Debate Info

Debate Score:7
Arguments:5
Total Votes:7
Show More Stats

Argument Tags

side graph
 
 Context (2)
 
 to be continued (2)
 
 Purpose (1)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(8879) pic



What is the first order of business for any given language?

language

I say it is to communicate with as little ambiguity as possible. What say you?


Add New Argument
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

There are many words in any given language that have more than one meaning and the meaning is derived from context. However, if we change the meaning of a word so that it is no longer as descriptive as it once was, or if the meaning is no longer derived from context, then we are doing language a disfavor. In other words, we shouldn't blur the definitions of words, we should sharpen it. When we come a cross the urge to obfuscate a word, we sould resist the urge and favor coming up with a new word instead.

376 days ago | Tagged As: to be continued
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

By your argument, grammar should be invalidated because it is entirely contextual.

The alternate to current English grammar would be something similar to classical Latin where a suffix or prefix will denote the grammatical counterpart in English grammar. Such a system defies English as a mongrel conglomerate of different influences, thus would not be 'English' in the true sense.

376 days ago | Tagged As: Purpose
- joecavalry(8879) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Oh, I agree 100% that current English is a conglomerate of different influences.

The point I'm trying to make, however, is that language should strive towards articulation, not move away from it.

376 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Although clarity is an ideal of communication of which I'm personally and professionally fond, language and those who use languages do not consciously take this into consideration. Linguists theorize that language develops from isolated dialects. Isolation does not have to be physical or geographical. There are some groups who find that, due to their political isolation, it is better to be ambiguous than precise. For example, there is a dialect of Irish that combines English and Irish and was used to confuse the British authorities. (I can't recall the name of the dialect off-hand.) The dialect had it's own very creative rules that prevented non-indoctrinated listeners from comprehending.

My main point is that sometimes, the words we use are not as important as the context.

375 days ago | Tagged As: Context
- joecavalry(8879) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

But wait.... that Irish dialect had to unambiguous to them otherwise they wouldn't understand each other.

375 days ago
Popular Debates: Todays world cares too much about feelings Gun-Rights Should people who are morally agaisnt abortions be forced to pay for those who w


bottomAd


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2009 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.