CreateDebate


Debate Info

21
41
Yes they should No they should not
Debate Score:62
Arguments:57
Total Votes:67
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes they should (21)
 
 No they should not (36)

Debate Creator

souloflight(412) pic



To save paper, children should use computers in school

Yes they should

Side Score: 21
VS.

No they should not

Side Score: 41

Teachers are going around telling everyone to help stop deforestation but they still give out new note taking copies each semester when the old ones have not finished. Computers would help in this. Tue children could bring their own laptops too.

Side: Yes they should
thedudeon(27) Disputed
1 point

i think the teachers gave them notes in recycled paper...;)

Side: No they should not
mwkwon93(25) Disputed
1 point

According to your opinion we have to use everywhere computer not only in school to save papers. And we can use reusable papers.I think this is the solution of saving papers.

Side: No they should not
1 point

Nowadays, people do not economy the paper. they do not think about ecology!!.....and students will help to save our world !....but it can influence to their health, nevertheless people spent all free time in playing computer game and in social sites. and it is playing not so important role. and it will useful for teachers to check students homework.

Side: Yes they should
1 point

Not just to save paper but it's much easier. Instead of losing homework, and all your papers, your have it all in one big folder your computer. Typing is much faster than writing and typing is way more eficeint.

(my school has had us use netbooks and it works way better)

Side: Yes they should
sima(69) Disputed
0 points

i quiet agree with the opinion that it is easier to use computers in order to save papers, it means that we also save trees. But, on the other hand, computers have bad influence on our health!

Side: No they should not
Tima(57) Disputed
1 point

Papers is yestarday's day and now we are modern people and it is easy for us to use computers.

Side: Yes they should
1 point

To save electricity and plastics should children use paper in school?

Side: Yes they should

They might as because technology is taking over.

Side: Yes they should
2 points

You can recycle paper, you can grow trees. You cannot (viably, currently) recycle electricity lost by the laptop. The manufacture and usage of the laptop requires energy, that we mostly get from fossil fuels. Making paper also uses fuels.

There has not been a study on which is better environmentally.

Also, paper notes do not receive viruses and stop working, but laptops can hold significantly more information.

Given the level of knowledge, for now why not just let schools and students decide which one works best for them, and whatever they choose, use it as efficiently as possible?

Side: No they should not
souloflight(412) Disputed
1 point

Actually for many cases you cannot recycle paper. And many people do not care to recycle it, they just throw it away. Year by year there are less places to go trees. Millions of trees are being cut each month for products or area. Laptops can get viruses but paper notes can get lost, forgotten somewhere, ripped or spoiled.

Side: Yes they should
1 point

I agree with you that to saving paper we can use recycle papers instead of using computers. And as you said using laptop can destroy our environment system

Side: No they should not
Liber(1730) Disputed
1 point

You can recycle paper

Recycling is bad for the environment.

you can grow trees.

If only tree huggers realized this.

Side: No they should not
saprophetic(390) Disputed
1 point

Yes, I've read this too; recycling doesn't really save substantial quantities of energy and also reduces demand for new paper trees to be grown. But there is a rationale behind recycling. There's reduced landfill, it saves even more forest from needing to be harvested.

And what environment are you referring to? In the sense of preserving the Earth in a way that the ecosystem in which we live in is sustained, then recycling cannot be bad.

Side: Yes they should

Recycling is bad for the environment.

Recycling has no monetary benefits except recycling cans, which is to say that it is cheaper just to make new paper than it is to recycle paper. How? It is really goes down to supply and demand schedules and scarcity of resources.

Side: No they should not
2 points

Children should not use computers in schools in order to save paper, these is because the waste produced in using the computer may be equivalent to the negative effects caused when making paper.

When we use computers, electrical energy is needed to power in computers, in these case, in the process where electricity is produced, the two most used and famous processes used in order to produce electricity is actually the burning of fossil fuels and usage of nuclear energy.

These are the details in creating energy through nuclear means and burning of fossil fuels.

Fossil Fuels

In a coal or oil fired power station, the fuel is burned, converting its chemical energy into heat and the heat used to convert water into steam at very high temperature and pressure. This then drives a steam turbine, a device which harnesses the energy in the steam, heat and pressure to produce rotational movement, mechanical energy. The rotating shaft of the steam turbine is coupled to the armature of the alternator, so the final result is electricity.

The fuel is burned, when fuel is burned it produces carbon dioxide, what happens if there is excessive carbon dioxide? Greenhouse effect will occur and eventually leading to global warming.

Nuclear Energy

This is the controversial one. Nuclear fission is a process in which unstable (radioactive) atomic nuclei break down, releasing energy in the form of radiation (escaping particles). By concentrating these nuclei together, a controlled chain reaction is produced releasing huge amounts of energy which is used to convert water into steam. The process of generating electricity in a nuclear power plant is simply by steam turbine, exactly the same as in a fossil fuel plant. The public fear of nuclear power is twofold: the risk of meltdown - an uncontrolled nuclear reactor is not very different from an 'atomic' bomb; also the by-product, radioactive nuclear waste, is none too pleasant.

As an aside - Nuclear energy does not obey the classical Physics law of conservation of Energy. It does however obey the Modern Physics law of conservation of Mass-Energy which allows for interconversion of matter and energy according to Einstein's famous equation E=mc² This fundamental difference means that Nuclear Energy is potentially the most fruitful source of all. It is important that proper scientific research & development into nuclear energy, and Nuclear Fusion in particular, should be allowed to continue.

If in any case that the nuclear power plant has some problems and leaks radiation, it causes more pollution and kill more living organisms, including trees. In other words, less trees will be able to make papers. Currently, there is already two serious nuclear leakage problems, Chernobyl and Japan, Fukushima.

Therefore I conclude that to save paper, children should not use computers in school as the create computer waste.

Side: No they should not
1 point

Yes!!! using computer can effect worse because computer needs much energy so it can effect to global warming. So we have to use reusable paper and not use computer.

Side: No they should not
1 point

Yeah, there will be lots of computer waste produced! Overtime, using paper maybe more environmental clean then using the computers, where computer waste is produced/

Side: No they should not
1 point

no because there eye site would get worst and with computer any virus can occur

Side: No they should not
souloflight(412) Disputed
1 point

For that the children have to be smart enough not to sit 6cm away from the computer. Also my father is in ophthalmology and he says that from sitting to close to a screen a child's eye site cannot weaken. Also a computer may get viruses but paper notes can get lost or ripped. (i explained this in a dispute with the first debater as well)

Side: Yes they should
thedudeon(27) Disputed
1 point

to be smart enough they need to attain maturity. and that doesnt come soon enough...so till then we need to give them something less dangerous....im sure we dont give knifes to kids..even they help in their projects lol...(maybe to cut) because they eed to knw how to use it ..they need maturity..it goes the same for a laptop

Side: No they should not
mwkwon93(25) Disputed
1 point

If everyone keep this rule no one fail their eyesight, because it is very hard to keep. And this rule can decrease percent of failing eyesight it cannot take off the failing eyesight.

Side: No they should not
1 point

Yes, you are right, computer monitor can fail children's eyesight. Computers can fail children eyesight is enough possible.

Side: No they should not
souloflight(412) Disputed
1 point

Mostly the stationery used by children can harm them. Pencils can poke their eyes. Papers can cut them, compass' can scratch them, ink can splatter on them...(i could go on ;) )

Side: Yes they should
1 point

Nope, because with paper that's it. That's all there is.

With computers there is a ton of stuff that can distract children from actual school work. Even clip art on word can be distracting and more interesting to children than school work.

Ironically, that's how I found this site :') I was bored in my computer class and Facebook and Myspace are blocked, so I found this to entertain me and got hooked lol

Side: No they should not
2 points

^__^ Same at mine. I actually found this site while researching for a debate (not mine specifically, but on the same issue).

We find distractions anyway. I am the master at making jetplanes @.@

Side: No they should not
souloflight(412) Disputed
1 point

Children are going to find distractions everywhere. they can start doodling in their copies too. The school can also block many sites. And open google or yahoo when the child needs to do some work.

Side: Yes they should
thedudeon(27) Disputed
1 point

but google can lead u too those sites u want...atleast u have images on google. and even if u block those sites it does not mean u cant have a glimpse of them and later go home and check it out .even if they do find distractions elsewhere its ultimately on the student whether or not he wants to create an awesome future for him self ..it takes time for tht impulse to come but till then they need to hang in there.

Side: No they should not
Saurbaby(5581) Disputed
1 point

Yeah, but the less distractions the better. Simple. Nothing is too distracting about a piece of paper and pencil at some point.

And kids these days are smart, they can get through any block at some point with some time. Trust me, I know.

Side: No they should not
1 point

Computer can distract children. Also it is very hard to control their mind themselves. Because they are still young.

Side: No they should not
1 point

First of all, to use computer in school because of saving paper is it not right reason. And I know that when you are writing something you can memorize better than doing in computer. And we can save paper by using reusable paper but most of people not using reusable paper. And using computers at school can not save a big amount of papers. Also to use computer at school government should buy computers but it is not easy work to the government to use computer because of saving paper, if the reason was like computer education will improve the intellect of children it can be reasonable.

Side: No they should not
1 point

I'm lost here: why do we have to save paper? Forests are increasing in size - the whole idea behind deforestation (ie. "tree hugging") is fallacious/flawed on a fundamental level.

Side: No they should not
1 point

Indeed to save paper we can find another way. Personally, children shouldn`t use computer, instead saving paper, because it`s bad for their health, eye vision. I understand that they are living in developing world, but this is too much.

Side: No they should not
1 point

Children should still write with paper because they're handwriting can be horrible from not writing for so long. I believe that computer is what keeps them from doing their work because they are focused on something else rather then they're work.

Side: No they should not
1 point

I think using computers is not beneficial compare with using papers. First of all, by using computers we also waste papers, as we use printing as well. Moreover, computers are harm for health. As you know the long-term incorrect use of computers and related equipment can expose you to increased health risks. The third reason is why we shouldn't use computers instead of papers is that it is much better to write than type out. In some ways computers can help, but it is still necessary to use papers.

Side: No they should not
1 point

Children don't have enough responsibility to use a computer. Modern life is too convenient for them. They need to do more activities than learning by sitting in front of the computer all day.It's true to save trees but using the computer destroys environment than a paper.

Side: No they should not
0 points

to save paper, children should plant more trees which help in paper production...cause u can plant seeds and grow them but u cant plant "computer seeds" and grow them rofl.

Side: No they should not
1 point

yes it is another solution to save paper, we think only how to decrease using paper. But by planting trees we can make papers more.

Side: No they should not
souloflight(412) Disputed
0 points

Ok. that actually made me laugh (the computer seed part) actually if we plant seeds it takes years for the tree to actually go to a height where it can be used for a product and there is less space in the world now to plant the trees.

Side: Yes they should
thedudeon(27) Disputed
1 point

why is there less place in the world to plant trees ? because uve been manufacturing laptops...u need to dig out resources. and besides diging is just a one time option- u cant dig and then ....after few years expect tht place to grow resources,,they get exhausted!!.finally i guess if we pick ur trend then we shud mine under our houses when everything runs out. but well trees,,,they grow even if it means long time...and u can make paper out of any pulpy source...they can be even garden weeds..u only need the [pulp.

Side: No they should not
mwkwon93(25) Disputed
1 point

but if you are not start seed plant now, in future you can not make paper never so to increase number of tree we have to star plant right now.

Side: No they should not