CreateDebate


Debate Info

21
25
Yes, taste first No, customer is alway right
Debate Score:46
Arguments:16
Total Votes:60
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes, taste first (7)
 
 No, customer is alway right (9)

Debate Creator

paralogical(55) pic



Was denying cust an iced espresso on principle right?

integrity of coffee, or customer 1st?

In Murky Coffee a customer tried to get an iced espresso, but was told that the store policy was to not serve iced espresso drinks because it destroys the taste of the espresso (or if you're a coffee nerd, ruins the crema). So the customer ordered an espresso and a glass of ice and poured the espresso over the ice in front of the sad barista ruining "the integrity of the coffee." While I'm sure it didn't taste as delicious, was the store policy correct to deny the customer the choice, or does the rule that the customer is always correct win?


Yes, taste first

Side Score: 21
VS.

No, customer is alway right

Side Score: 25

I grew up in and around two very different businesses. One was ladies clothing, the other was the restaurant business and both were obviously customer driven! One must draw the line in matters of taste. The owners offerings and the customers wishes must strike a balance that is fair for both parties. I've known restaurants that state their way of doing business right on the menu; "No Substitutions." In ladies retail you might see a sign that says "No Alterations" or "Sold As Is."

This is, however, an argument I can appreciate both ways. As an owner and as a customer. As an owner, I'd want you to have the best that I can possibly prepare for you and have you taste it as I think it should be. The customer is not always right but the customer always thinks they know what they want and how they want it. The typical espresso is made with a fair amount of specially dark roasted beans which yields very little in the cup. With a taste for iced espresso, which is delicious, they would have needed to make about 4 doubles which would be over the top in price. I believe in taste first in this instance because you're certainly going to dilute a superb coffee which shouldn't be diluted. If the customer then badmouths you for selling weak espresso, your reputation is going to suffer. So too with the request for iced espresso. You'd be badmouthed for that too. As an owner I would have taken the hit on this one and ushered that customer out the door!

Side: In this case taste wins
4 points

Since it's their store, they have the right to limit the options for sale. McDonalds wouldn't sell a raw burger or a coffee milkshake just because someone demands to buy one. If an item is listed on the menu, then it's for sale, otherwise, it's not. That they limit their offerings based on a desire to make better coffee makes the decision to not sell even more correct. The customer's passive-agressive message on his tip (see link) shows that the customer is not always right.

Side: taste wins
djs72(2) Disputed
2 points

While they have the right to refuse to limit options, this was still an classic example of bad customer service. The employee should have given him another option. And if the guy paid for his espresso and cup of ice, at that point, it's not anyone's business what he does with it. Sure the customer was PA, but the owner was also wrong to offer him a punch in the dick. Bad behavior indeed on both sides, but the issue is deeper than a denial based on principle.

Side: No, customer is alway right
3 points

First and foremost, the costumer is not always right. Most costumers are usually wrong. I applaud this owner for not giving into a request for espresso over ice; it’s nasty and ruins the flavor of the espresso. I have worked coffee for many years and I to deal with many costumers that have unusual requests for coffee like this guy. I have denied people coffee for ordering coffee drinks that I don’t want to make, like (This was an actual order) an ½ caf, ½ soy, ½ skim milk, 1/3 sugar free chocolate, 1/3 sugar free caramel, 1/3 regular caramel, wormed up to 120 degrees but not to hot. I just turned around and gave her a cup of coffee with a little soy milk and told her that this is all she gets.

People get to crazy with coffee. Black or with cream, why is this so hard? If you want iced coffee, order toddy, it better and has more caffeine.

VIVA BARISTA!

JR

Side: Yes, taste first
Inkwell(328) Disputed
3 points

First, coffee tastes like mud so the whole point is moot. If you serve flavored coffees, milk in coffee, soy in coffee, then there is obviously no integrity involved, just snobbery. Supposedly the best coffee bean in the world is collected from the droppings of a palm civet in the Philippines. No thank you. If you allow cream and sugar, why not ice? As for some pissant coffee jockey dictating what he will and will not serve, that is another whole issue.

Side: No, customer is alway right
2 points

Places like Murky, that take espresso serious and pour their hearts and souls into making perfect creations, knows that pouring shots of espresso over ice spells trouble for two main reasons:

First, the make-up of the shot itself goes through a slight change when abruptly introduced to ice--and the result downgrades a creamy and flavorful shot to a slightly bitter alter ego of a shot.

Second, as a former barrista, I know that 99% of the people who order espresso over ice are planning to create what industry folks call the "Ghetto Latte." Shots of espresso are much more cheap than iced lattes. . .and the Ghetto Latte connoisseur knows this. They get their espresso over ice, walk over to the sugar/cream bar, and fill their cup to the brim with milk and sugar. . .thus, getting out of the $1.00 or so extra that would cover the cost for that sugar and milk. Yes, that's right. . .these people are cheap bastiches.

I frequent places like Murky because they take espresso seriously and won't rape a shot no matter how much a cheap bastard will tip or feel good about himself. If you want a crap drink, that is what Starbucks is for.

Side: kick the cheap bastiches out
2 points

I'm not sure of the level of education people have in the coffee culture here. I am going to assume that everyone here is willing to take a second to learn...

Nick Cho is a pioneer of the Specialty Coffee Culture. If anyone were to ask who is important in this relatively new culture, one would respond "Nick Cho, Peter Giuliano etc..."

He is the equivalent of Chef Gordon Ramsay to us "Coffee snobs"...

Would you tell Gordon Ramsay how you would like him to prepare a meal for you? I wouldn't. He'd kick your ass before he kicked it out of his restaurant. Certain foods are prepared a certain way for a reason. People who are professionals at their craft know what they are talking about. That is why they are considered "Professionals in their craft"...

Nick is a professional in his craft. You, Jeff Simmermon, are a stupid and ignorant tool.

So, if you want espresso your way... Go somewhere where quality is degraded to the standards of a true American consumer. (Starbucks).

Soon enough the "Coffee snob" culture will be at a point where we can point to the door when Jeff Simmermons order espresso on ice.

I think it's funny how people are so willing to judge a book by its cover in this instance. This isn't Burger King. You can't have it your way. I'll say once more - If you want it your way, go to Starbucks.

Side: Yes, taste first
2 points

If the facility has a policy not to serve something, then they don't have to serve it; the customer can go elsewhere.

If I walked into an expensive restaurant and demanded a chilidog, would they do it, just because I'm a customer and customers are always right? Of course not.

Each business has an image to support and although customer satisfaction is one part of that image, food quality is also something which can make or break fancier places.

Side: Yes, taste first
2 points

to a certain extent, what needs to be said has already been said, but here is my view. just because an artisan coffee shop makes itself just as accessible as an average coffee shop doesn't mean that they should now feel obligated to bow to the ignorant wishes of the general consumer.

if murky and other coffee shops of similar a caliber were raise their prices, enforce a dress code, and require reservations, no one would ask for stupid crap that's not on the menu. just because the artisan coffee industry affords the general populace the ability to enjoy their product, does not mean that the business in question should have to lower their standards. Capitalism? yes.

Side: Yes, taste first
4 points

It's a coffee store. You're supposed to drink coffee there. The guy knows how he likes his coffee. It's not like iced espresso is difficult to do - they obviously had ice and coffee. If they want to stay in business, they need to learn some basic customer service. At least don't just say no, offer other options instead. That way they still get the customer and the rules stay in place, but they're not dicks about it.

Side: customer is right
2 points

A coffee shop that refuses to fill special orders should not expect to be very successful. This might be part of its appeal, however-- it stays "underground," and caters to a specific clientele. Namely, coffee snobs. So on principle? I don't think it's right or wrong. Business-wise, I'd say it's inviting failure.

Side: No, customer is alway right
2 points

Although customers can definitely be idiots, if you want to provide good service you aren't condescending. The employee should have said something like "we don't do that, but the iced __________ is an excellent option and probably tastes better." There was no reason for the employee to act like his fingernails were being pulled out or his dog had just died when all the customer did was order espresso over ice. Say what you may about Starbuck's, one thing they do well (and a huge reason for their success) is that they know how to treat their customers. In fact, that's true for most really successful business and business people. I wouldn't be surprised if Murky (and what kind of name is that for a coffee shop anyway? Makes me think of a dirty fishtank!) is out of business within the next year, particularly after all this bad publicity the owner has helped create for himself. Like someone said about this, the casual laid back coffee drinkers won't mind walking another block for a good experience. Who needs the snobby purists who threaten to punch you in the dick?

Side: customer is right
1 point

Is this a serious debate? Whatever store that was, the cust should have written to the owner or corporate manager. In all service industries the cust should always be right and who cares what the cust does, as long as they are paying?

Side: customer is right
1 point

No. That's ridiculous, the customer should be able to decide what they want.

Side: No, customer is alway right
0 points

I think too much is missing here if you haven't read the story. After all he said that he denied him on principle (and Murky does pour a good shot), but they gladly served him an Americano on ice. And then he goes on to talk about the ghetto latte.

So no....the customer isn't always right, but Jeff is in this case. Charge him $.50 for the cup of ice if you want. If you want to be a dick, charge him $5, but the post on the murky coffee site is...well....unprofessional.

Side: No, customer is alway right
-1 points

This is like an architect only designing houses that he/she likes and not following customer's requests out of principle. Which is fine, they are entitled to do so - but the customer is also entitled to go somewhere else.

Side: No, customer is alway right