What does Obama do each time Americans are killed? He pushes his anti Gun agenda.
|
What is so ironic according to Obama is that when these terrorist attacks happen elsewhere around the globe it is due to global warming but when they happen here in the USA it is the NRAs fault. California is in a severe drought but yet Obama won't blame global warming for this attack, no it is a gun problem. He is seriously delusional. I guess I should provide the link. Here it is. http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/ 2
points
You are going to have to clarify your statement to make your analogy hold. Your own link shows Obamas reasoning in linking resource shortages exasperated by climate change to acts of terrorism in the middle east. What is your reasoning for linking the climate change or the drought in california to any acts of terrorism in the US? 1
point
I am not linking so called climate change(which was global warning until the climate stopped warming) to anything but Left wing control fanatics. Environmentalists were trying to do the same things 40 years ago when they were crying about global cooling. I heard about Obama's linking climate change to terrorism. It is unbelievable what extremists will say to get their agendas passed. Remember, your premiums will go down and you can keep your health insurance just the way it is. 1
point
4
points
What makes people like you so dangerous is how you have no problem twisting the facts and lying. Have you ever looked at the language on defining what an assault rifle is? Their definition includes hunting rifles. Did you happen to look at the so called safe act legislation in NY! It included banning hunting rifles that had more than seven rounds capacity. What makes people like you so dangerous, is because you are ether the biggest corrupt liar on the planet, or you are the most gullible naive ignorant person on the planet. It matters not which it is. England started out with these nice little gun laws that supposely prevented only certain weapons, and only certain people from getting them. 100 years later they took all their guns. There are Democrats now who admit they want to take our guns. Who do you think you are kidding? Always remember, your premiums will go down, you can keep your health insurance and doctor. There are fools born every minute who believe the lies from politicians on the Left. 2
points
A great point. Not to mention that assault rifles only cause a small fraction of the overall gun deaths in America. If saving lives really mattered, go after the biggest cause of deaths which are small caliber handguns. Going after assault rifles and making cartridge limits are "sensible" bills that pave the way for a complete gun ban. Once we ban assault rifles and the population sees that it does zero to stop gun violence, they will go for a big cartridge limit. And when that does nothing, they will outlaw all but one caliber. And when that still does nothing, they will have no choice but to get rid of the only gun that Americans are still allowed to have. 2
points
This is a problem, but it is not a problem that is specific to the Left. After any tragedy, both sides have been trying to spin it to support their arguments. Those on the right claim that if the victims had guns the tragedy could have been lessened, and those on the left emphasize that more control is necessary to prevent further incidents. Obama doesn't HAVE an "anti-gun agenda". He only wants common sense regulations that "help" keep crazies from getting a gun (especially assault weapons) as easily as one can buy a used car! It may be somewhat difficult for a terrorist to get into the country, but they salivate at the fact that, after they get here, they can purchase any weapons they want! It's as if THEY also have Second Amendment rights! Of course the local domestic abuse hothead also has that right, as well as the guy that has started fights in bars or the workplace regularly, the guy who has threatened the lives of politicians or doctors or their wives/husbands. ALL have 2nd amendment rights with NO restriction. GREAT! Obama has actually passed "gun rights bills". He has NO anti agenda, that's RW propaganda! You can't stop anyone from getting any type of gun they want, just like you can't stop someone from getting heroin or cocaine, which are illegal. If a person wants it badly enough, they are going to get it. Liberals act like gun control will solve these shootings. How about we first try to completely eradicate drugs and then go to guns, would that not make more sense. I mean, more people are opposed to heroin and cocaine than guns. If we can't totally eliminate an illegal, harmful product that addicts still get their hands on then common sense says stricter gun laws won't make any difference either. 1
point
What makes people like you so dangerous is how you have no problem twisting the facts and lying. Have you ever looked at the language on defining what an assault rifle is? Their definition includes hunting rifles. Did you happen to look at the so called safe act legislation in NY! It included banning hunting rifles that had more than seven rounds capacity. What makes people like you so dangerous, is because you are ether the biggest corrupt liar on the planet, or you are the most gullible naive ignorant person on the planet. It matters not which it is. England started out with these nice little gun laws that supposely prevented only certain weapons, and only certain people from getting them. 100 years later they took all their guns. There are Democrats now who admit they want to take our guns. Who do you think you are kidding? Always remember, your premiums will go down, you can keep your health insurance and doctor. There are fools born every minute who believe the lies from politicians on the Left. The point Obama made was that people whose profile would deny them access to a passenger aircraft can go and obtain a gun with relative ease. The latest slaughter presents an argument for both sides of the gun debate. If the issuing of firearm licenses was stringently regulated the number of guns in circulation would be greatly reduced, so, theoretically the opportunity for crazed citizens or radicalized Muslims to obtain weapons would reduce the number of mass murder incidents. On the other side of the coin it can be argued that if more responsible citizens carried legally licensed personal protection weapons the assassins could be killed at an earlier stage to the attack. To naively chirp on parrot fashion about imposing stricter gun laws each time an atrocity occurs will solve nothing and certainly won't stop the Muslims nor the insane from acquiring them. 1
point
So tell me why this person would have been on a do not fly list. Are you saying all muslims are on these lists? NO! These killers would not have been on any do not fly list, and coud have gotten guns. It is a ludicrous argument for Obama to even suggest this woud have stopped the killings. No, Obama's point was that there are people whose security profile,( undoubtedly compiled by one or more of the intelligence agencies) indicates that they could, or in fact actually do pose a threat to public safety. I have no idea if one or both of these particular assassins were on a ''no fly'' list. Obama's anti-firearms comment was meant to be more general and informative by advising the public that there are many people, not necessarily including these two dirt balls, who are on ''no fly'' lists but could, under current legislation, obtain lethal firearms with relative ease. So, the state considers you to represent too great a risk to be allowed on a civilian airliner, but you can go and buy as many firearms as you please. All mass murder atrocities carried out by terrorists were Muslim filth. So, whilst all Muslims are not terrorists, it seems that all terrorists are Muslims. Of course there are assassins who are deranged individuals who massacre 100s of people some of whom may be banned from flying by the aviation authorities, but, like the Muslim terrorists they can purchase guns until the cows come home. My contention is that as it is clear the administrations of the western democracies are incapable of providing their citizens with a safe environment in which to live, and therefore the people should have the absolute right to own weapons for personal protection. 1
point
3
points
3
points
2
points
1
point
1
point
0
points
He never HAD an "anti-gun" agenda. He just wants some common sense regulations to protect Americans as much as possible! Conservatives voting to allow "NO_FLY" terrorists the same Second Amendment rights as Americans is "not" pushing a right wing agenda??? Obama has passed "gun friendly" laws. How well some fall into the rhetoric they are taught to believe! |
