CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:11
Arguments:8
Total Votes:13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 To all "Pro choice" people, would you afford the same denials to Pro choice Germans? (8)

Debate Creator

Cuaroc(8829) pic



To all "Pro choice" people, would you afford the same denials to Pro choice Germans?

I wonder if people who call themselves "Pro Choice" rather than "Pro Abortion" actually believe the lunacy of their perceived unaccountability?

If a person aid's and abet's a person in a crime, he is held liable. In this dillusional world of pro choice people, they deny aiding and abetting aborton when they elect Politicians who they know support all abortions for any reason up till birth (the radical pro abortion Democrat Party).

Does your little world of denial spread out to all the other supporters of mass killings throughout the ages? Were Germans who were personally pro life for Jews, but supported the nazi's and Hilter, accountable? If they helped elect and keep in power the killers of Jews, were these Germans accountable? OF COURSE THEY WERE!

Were people who said they were personally against slavery, yet still electing pro slavery politicians, accountable? OF COURSE THEY WERE!

A person can not claim to oppose inhumanity towards others when keeping in power the very people who vow to keep the inhumanity legal.

To excuse your inhumanity, by sayng you would not personally kill your baby, DOES NOT excuse you from the millions of deaths at the hands of others when supporting their right to abortion. Whether it be abortion, the holocaust, slavery, etc. etc., when you support those in power continuing the inhumanity, you are accountable for every death.

I guarantee you within a couple years, the Democrat party would become pro life if the electorate refused to vote for them.

GUARANTEED! IT'S IN YOUR HANDS! If you are truly personally pro life, tell your Congressmen and Senators you won't vote for them again until they stop their radical no restriction abortion stance. When sayng nothing to them, you have admitted you could not care less and are not truly pro life. The choice to take innocent life, SHOULD NEVER BE A CHOICE, unless extreme cases such as life of mother.
-FromWithin
Add New Argument

I can't even read it all. It's rather depressing to notice such a human (or, at least, a chatbot). Though considering that he can use the Internet with such an intellect, I'd say that it's a chatbot.

1 point

The only reason why FromWithin is creating these abortion debates is because of insecurity. He knows that he is twice as responsible for abortions because he is against condoms and sex education. He freely admits that people who make debates like this are just insecure with their beliefs. He knows he is guilty.

1 point

He isn't really guilty, but a hypocrite and a spammer.

Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

It sounds to me like he feels guilty of something worse than spamming.

1 point

The fundamental flaw of your argument is a mother getting an abortion is making an individual choice about her own body and family whereas the Holocaust is instead a government campaign to utterly exterminate an entire race of people against the wills of all of them.

It's not even apples vs oranges. It's apples vs woodchippers.

I know you don't see it this way and will just insult me and rail against me, but the reason I give is why your scenario will fail to persuade even a one pro choice person to agree with you.

1 point

I have no idea how old you are but I would say you weren't around when Roe v Wade was made a LAW. There were several reasons, one of which was we were all getting very tired of finding dead girls in alleys along WITH a dead fetus (from a botched, amateur abortion!). It seemed at least weekly! Back then we didn't have the instant internet we have today or it would have been daily, probably. It was similar to what Trump calls a "carnage". I would rather save a "born" human who has a mother, sister, brother, friends, etc.. Maybe that sounds a bit callous, but, so does YOUR solution in another way. I would rather a woman had a "choice", usually a very HARD choice, than be forced into a "double death" or being "damaged" for the rest of her life. Many are emotionally damaged by making that choice, anyway. I'm not for frivolous abortions, but, I'm not for others controlling the lives of women either.

Germans? (Nazis) Were a totally different matter. One would have to have a strange mentality to compare the two.

Nazis could be committing suicides (or, suicide bombings) to exterminate lower humans.

So they should be saved rather than valuing sub-humans.

Or something like that.