What Cuaroc is doing is nothing less than point-farming which is what I was banned for.
He is posting non-original content for the sake of garnering easy points.
Each debate can get you 5 points as creating is 1 point and four arguments posted is 4. Him accrediting FromWithin is no different to me accrediting idebate for my debates when I pointfarmed.
I just got better at point-farming and used communities to do it in and made it a rule in that community that spamming is okay which Andy was fine with until people whined and moaned.
Cuaroc should be banned for point-farming alone, furthermore for his indirect harassment of FromWithin.
Yes
Side Score: 2
|
 |
No
Side Score: 13
|
|
|
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
I respectfully disagree. Cuaroc is trying to debate topics he is being banned from. Both the act of banning and the act of creating a second debate for purposed of being able to debate the topic seem perfectly fine to me. I do not agree it is for point farming. BTW, the reason you were banned is for how you did your point farming. You created a storm of endless, meaningless spam on the site. Do you think PhxDemocrat was point farming? I do! But PhxDemocrat was doing it by creating real debates and real arguments. Am I supposed to stop that? It looks like it did on its own! Side: No
|
