CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Hows that awful at all! If that what turns him/her on then you have no right to dispute. As well, there was no reference to Hitler's actual actions at all in this argument.
Obviously, why wouldn't it be? Exterminating this group would lead to a better universe because no longer would Jews be looking for a homeland that doesn't exist because nobody likes them.
Quite true. Though I think his initial plans to send them all to Madagascar would have been a little less drastic :L
Though obviously I am completely opposed to what the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians and am not gonna bother hiding it just because some lanky twat somewhere says I'm 'racist' for not liking a certain religion. Not that I particularly like any religion :L
OFF TOPIC so I think most of what Hitler did was wrong, but in schools they all teach that Hitler used the Jews as scapegoats for the first world war, even though all the leading bankers of the time were Jewish and all responsibly for the banking crash. In that aspect he was right. But killing them all?? Too far.
Of course he was correct! Hitler makes my nipples tingle with erotic excitement, his very presence makes my virgin pussy wet. I think Hitler was misunderstood. He just killed a bunch of Jews to make room for more normal white people. Is that such a bad thing?
The only thing better than Hitler is an owl. Owls are cool...
Hitler was wrong in a great many ways practically and morally. First of all he thought the Aryans were Blonde and Blue Eyed when they originated in Persia so would have been dark skinned with dark hair and brown eyes, also he would not have fitted into his own master race considering that he was dark haired. Secondly he invaded Russia which is hard enough but they were already fighting in France and elsewhere spreading his troops too thin. Morally his attitude to Homosexuals, Gypsies, the Jews and the disabled and his acts of genocide were just morally wrong.
Yeah thank god the USSR (who exterminated everyone who got in Stalin's path of his megalomaniac world vision) stopped those fascists from "Exterminating everyone who gets in the path of your megalomaniacal world vision"
To be specific, Hitler stopped Hitler. Germany could have beaten Russia, however, Stalin began to give his generals power and allow them to fight the battles strategically. Hitler ignored most of his general's advice and made terrible decisions.
And when Stalin "stopped Hitler" what did he do? Did he liberate the oppressed areas? Did he make their lives better? Nope, it was just like exchanging one dictator for another.
I don't think you can eve say marginally to be honest. Look at the way the USSR treated the Ukraine and the other regions they occupied, its very hard to make and argument that this was in anyway better than Hitler's Germany.
Actually, they both killed about 25% during the war. Then when you add in the gulags, famines and purges from the USSR, Stalin (and Lenin for that matter as well) did far more damage to the Ukraine. Also, I'm not just making this up, my family has some roots in the Ukraine and some of my relatives were there during WWI and WWII, the Russians were worse.
My dad's girlfriend grew up in the Soviet Union, and her mother was AAA gunner in Stalingrad.
Though, the "Russian's" weren't worse than the Nazis. They did not systematically exterminate entire races, the gulags were more rehabilitate, though they were ghastly.
I've talked people who lived in the Ukraine, fought with resistance and had their entire village murdered. Since the Nazis hating a specif "race" (religion) make them worse? As if the USSR had nothing against Jews or Christians. The gulags were no better than Hitler's camps.
PS: Georgia and Ukraine are two separate places and maintain separate identities.
Yes, that is true. Most of the kills Stalin was credited with came from starvation. This is terrible, but it is not deliberately killing in a programme. Yes, some of the starvation deaths were a deliberate programme, but not all.
Furthermore, things got better after Stalin for a bit.
After Hitler they would get worse. Imagine someone like Hydrich or Himmler in power.
Stalin did orchestrate many famines. What about to kolak scare? Things never got better with Stalin in most of the occupied regions, some benefits arose but most of them came from the war ending and not having everything burned when either side would fall backr.
I'm sorry you can't use facts or logic to convey your point and have to resort to typing in all caps like a 5 year old.
Allow me to reiterate, Hitler was fiscally liberal, Hitler was a socialist and Hitler nationalized most of Germany's economy. None of those are right-wing.
I am not referring to the oxford dictionary of two separate words I am using a term used to describe political ideologies. In American (and European politics as well) liberal used to mean libertarian until the progressive era when the term took on a new meaning.
Socialism: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.
Hitler nationalized most of the German economy, that fits the bill.
Socialism was everything he stood against
Then why was he the leader of the national socialist party? Why did he implement socialist policies?
You are a total idiot.
Aww the little boy with the single digit IQ score has to resort to name calling.
I am not a little boy and I personally advocate abolishing IQ tests altogether because I believe that speed of learning and memorizing isn't anything to do with intelligence, it is instead one of almost infinite aspects comprising it (but IQ seems to assume that this to be the only factor in determining intelligence).
Hitler was neither left-wing nor right-wing.
He was an economic centrist who leaned to right-wing philosophy a lot of the time (hence he had a heavy war on communist Russia as a huge advocate of capitalism).
He was an economic centrist who leaned to right-wing philosophy a lot of the time (hence he had a heavy war on communist Russia as a huge advocate of capitalism).
Are you serious? How many times to I have to explain it to you?
Socialism: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.
Hitler nationalized most of the German economy. Nationalizing means to make something owned by the government.
Hitler was not a capitalist in the least.
"We are not fighting Jewish or Christian capitalism, we are fighting every capitalism." - Hitler
JUST BECAUSE HITLER SAID HE IS FIGHTING IT doesn't mean he was telling the truth.
Just listen, Hitler liked to have governmental control only when necessary. Once the war was over he was always planning on making a brutally aristocratic state (but this time the aristocrats would be Aryans as opposed to Jews).
JUST BECAUSE HITLER SAID HE IS FIGHTING IT doesn't mean he was telling the truth.
He acted as a socialist. He fought capitalism.
Just listen, Hitler liked to have governmental control only when necessary. Once the war was over he was always planning on making a brutally aristocratic state (but this time the aristocrats would be Aryans as opposed to Jews).
Hitler had no plans of having a non-nationalized economy. His post-war plans was to develop the lands he had claimed for Germany, enslave the slavs and eventually expand the empire even further.
Somebody who is fiscally liberal and socially conservative is a government loving totalitarian, and totalitarians are the pure evil in this world, this means Hitler was probably a pretty fucked up person he was more evil than I thought and I thought he was pretty fucking evil!
