To what extent do you agree that single sex schools are better for education?
Agree
Side Score: 3
|
 |
Disagree
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, I completely agree that in single sex schools children blossom and develop their self-esteem, besides their educational skills may become better. Secondly, some people tend to believe that there may exist envy, however, it is just stereotype. Because, nowadays, in single sex schools are equal uniform, and girls or boys can't see clothes or another things of another student. Thirdly, single sex scools offer to explore a leadership to every girl and boy. Studying apart play an important role in developing of self-esteem. Because, in adolescence girls become more shy and may have problems with science and mathematics, while boys blossom in this sphere. Studying separately is the better way for their developing. Besides, children focus mostly on education. There is no boys in single sex school for girls and mutually for the boys, and it is clear that children pay more attention to studying and their education. To conclude, I definitely agree that single sex schools are better to educate children Side: Agree
1
point
There is no boys in single sex school for girls and mutually for the boys, and it is clear that children pay more attention to studying and their education. A 60-minute PowerPoint presentation on the Congress of Vienna will do wonders for your standards and preferences. In all honesty, I'm not the only one who'd end up looking at the boys instead. Adolesence is also a time for "uncertainty". Side: Disagree
1
point
|
1
point
1
point
1
point
It provides a more sound environment for the students, indeed. But, this does not contribute to them learning about the opposite sex and how to deal with them. And while the social interactions in schools do not reflect accurately upon how social interactions in the adult world are, ANY interaction is better for learning then absolutely no interaction. Side: Disagree
|
