What do you think about the Ken Ham vs Bill Nye Debate?
|
I thought it was pointless. i assumed that since they were pulling in someone with the credentials of Mr. Nye, that they would be pulling in someone to counter his arguments, with equally respectable credentials. I was sadly mistaken, and the debate became the same as everyone else's "Creationism vs Evolution" debate. The intelligent, logical, fact providing person would list all of the flaws with creationsim and how they are countered by the facts presented with evolution, and the less logical religious person would present his favorite book as if that was the answer to everything. That'd be like someone telling me magic does not exist, and I say: "let me show you this Harry potter book, I think it'll change your life" 2
points
2
points
|
