The universe is suited for life
yeah, i know the argument against this is theres no life anywhere else (that we know of) so how can the universe be suited for it?
easy: its the only place that life can even form. Where the conditions are right for life to exist, is a very thriving environment. Sure there are volcanoes and stuff, and asteroids, but that's life.
Life may be spread out near and far, but where it does exist is an extremely sustainable environment.
oh, and humans arent the only life forms
yes
Side Score: 16
|
no
Side Score: 9
|
|
|
|
3
points
1
point
Earth isnt even very well suited for life! The unvierse absolutely isnt. go to the north pole, the sahara desert, or the middle of the ocean and tell me how long u last. Or maybe deep space, or any other planet in the galaxy. 99.5% of the unverse is absolutely horrible for life and totally unsuited for it. Life adapts to the world/unvierse. not the other way around. The reason were here is not indicitive of earth being suited for us, but that life is freaking resilient and stubborn and will spring up anywhere its able to. Side: no
1
point
1
point
If even one other part of the universe has life other than Earth, the universe is suited for life. Earth is suited for life. Why? There's another way you can define, "suited for life" which is that life can exist at all. Your defining it as "good for life" which I agree with. No place is meant to be good for life, but when scientists call a planet "suited for life" they refer to any place it can exist. Side: yes
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
|
1
point
well it has to be, suns only have one safe zone.... but when they are in the safe spot, or whatever astronomists call it, then it is perfectly viable. If life was everywhere we would probably have planetary invasions daily. How can you say the universe isn't suitable for life when it is the only place in the universe that life has actually sprung up??? Side: yes
It's more like saying a manor house with only one furnished and habitable room is fit to live in. (the rest are filled with rubbish, or exposed) How can you say the universe isn't suitable for life when it is the only place in the universe that life has actually sprung up??? Side: yes
1
point
well it has to be, suns only have one safe zone.... but when they are in the safe spot, or whatever astronomists call it, then it is perfectly viable. And these safe zones make up .00000000001% of the universe, if that. Were talking about the entire universe. If life was everywhere we would probably have planetary invasions daily. How can you say the universe isn't suitable for life when it is the only place in the universe that life has actually sprung up??? The universe is the only place in the universe? What? And exactly, if life WAS everywhere that might be an issue, but it isnt. Thats because 99% of the other planets, stars, asteriods, moons, and deep space are not able to sustain life... earth and the other very few lucky planets are few and far between Side: no
|