#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
The number one 9/11 truth video.
Whoa bro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Side Score: 13
|
 |
Head in the sand.
Side Score: 13
|
|
Side: Whoa bro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
2
points
Well, the first problem I have with the video is that anyone who watches it and believes it refuses to discuss the actual parts of the video that they think are compelling. As long as you are skeptical at all about the video the video seems to have no power. Second, it raises doubts but never confirms those doubts. Everything coincidentally fits together, but there is no paper trail back to the government. It says something could happen and indicates that it is more likely, but there is nothing written down by government officials, no witnesses who were involved, nobody who planted explosives, etc. We can't even keep a scandal about the secret service with prostitutes a secret. Third, the coincidences are all based on misdirection. Experts who say that the attack looked like something else they have seen, so it can't be the government explanation. No one recreated the actual conditions seen in the attack. For example: let's say you have 2 pitchers Trevor and Ricky. I show you a video of a fastball and claim it is thrown by Trevor. Let's say someone else comes around and says that the throw looks like it was Ricky. Then, they show you videos of Ricky throwing a pitch and it looks the same. That doesn't prove anything. That could just mean that the video I have of Trevor makes him look like Ricky. In order to demonstrate that I was wrong you would have to get Trevor to throw another pitch and show that when Trevor throws a pitch he looks nothing like Ricky. This conspiracy video does things backwards. Side: Whoa bro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
point
1
point
Actually there is no real evidence that the NIST report is true. There is a great deal of evidence that disproves much of the NIST report. 2500 independent engineers, architects, and demolition experts have proven that the NIST report is false which indicates some government involvement. If you research the subject thoroughly you will find more evidence of government involvement than evidence backing up the 911 report theory. Side: Whoa bro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
point
That is why there are 2500 of them with many different backgrounds that have studied what happens to high rise buildings during fires and explosions. The truth movement has videos on Youtube if you watch them it becomes clear that the NIST report's account of events is not physically possible here on earth. The laws of physics don't allow for their scenario to be the truth. They don't claim to have the exact answer but they are in search of the truth. Hence the name. Side: Whoa bro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is why there are 2500 of them with many different backgrounds that have studied what happens to high rise buildings during fires and explosions. If the towers didn't fall due to fire or explosion, then all of their experience is worthless. They say it looked like something they are familiar with. That doesn't rule out it being something else they aren't familiar with. For example: let's say you have 2 pitchers Trevor and Ricky. I show you a video of a fastball and claim it is thrown by Trevor. Let's say someone else comes around and says that the throw looks like it was Ricky. Then, they show you videos of Ricky throwing a pitch and it looks the same. That doesn't prove anything. That could just mean that the video I have of Trevor makes him look like Ricky. In order to demonstrate that I was wrong you would have to get Trevor to throw another pitch and show that when Trevor throws a pitch he looks nothing like Ricky. This conspiracy video does things backwards. The truth movement has videos on Youtube if you watch them it becomes clear that the NIST report's account of events is not physically possible here on earth. I have never seen a single video where they recreated to actual conditions of that day. That's how you show something is physically impossible. The laws of physics don't allow for their scenario to be the truth. Actually, they do. If you look at the actual laws of physics and not just the speculation. They don't claim to have the exact answer but they are in search of the truth. Hence the name. They aren't in search of the truth though. They are in search for an alternative story. If it was a demolition project why is there no evidence of a demolition. Where are the people who wired up the buildings? Where are the people who set off the explosions? Where are the receipts for the explosives used? Where are the people who sold the explosives? Side: Whoa bro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
