CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
He's definitely a sex pest. I'm not gonna argue with you. Even his ex-wife accused him of rape.
This is why I find America so difficult to get my head around. On the one hand, Americans keep telling us they live in the greatest country on Earth. On the other, their leader is a serial sex attacker.
While migrants in Europe rape and assault women through taharush gamea, over 1,000 in one night in Cologne, Germany, and you tell us how great migrants are while acting like you don't know what Muslim rape games are...
This belief appears central to your mental illness. The belief that only migrants rape and assault women.
It's a strange belief, given that you are the most vocal supporter of Trump on this site, and Trump has been accused of sexual assault more times than Bill Cosby.
During the 2015/2016 New Year's Eve celebrations, there were mass sexual assaults, 24 alleged rapes, and numerous thefts in Germany, mainly in Cologne city center. There were similar incidents at the public celebrations in Hamburg, Dortmund, Düsseldorf, Stuttgart[26] and Bielefeld.[14][27][28] For all of Germany, police report that 1,200 women were sexually assaulted and estimate that at least 2,000 men were involved, acting in groups.
All of the incidents involved women being surrounded and assaulted by groups of men on the street.[29][30] Police reported that the perpetrators were men of "Arab or North African appearance" and said that Germany had never experienced such mass sexual assaults before
So was Clarence Thomas. It turned out he was innocent and it was a political assassination attempt.
Don't butcher my sentences, bronto. Trump has been accused of sexual assault by literally dozens of different women, in allegations stretching back decades before he had anything to do with politics.
Actually, his ex wives all came out in support for him pre- election.
Yes, it's pretty amazing how many women have changed their minds about whether Trump raped them after they have been threatened, coerced, terrorised or simply bribed.
In fact, now I come to think of it, didn't the 13 year old Trump was accused of raping claim she was repeatedly plagued with death threats?
The part of the book that caused the most controversy concerns Trump’s divorce from his first wife, Ivana. Hurt obtained a copy of her sworn divorce deposition, from 1990, in which she stated that, the previous year, her husband had raped her in a fit of rage. In Hurt’s account, Trump was furious that a “scalp reduction” operation he’d undergone to eliminate a bald spot had been unexpectedly painful. Ivana had recommended the plastic surgeon. In retaliation, Hurt wrote, Trump yanked out a handful of his wife’s hair, and then forced himself on her sexually. Afterward, according to the book, she spent the night locked in a bedroom, crying; in the morning, Trump asked her, “with menacing casualness, ‘Does it hurt?
Bronto, I'm not going to warn you again about your purposeful selection bias. The next lines read:-
She and Donald have raised three kids together. They’re picking their bedrooms in the White House,” Hurt said. “But she’s not saying it’s untrue, or that she didn’t swear to it under oath.”
If you had a choice between being killed by the most powerful man on Earth or being rewarded by him, which would you choose?
You are just madder than a mercury hatter. First, you slander all Muslims as rapists and then you spend the next fifteen minutes lying to defend someone who very patently is a serial rapist, simply because he's fat, rich and white instead of thin, poor and Asian.
The sheer number of accusations against him, from completely unrelated sources, and stretching back as far as they do, is evidence in and of itself what his attitude is towards women. Trump is on tape ADMITTING that he has sexually assaulted women, and still you are demanding proof, AFTER you came in here and arbitrarily labelled 1.5 billion different people as rapists on the grounds that they follow Islam.
You know what, buddy? I'm done with your insanity for tonight. Come back tomorrow.
So show us video of your claim that his ex wife said he raped her or show us the "copy". We aren't going to blindly take a rabid leftist's word for it over his ex-wife, nor should we.
Hurt finally made it onto CNN last week, after ten more women had come forward to accuse Trump of violating them. “I applaud their courage,” he said, “and thank them for telling the truth under what must be painful and embarrassing circumstances.”
CNN, just as I figured. The Clinton Fake News outlet. Couldn't have guessed that one...
Are you on crystal meth, you raging imbecile? New Yorker Magazine has absolutely nothing to do with CNN. It has previously gotten into trouble for posting a cover showing Obama wearing a turban.
Yes, it's pretty amazing how many women have changed their minds about whether Trump raped them
Isn't it though? He gets elected, and suddenly they all disappeared. It must be magic. I'll bet you a dollar that Roy Moore's accusers soon all disappear too...
Frankly, I wish I knew. Leading theories suggest to me that there may be more, but is it in this dimension, even? If it's in another dimension, is it still in 'our' universe?
I'm really only on this side because the definition of the universe that I understand is essentially everything we can possibly quantify.
I'm really only on this side because the definition of the universe that I understand is essentially everything we can possibly quantify.
That is true, but dimensions themselves fall under this category.
Some scientists suggest a possible multiverse. There is no physical evidence, obviously, but it would help explain the seemingly perfect conditions of our own universe in terms of the anthropic principle.
I suppose, but the hypotheticals just get crazy, and not only can I not keep up, I don't even try. It makes for great science fiction and fantasy, but as for reality, it's complex enough.
I hear physicists claim the universe is expanding into itself, I don't fully understand that idea though. Besides, if something exists 'outside' it is automatically part of everything that exists, and therefore part of the universe.
Besides, if something exists 'outside' it is automatically part of everything that exists, and therefore part of the universe.
So let me get this straight. If something exists outside of the universe it is automatically part of the universe because of your unsupported premise that the universe is everything which exists?
Um. No.
If the universe is expanding, that automatically precludes what is outside the universe from being part of the universe, on the grounds that it is not expanding.
I appreciate that you have stuck to the topic, but please don't use circular reasoning in my debates.
Nothingness would be nothing. Empty space, in the most literal sense. That, I don't have so much of a problem with, and have always felt was likely, from a young age.
Just because there's literally nothing there doesn't mean there's no space for the universe to expand into.
That’s like asking what angle is the 5th corner of a circle. It’s not that there is nothing outside the universe, it’s that there no such thing as outside the universe (unless you take a norrower definition)
That’s like asking what angle is the 5th corner of a circle.
It is nothing like the question you compared it to, because the question you compared it to is centred on the false premise that circles have corners.
there no such thing as outside the universe
Did you even read through the thread before pompously pretending that you know everything? Clearly, if there were "no such thing as outside the universe" then the universe could not be expanding, because "no such thing" would exist for it to expand into. Even if there is a vast abyss of nothingness outside the universe, it must still exist in a physical sense in order for the universe to expand into it.
Your attitude stinks, Amarel. Your arrogance outweighs your ability to think critically by about a metric ton.
The expansion of the universe is not the same as outward movement. Scientists postulate that in the earliest stages of universal expansion, the rate of expansion was faster than the speed of light. This is not a breach of the known laws of physics because the universe wasn’t moving into or through anything at the speed of light, rather space-time itself was simply expanding. The false premise in my analogy is what makes the analogy valid. It illustrates in clear terms that there is a false premise in your question. Namely that there is such a thing as outside the universe. There isn’t.