Very nice to meet you as well Loudacris! I know it must be difficult to "hear" everything that's going on so one can answer properly and fully.

Yes, everyone can be a part of these meetings but they only come up every so often. Any concerns or questions you have should be sent to them via the Contact Us Link...otherwise you'll wait forever.

We could be much more formal... Robert's Rules of Order formal, if necessary. But where's the web 2.0 fun in that?

I "left" twice...once for about 45 seconds and the other for about 30 seconds. I scrolled up and read what had been said. I don't remember anyone taking a vote on the non-identification of those who down-vote, do you? Voting should have been decided tonight...it's waited too long as it is to have that cleared up. I don't remember them asking if anyone was in agreement with anything mentioned actually...or if they weren't....why they weren't. The 'Research' tab hasn't worked since I've been here and neither has another tab while you're setting up a debate but you can access the function through the moderators panel. You can put as many reference URLs as you wish within your description box or your comments over and above the one area listed and you always could. It was always planned to not have the pages tiled but to have all the pages the same as the first one. I didn't hear much on that topic which was rather a non-topic since it was already pointed out in the original announcement.

I only wish I had a copy of the entire thread of the conversation so I could go over it again. I hope they post it but they probably won't.....I can't see them doing much else than giving a synopsis of it, if they did anything at all. I tried to get in several things but couldn't but I'll write it all down and send it by other means. And what was the deal with name calling...I didn't call anyone a nut. I said if anyone did (whatever it was) they were nuts. Why did you get on me so hard on that?