The rich BRIBE.. The poor use AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. What's better?
Bribing is the American way
Side Score: 7
|
One is legal. One isn't.
Side Score: 8
|
|
|
|
It's not so much a question of which is better, but more, which is the more effective. If you want to acquire something, let's say a major contract, a carefully planned bribe will secure you the business. When I say carefully Planned I mean you must, through a well thought out, pre-bribe plan, and by using your experience establish whether or not the decision maker is sufficiently corrupt/greedy to be lured into the bribe. Trying to bribe a bible thumping, moralistic puritan could, and probably would result in you losing the contract and having your company removed from the select tender list for all future contracts. Such is the world of business. Side: Bribing is the American way
|
1
point
The rich BRIBE.. Yes. We are familiar with how libs in power get paid. The poor use AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. The liberal rich pandering for votes use affirmative action and discriminate against Asians because Asian lobbyists don't pay as much, and aren't a big enough voting bloc. Look at how the left treats minorities with little voting power. They turn the hoses on them in North Dakota. That is the true heart of the Democrat Party. What's better? There is no better with the left. There's shitty and more shitty. Take your pick of shitty types. And then there are Republicans in power. Some are shitty, some aren't, but the shitty ones pander to the same dicks the Democrats work for. Side: One is legal. One isn't.
Affirmative action is a legal form of bribe and its aim is to expand the voter base. Hello BO: Looking at it from that angle, I agree with you.. And, I even agree that it expands the voter base.. Why wouldn't it?? Truly, tax cuts too, are an attempt to expand the voter base. That IS the reason politicians DO what they DO. Oh, I WISH it weren't for those reasons.. I WISH they did things for the benefit of citizens.. But, they do things to get re-elected.. Term limits would fix that. excon Side: One is legal. One isn't.
1
point
Oh, I WISH it weren't for those reasons.. I WISH they did things for the benefit of citizens.. But, they do things to get re-elected.. Term limits would fix that. Well, well con. We agree on something. Ready to axe Schumer, Waters, and Pelosi? Side: Bribing is the American way
SUPER STUPID goes into some PSYCHO BABBLE !!!!!!!!!! Talking about TERM LIMITS ! All the while trying to avoid his LEFTIST in HOLLYWOOD are scamming the college education system !!!!!!!! This IDIOT is a PARTY PUPPET and that cannot be DENIED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Side: Bribing is the American way
|