CreateDebate


Debate Info

28
9
True Wait..., what? No!
Debate Score:37
Arguments:21
Total Votes:46
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True (13)
 
 Wait..., what? No! (6)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40163) pic



The problem with people here is that I'm typing in English & they are reading in dumb ass

True

Side Score: 28
VS.

Wait..., what? No!

Side Score: 9

I don't know how to fix the problem ;)

Side: True
1 point

That's a good point, I often wonder why reading and comprehension don't go together well here. One doesn't necessarily lead to the other, it seems.

Side: True

People read what they want to read, not what's written ;)

Side: True
0 points

You, joecavalry, are part of the problem. You are basically third place in the scale of the most shallow poster of the website; in First Place is Outlaw and in Second Place is Brontoraptor. The place is not based on who literally is the most shallow but who is OFTEN AND CONSISTENTLY shallow in posting, blatantly wanting to get a giggle, a site-point and a rise out of the opponent rather than a possible motive relating to debating and/or understanding ideas.

Side: Wait..., what? No!

And if I have ever made you smile, then my job here is done ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!
1 point

And if I have ever made you smile, then my job here is done

Does it still count if he was touching himself at the time?

Side: True
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

LMMFAO !!!!!!! The Little Demorat SnowFlake has it's self a problem !!!!! We have moved away from Points and Efficiency to Site Points now ! Dummy u obsess much ??????

Side: True
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

The SnowFlake has found it a motive now and that is Shallow Posting!! We can forget about Points , Efficiency and Site Points now. Are you out of diapers yet you Little Baby ?

Side: True