CreateDebate


Debate Info

1
0
Yes Yep
Debate Score:1
Arguments:1
Total Votes:1
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (1)

Debate Creator

LotusSnot(39) pic



There is no death

After the death of his old friend, Albert Einstein said “Now Besso has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That means nothing. People like us … know that the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”

New evidence continues to suggest that Einstein was right – death is an illusion.

Our classical way of thinking is based on the belief that the world has an objective observer-independent existence. But a long list of experiments shows just the opposite. We think life is just the activity of carbon and an admixture of molecules – we live awhile and then rot into the ground.

We believe in death because we’ve been taught we die. Also, of course, because we associate ourselves with our body and we know bodies die. End of story. But biocentrism – a new theory of everything – tells us death may not be the terminal event we think. Amazingly, if you add life and consciousness to the equation, you can explain some of the biggest puzzles of science. For instance, it becomes clear why space and time – and even the properties of matter itself – depend on the observer. It also becomes clear why the laws, forces, and constants of the universe appear to be exquisitely fine-tuned for the existence of life.

Until we recognize the universe in our heads, attempts to understand reality will remain a road to nowhere.

Consider the weather ‘outside’: You see a blue sky, but the cells in your brain could be changed so the sky looks green or red. In fact, with a little genetic engineering we could probably make everything that is red vibrate or make a noise, or even make you want to have sex like with some birds. You think its bright out, but your brain circuits could be changed so it looks dark out. You think it feels hot and humid, but to a tropical frog it would feel cold and dry. This logic applies to virtually everything. Bottom line: What you see could not be present without your consciousness.

In truth, you can’t see anything through the bone that surrounds your brain. Your eyes are not portals to the world. Everything you see and experience right now – even your body – is a whirl of information occurring in your mind. According to biocentrism, space and time aren’t the hard, cold objects we think. Wave your hand through the air – if you take everything away, what’s left? Nothing. The same thing applies for time. Space and time are simply the tools for putting everything together.

Consider the famous two-slit experiment. When scientists watch a particle pass through two slits in a barrier, the particle behaves like a bullet and goes through one slit or the other. But if you don’t watch, it acts like a wave and can go through both slits at the same time. So how can a particle change its behavior depending on whether you watch it or not? The answer is simple – reality is a process that involves your consciousness.


Read more at http://www.robertlanzabiocentrism.com/is-death-an-illusion-evidence-suggests-death-isnt-the-end/#LjYPSikJfp57QYbf.99


http://www.robertlanzabiocentrism.com/is-death-an-illusion-evidence-suggests-death-isnt-the-end/

Yes

Side Score: 1
VS.

Yep

Side Score: 0
1 point

After the death of his old friend, Albert Einstein said “Now Besso has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That means nothing. People like us … know that the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”

People like Einstein who thought that whatever worked in an equation would work in real life and beat his wife? No thanks.

New evidence continues to suggest that Einstein was right – death is an illusion.

Our classical way of thinking is based on the belief that the world has an objective observer-independent existence.

The thing about objective reality is that it definitely is not subjective. Let me riddle you this, even if everything you experience is subjective and the universe isn't even real except in your head, what is the basis for your consciousness existing? Your consciousness objectively exists so there must be an objective reality because "things" objectively exist which you know because you exist. So reality itself is not a subjective illusion EVEN IF everything you experience is subjective. There must be an objective reality, or there wouldn't be any basis for consciousness. Consciousness does not just exist in a vacuum, and our consciousness is inextricably linked to the bag of physical electro-chemical neurons in our cranium holes. What is more likely, that consciousness magically appeared and dreamed up reality or that our consciousness is the result of a painstaking process of evolution as we interact with and adapt to a cause and effect universe.

We believe in death because we’ve been taught we die.

We believe in death because we DO die, and when the neurons stop firing your consciousness is dead. I know this because your entire consciousness observably is subject to chemical and electrical alterations in the brain. if you add life and consciousness to the equation, you can explain some of the biggest puzzles of science. For instance, it becomes clear why space and time – and even the properties of matter itself – depend on the observer.

Except they don't, space and time don't exist and matter is made from tiny vortexes called particles with are actually like "knots" in a "membrane" called a "field". It also becomes clear why the laws, forces, and constants of the universe appear to be exquisitely fine-tuned for the existence of life.

They're not you stupid dick face, only tiny little pockets of the universe are capable of supporting life.

Consider the weather ‘outside’: You see a blue sky, but the cells in your brain could be changed so the sky looks green or red. In fact, with a little genetic engineering we could probably make everything that is red vibrate or make a noise, or even make you want to have sex like with some birds. You think its bright out, but your brain circuits could be changed so it looks dark out. You think it feels hot and humid, but to a tropical frog it would feel cold and dry. This logic applies to virtually everything. Bottom line: What you see could not be present without your consciousness.

Yes, differently wired neurons can perceive things very differently, theoretically another organism could see a color completely different from how you see it, but if that wavelength wasn't there neither of you would see any color. See how this works you stupid subjective dipshit? We are experiencing objective reality through layers of subjectivity.

In truth, you can’t see anything through the bone that surrounds your brain. Your eyes are not portals to the world. Everything you see and experience right now – even your body – is a whirl of information occurring in your mind.

How does the information enter the mind? Do you just spontaneously have it there or do you need input from somewhere outside your subjective experience of the input?

The same thing applies for time. Space and time are simply the tools for putting everything together.

Space and time are dimensions. When you fold a piece of paper into a triangle, the paper doesn't become a triangle, it takes the shape of a triangle. a triangle is a shape that actual real things can take, but there is no such thing as a triangle that exists independently of the thing that takes it's shape. In this way, space and time don't exist, because no dimension is actually a thing in and of itself. When you right an equation, you might use an X Y and Z to represent 3 spatial dimensions, in your equation these are just as real as the thing you are measuring, but in real life they just represent different directions things are pointing. This is the problem with modern theoretical physics, we write equations that tell us space can bend and time can go backwards and we believe it.

Consider the famous two-slit experiment. When scientists watch a particle

And that's the other thing, just because we rely so heavily on math we believe everything is based on quantity. Particles are denser points in a field, and they are made of field oscillations. They are not individual objects. pass through two slits in a barrier, the particle behaves like a bullet and goes through one slit or the other. But if you don’t watch, it acts like a wave and can go through both slits at the same time. So how can a particle change its behavior depending on whether you watch it or not?

When you observe it you have to create a disturbance that perturbs the wave function, otherwise you have no way of creating a feedback loop of information to relay to your anus hole. If light was transforming from a wave to a particle that would be one thing, but all that is changing is that it goes from an interference pattern with some tiny dielectric vortex balls to an incoherent wave with scattered dielectric vortex balls.

Side: Yes
No arguments found. Add one!