CreateDebate


Debate Info

15
20
YES NO
Debate Score:35
Arguments:34
Total Votes:36
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 YES (14)
 
 NO (16)

Debate Creator

Nox0(1393) pic



Tooth fairy is real !!! Ontological argument for Tooth Fairy :D

1. Tooth fairy is defined as being maximally capable in stealth trading teeth for Dollar notes  (Definition applied).

2. If a being(Tooth Fairy) with the predicate of being maximally capable in stealth trading teeth for Dollar notes has not all possible tooth fairy trading skills, then it is not real Tooth Fairy (Premise 1)

3.  being maximally capable in stealth trading teeth for Dollar notes must applies it's skill on all lost teeth (Premise 2)

4.All lost teeth includes all known lost teeth (Modal logic necessity)

......... 5. It is possible that a Tooth Fairy exists (Assume for conditional proof, a.k.a no proof)

......... 6. Tooth Fairy will Stealth trade all possible teeth (Premise 3 and 5)

......... 7. Tooth Fairy will Stealth trade all know lost teeth (Premise 4 and 6)

8. If it is possible that a Tooth fairy exists, then a Tooth Fairy will Stealth trade allknown lost teeth (Conditional/no proof from Premises 5-7)

9. Impossibility is equivalent to not possible (By definition)

10. If something is not impossible, then it is not not possible (Premise 9)

11. Everything is either possible or impossible, though not necessarily necessary for possibility (Modal logic necessity)

12. Everything is possible unless impossible. (Premise 10 and 11)

13. Tooth Fairy has no contradicting features (Premise 1)

14. Tooth Fairy is not impossible (Premise 13)

15. Tooth Fairy is possible (Premise 12 and 14)

16. Tooth Fairy exists and takes care about all known lost teeth (Premise 8 and 15)

YES

Side Score: 15
VS.

NO

Side Score: 20
1 point

Muhehe :D

Side: YES
1 point

Mind = Blown

Side: YES
4 points

You know full well that this isn't logical. It's sad that you think you can debunk such a well thought out theory with some flippant comments. You seem to believe you're right without actually studying it. Sounds familiar :P

Side: NO
Nox0(1393) Disputed
1 point

Ontological argument is very easy to debunk .

Side: YES
Atrag(5666) Disputed
1 point

Nothing you've said so far does. I'm studying at the moment so I can understand it properly and criticise it. Its not as simple as you seem to believe and you should take some time over it.

Side: NO
1 point

This is not a logical argument.

Side: NO
Nox0(1393) Disputed
1 point

It's as logical as your version, also breaks breaks apart on 5, but that didn't seems to be problem for your... why is it now?

Side: YES
lolzors93(3225) Disputed
1 point

My point five was the beginning of a conditional proof........

Side: NO

Well, I've caught my dad pretty much taking my tooth from under my pillow and i have found the teeth in his bedroom, so no the tooth fairy is not real.

Side: NO
Nox0(1393) Disputed
1 point

Well, I've caught my dad pretty much taking my tooth from under my pillow and i have found the teeth in his bedroom, so no the tooth fairy is not real.

OR

You've uncovered the tooth fairy's real identity :D

Side: YES