Debate Info

install flash for graphs
The Chicken The Egg
Debate Score:70
Arguments:41
Total Votes:97
Show More Stats

Argument Tags

side graph
 
 The Egg (9)
 
 The Chicken (5)
 
 Define chicken egg (1)

Debate Creator

KLRPILR(41) pic



What came first? The chicken or the egg?

Let's get deep here people...

The Chicken

Side Score: 24
VS.

The Egg

Side Score: 46
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

the answer is they are both intrinsic to the field,ie the print in this message is black,but without any contrasting white you wouldnt see it.

yin yang zen buddhism alan watts

442 days ago | Tagged As: The Chicken
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Chicken comes first before egg because chicken egg is phrased in this way not egg chicken.

255 days ago | Tagged As: The Chicken
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

lets look at the big picture for a second. can the chicken exist without beforehand being an egg? No. Can the egg exist without the help of a chicken? No. therefore, I conclude that the chicken and the egg started existing at the exact same time. one cannot exist without the other. i am not a religious person, but i do believe there is something more sublime and beautiful that made this so. think about it. if you controlled a universe, wouldnt you do the same?

131 days ago | Tagged As: the chicken and the egg came together
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

of course... use comon sense!

with out chickens there would be no eggs at all...

so chickens comes first than eggs!!!

507 days ago
- lights599(2) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

that a good question ill be sure to ask god when i get there.........

454 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

chickens... HENS makes the eggs warm with out any chicken at all... how will eggs turn into a chicken without any hens taking care of it...

WE DONT WANT A DEAD CHICKEN HERE!

507 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

the answer is they are both intrinsic to the field,ie the print in this message is black,but without any contrasting white you wouldnt see it.

yin yang zen buddhism alan watts

432 days ago | Tagged As: The Egg
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

Chicken came first, the egg was still hatching.

421 days ago | Tagged As: The Chicken
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points
I think the chicken clearly had to come first. When God created the earth he created all the animals of the land and sea and birds of the sky. I can't imagine he would just create an egg and leave it to hatch with no chicken to care for it.
630 days ago
- Blacklaser(54) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

How dare you assume you know God's reasoning? Blasphemous.

As soon as you bring God into this debate your argument is null and void since, by God's nature, it is impossible to know what he did or what his intentions were. This entails that the only way this debate can come to a conclusion is through science because science actually deals with things that can be known.

570 days ago
- hseldon10(10) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

"How dare you assume you know God's reasoning? Blasphemous"...

Great argument. And how other way to rebutt an absurd argument than with another absurd argument? "Oh, God must have thought of this because he is good" Re: "Oh, you think you can think like God!? Blasphemous"!

557 days ago
- NikkiHill11(152) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points
I totally 100 % agree.
630 days ago
- lauraorme(122) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points
Great point.... what would a little baby chick do on it's own?? I agree!
630 days ago
- candycraze1(1) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Thank you who ever said the chicken came fist. Of course it did. God made the chicken and the chicken made the egg.

It's that simple!

466 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points
As with most creatures, I believe the chicken evolved from something else, as did the way it reproduced. If I had to take a gander, I would say both the "chicken" and the "egg" were present before they officially became the species as you see it today.
630 days ago
- Blacklaser(54) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

You make a good point but missed the fact that eggs were a very common means of reproduction way before birds even started to evolve, thus the egg clearly came first.

570 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points

The chicken, as evolution would suggest to me that the first primative life forms arose from chemical reactions in the primordial soup of the Earth, and they were not eggs or anything that would hatch into life eventually.

573 days ago
- Blacklaser(54) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

You need to brush up on your knowledge of evolution as well as the origin of life, those are two very different things and your intermingling them leads you to a faulty conclusion. (See the arguments on other side for details)

570 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points

chickens came first before eggs...

as it states in the bible...

god created the world in seven days...

he created chickens but not EGGS!!!

507 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
6 points
C'mon people?! the chicken evolved, like every other species. Eggs were already popular for reproduction by many species way before birds evolved.
I rest my case.
629 days ago
- Blacklaser(54) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Your argument hit the nail on the head, since the question doesn't specify exactly which kind of egg, the egg came first without any doubt.

570 days ago
- DebateMan(443) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points
So what laid the egg that a chicken popped out of? You can't possibly think that a pterodactyl laid an egg one day and a freakin chicken popped out. Imagine the mother's surprise!
627 days ago
- hseldon10(10) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

"So what laid the egg that a chicken popped out of? You can't possibly think that a pterodactyl laid an egg one day and a freakin chicken popped out. Imagine the mother's surprise! "

This is not at all how evolution works. A "proto-chicken" laid the egg for a chicken... And who laid the egg for the first "proto-chicken"... Some sort of proto-proto chicken... And in a long lineage, somehow, dinosaurs and chickens may be related. But it is not a "spontaneous" sort of thing.

557 days ago
- mb96net(9) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

I am always amazed by how few people actually understand evolution. Reptiles had eggs way before chickens. The egg came first. I'll use simple words so you understand...A long time ago a reptile that shared 99.9999999% of its genes with an ancient bird type creature had a baby that mutated into that bird type creature. Maybe that ancient bird type creature was only 99.999% like a chicken, but it had baby birds and one of it's great great great great grand baby birds had a baby that mutated to be more like a chicken (maybe 99.999999% like a chicken). Eventually its lineage mutated into a chicken.

A single animal does not evolve, but it's offspring could mutate and that mutation could benefit it by helping it survive in someway (or not).

The thing that people usually still don't understand at this point is "OK, then which came first the reptile or the egg". If you follow this back eventually there was a multi celled organism that had mutated to produce it's offspring encased in a membrane sack which wasn't exactly like an egg that we think of today, but it was the beginning of an egg. Then it's offspring mutated to create a hard shelled membrane sack for it's offspring. Eventually the mutations made the egg that we know today.

555 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
4 points
The first chicken would have had parents that weren't chickens. Some genetic mutation or random DNA blending would have caused their offspring to be different. So the first thing we could consider a chicken would be whatever was in the egg those pre-chickens gave birth to. In other words, evolution says the egg came first.
629 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

Definitely the egg, I back up the statement ahead of me which states that eggs were around long before chickens were around.

554 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Due to the evolutionary process, it can be said that there was once an egg from non-chicken parents that gave us a chicken. How do we define this egg, then? It seems much fairer to define the egg by what it is than by where it comes from. Hence, since a chicken zygote is inside it, it is to be considered a chicken egg, and thus the egg came first.

Supporting Evidence: Source (science.howstuffworks.com)
571 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

ofcourse the egg comes first...

as it says in the bible that easter eggs is a symbolism of the beggining of life... so that means that the egg comes first than chickens...

the question "what came first? the chicken or the egg?"

it would be nicer if the question would be "which came first? the chicken or the chicken egg?"

and god didnt create the world in seven days... he created the world in hundreds... thousands... of years... so that mean there are creatures who lived before chicken do... dinasours.. they lay eggs... so eggs came first than chicken!

or maybe... a dinasour layed an egg and hatched into a chicken XDDD ahahaha...

see... chickens are abnormal ^____^

507 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Well, it’s still unclear whether chicken eggs or chickens came first (the intended question in the original riddle), said Darla Zelenitsky, a paleontologist of the University of Calgary in Alberta who was the first scientist to closely analyze the dinosaur nest.

But interpreted literally, the answer to the riddle is clear. Dinosaurs were forming bird-like nests and laying bird-like eggs long before birds (including chickens) evolved from dinosaurs.

"The egg came before the chicken," Zelenitsky said. "Chickens evolved well after the meat-eating dinosaurs that laid these eggs."

So the original riddle might now be rephrased: Which came first, the dinosaur or the egg? Meanwhile, the new nest provides some of the strongest evidence in North America in favor of the bird-like egg over the chicken.

Supporting Evidence: Which Came First? Eggs Before Chickens, Scientists Now Say (www.livescience.com)
371 days ago | Tagged As: The Egg
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

I have two points. First: The question did not specify a chicken egg. Prehistoric fish, ones that existed before land animals, probably laid eggs like modern fish. And even if they didn't, you have amphibians, reptiles, insects, and dinosaurs to think about before birds came along.

Second, if it did mean chicken eggs, the process of evolution would have made the egg come first. Evolution works this way: if a mutation appeared that made the animal more successful, it would probably survive to produce many, many little animals with either the same mutation or heterzygous for a recessive trait. When these animals produce little animals, they will have the mutation. And they'll succeed too, and the process repeats. Well, the first modern chicken must have come from two parents who were heterozygous for the last recessive trait, or else they would be the first chickens. And a chicken is an eggs before it is a chicken. Therefore, the egg before the chicken.

219 days ago | Tagged As: The Egg
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  
From a totally evolutionary standpoint, the mutation necessary to create the species of chicken must have occured in either the reproductive organs of the parents of the chicken or during the growth in the egg. Either way, the first evidence of a new species would be in the egg.
EDIT: Nevermind, I didn't see badbee's argument.
585 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

This question is def undefined! without the chicken there can be no egg and without an egg there can be no chicken, so how can you be so positive about which came first.

271 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Oh so where did eggs come from? Chickens? No.

Dinosaurs laid eggs, they were here before chickens. Egg wins.

266 days ago | Tagged As: The Egg
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

the egg came first coz i lyk eggs and chicks

261 days ago | Tagged As: The Egg
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Living things can only evolve through changes in their DNA; they cannot evolve once they have been born and are roaming the Earth. For example, one of us isn't going to wake up one morning with an extra toe - it's just not going to happen. In an animal, such as a chicken, DNA from a male and female chicken meet and combine, forming a zygote. A zygote is a fertilized egg and is the first cell of a new baby chicken. So, the first cell divides countless times to form all of the cells of a complete chicken. Every cell contains exactly the same DNA - the DNA from the zygote - the original cell.

Chickens evolved one of two ways: from non-chickens or by mutations. Chickens could have evolved from non-chickens through small changes. This is caused by the mixing of male and female DNA of non-chickens. Mutations to the DNA could have produced a zygote resulting in chicken evolution. However, these changes and mutations can only affect the chicken at the point where a new zygote is created. This means that two non-chickens mated and the DNA in the new zygote contained the mutations. That one, little zygote cell divided, and divided, and divided, producing the first real chicken.

Before that first real chicken zygote, only non-chickens existed. The zygote cell is located in the chicken's egg. Because the zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations can produce a new animal, the egg came before the chicken.

184 days ago | Tagged As: The Egg
- Avedomni(62) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Two problems with this:

1) Your method of classifying the "first real chicken" raises the problem that any offspring from that "first real chicken" would necessarily be hybrids with the non-chicken species from which it developed, and the "real chicken-ness" of each successive generation would be diluted so that nothing alive today could really be considered a chicken. The problem, of course, is that evolution of species doesn't occur on an individual level; there was no "first real chicken", there was just a gradual change in a population so that, over time, they came to resemble the creatures that today we call chickens.

2) This problem is just one of definitions. Specifically, even taking the rest of your argument as correct, you fail to clarify why a chicken egg is "an egg from which a chicken would hatch" as opposed to "an egg laid by a chicken", and this is really where the solution to the whole chicken/egg question lies: If a chicken egg is an egg from which a chicken would hatch, then the egg came first (else there would have been a chicken, and it would have hatched from an egg, thereby making that egg a chicken egg); if a chicken egg is an egg laid by a chicken, then the chicken came first (else it would have hatched from a chicken egg, which would necessarily have had to have been laid by a chicken).

148 days ago | Tagged As: Define chicken egg
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

i was thinking the chicken came first... then i read everyones view.. my conclusion.. the egg came first..

it makes sense.. the first living organism was probably a cell, more like an egg than a chicken.. then it evolved maybe about a million times to finally create a chicken.. ..

154 days ago | Tagged As: The Egg
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

The egg came first because, I searched on the internet and all of the scientific reasons say that the egg came first because the chickens evovled from non-chickens and the egg made the first chicken.

148 days ago | Tagged As: The Egg
Popular Debates in Science: Nuclear power plants.... U.S. should put an end to war on drugs, legalize pot? Does God really Exist???


bottomAd


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2009 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.