. I don't think they will for a very long time either. 77 days ago | Tagged As: Time for a revolution
Why? Because people are too caught up in their lifestyles to care. Although a few may have most of the power, people are pretty happy. They get access to basically anything they want for a reasonable price. A revolution can only occur when people are dissatisfied. And I'd venture to say that most people don't recognize the extent to which this statement is true, or a few more might care in spite of the comforts society currently affords. 78 days ago | Tagged As: Time for a revolution
People have parents for a reason...to grow...biologicle factors in effect there should be no reason why anything should have fear...via y= 2012 - X=1987 = 25 in math a hyper cube as five demsions incopreating the 5th so...if the world is round why is it flat at the same time....theres no reason the average person in this day and age shouldent have the proper natural will to deciver life in a interstellar reality...in point i ask teh question why dont we? 73 days ago | Tagged As: Time for a revolution
|
Unions back politicians all the time so if unions are allowed to fund politicians then why should companies be banned from doing so? To say that they are owned by lobbyists is a bit extreme, especially seeing how progressive legislation to help the people are passed all the time. I would be naive to think that politicians care only about the people who elected them, but at the same time I can say for certain that things are better today then they were 100 years ago and that is partly because of laws passed by politicians. 77 days ago | Tagged As: So
"... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, ..." ~ Declaration of Independence, 1776 77 days ago | Tagged As: So
Assuming this is true, doesn't the poor agree to this policy? In America everyone is given the chance to turn in applications, to educate themselves... it's up to you, if you're poor, to get a job, support yourself, get an education and move up. You have to prove yourself in America, you can't just abolish class and hope everything will work out. Also, there is a fair distribution of responsibilities and suffering across every class, the human condition guarantees it. Which set of suffering and responsibility do you want? If you want to know that there will always be food on your table, indefinitely, rise from the lower class, if you then want to know that you can never be fired from your job, rise from the lower middle class, to the upper middle class, and build your own business or infiltrate the ranks of an existing business... if then you want to ensure everything in your life will be perfect, and you want to change the world, rise from the upper middle class and join the ruling class, but in doing this you'll probably have to become an immoral person (If you already aren't one). The lower class doesn't deal with any of the responsibility of the middle or ruling class, so in a way they have it easy, and this can be said about any class. One class deals with one form of stress or responsibility, the other deals with a different kind. No one is really holding the lower class down, they do that themselves. This is something that Plato touches on in the Republic, here's a quick summary: "For one thing, if the ruling party mistakenly legislates to its own disadvantage, justice will require the rest of us to perform the (apparently) contradictory feat of both doing what they decree and also doing what is best for them. More significantly, Socrates argues that the best ruler must always be someone who knows how to rule, someone who understands ruling as a craft. But since crafts of any sort invariably aim to produce some external goal, good practitioners of each craft always act for the sake of that goal, never in their own interest alone. Thus, good rulers, like good shepherds, must try to do what is best for those who have been entrusted to them, rather than seeking their own welfare." -Link 73 days ago | Tagged As: So
|





