To combat the recession, we should cull the weakest 10% of our population
Think about the costs certain groups of people cost our country, if they are gone, we become stronger!
Yes
Side Score: 14
|
 |
No
Side Score: 15
|
|
|
|
|
4
points
3
points
2
points
1
point
It is a great idea. The weakest in regard to survival would be the richest 10% of the population. They only exist because they are protected. Shielded from all that one has to do. They know not how to exist without a staff to take care of them. To survive among the poor and middle class, they don't have a chance. With them gone and their wealth divided among the other 90%, we all live like kings. Side: yes
1
point
1
point
|
3
points
3
points
so the weakest 10% i.e. The young, the sick, the poor... yes let's kill them all, accomplishing among other things: A) The imminent genocide of our own races. B) The complete collapse of the healthcare industry and the subsequent mass unemployment of all who work within it. C) The destruction of a vast consumer base, leading to mass unemployment among higher paid workers. Seriously, your plans for recovery are just awful. Argument over! I anticipate that you shall waste my time with this nonsense for the foreseeable future, until you become bored of CreateDebate and leave. Side: No
2
points
No but I do not think we should feed the next 30%. I do not think we should pay for the homes/rent of those next 30%.I don't thing we should support 47% of people by letting them pay no federal taxes (after returns). I wish it was only 10% on the bottom we supported. Now when times are good,sure,have your programs to aid some of the 30% but when the belt tightens,I do not feed someone who has a cell-phone and a flat screen TV. Side: No
Kill people to get stronger? The poorest people are often the hardest workers. They get paid little and own few assets and so they work extra hours to get the basic needs that the rest of us take for granted. If you want to increase strength, the poorer people may be the wrong people to kill. However, the process of picking people to kill is inhumane and disgusting. Being stronger as a purpose for a genocide worse than the world has ever seen is not good. Side: No
Biggest question is who is we? The government? The people? If this is an American you should be ahamed. 10% of population is what 30 million people roughly. Who would be in charge of the culling? Plus what would that help? If your speaking as an American then you dont understand what it means to be an American. Side: No
|
