CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
After months of investigations the F.B.I.'s investigation has produced nothing but spiteful innuendos about, people of ''special interest'', and meaningless references to mysterious phone calls.
What we're seeing here is the vindictive character assassination of Donald Trump by a grudge-bearing F.B.I.
Every avenue of investigation the Feds have gone down has led to a dead end but still they relentlessly pursue their vengeful Inquisition with all enthusiasm of a dog devouring a bone.
True.. But, the wheels of justice move SLOWLY.. I WISH they'd move faster too. That they move slowly, though, ISN'T indicative of the outcome..
Besides, you have NO idea how much evidence they have.. I suspect they're waiting until the investigation is over.. Certainly, they're NOT required to disclose their case before they bring it..
I am of the opinion that the way they're conducting the investigation with the ''drip feed'' of deliberately vague information along with a stream of unfounded and thinly veiled accusations is more akin to a dirty tricks campaign than a serious investigation.
Why alert any suspects in advance of their pending interviews?
In such circumstances it is significantly more effective to 'wrong foot'' your suspects by obtaining the proper warrants and arresting them without any prior indication of your intentions on a carefully planned dawn raid.
Questioning them while they're still disorientated and have been denied the opportunity of preparing cover stories is what any law enforcement agency sure of it's ground would have done.
The form of behavior being employed by the Feds has all the hallmarks of a ''psych ops'' tactic designed to gnaw away at the nerves of their target(s) and conducted only when hard evidence is lacking.
You're quite correct when you say I don't know the full extent of their dossier, but I feel this is only because there isn't one of any substance.
In the REAL world, if you (1) THINK there's a crime, you (2) INVESTIGATE.. That's how justice works in this great land of ours.. Don't you watch Law & Order??
But, I'm wondering, if Trump has NOTHING to hide, seems like he'd WELCOME the investigation.. Truly, there may NOT be a crime, and the investigation would reveal that too.. Trump doesn't know this, does he??? The fact is, IF the investigation were STOPPED now like Trump wants it to be, his administration would be CRIPPLED..
But, I'm wondering, if Trump has NOTHING to hide, seems like he'd WELCOME the investigation
1)He did for months. Notta. Now someone else is on it. Notta. He was given a memo that you can look at stating Comey's failures and a request that he be removed.
2)He's obviously a Clinton tentacle, and it's easier to prove than that gravity exists.
1)It's none of those things. It's not even against the law.
2)And the evidence of collusion is... oh wait. They have none.
By this logic, Obama was a Pakistani, Michelle was a Mexican, and Schumer is from the Andramada Galaxy. Proof? No we don't have that, but there's still a controversy about it just cause.
I thought right wingers knew how the law worked... No, huh?? DUDE!
Let's review, shall we? If you THINK a crime occurred, and you HAVE evidence, you don't need to investigate.. But, if you DON'T have evidence, you investigate..
I dunno what's so mysterious about that.. You DO watch Law & Order on the res, don't you?
They had no evidence. They still have no evidence. They've shown us nothing. When asked if they had proof of collusion, the CIA AND the FBI said no. I've watched John Brennan and James Comey's testimonies before Congress. Nothing.
It isn't illegal. They have no evidence. That's what this liberal pipedream hinges on. And even if it were illegal and did happen, he'd be replaced by a Republican. And if you ousted him, another Republican. Essentially, if you got your wish, you'd essentially get us a new President that no one voted on to be President.
Trump should be impeached, NOT because I like or don't like his replacement.. He should be impeached because he broke the law.. It ain't no more difficult than that..
There IS, however, one advantage to Pence or even the boy wonder.. I don't think either of them would start WW III over a tweet..
So you are claiming he broke the law despite collusion actually not being a punishable crime or violation of the law, and there being no evidence shown to us of said collusion. Come now Con.
Let's review, shall we?? FIRST we investigate.. SECOND, IF we find lawbreaking, we levy charges.. Uhh.. We're STILL in phase one. This ISN'T hard stuff..
Yeah, proly... Just like Trump kept his narrative about the Obama birth certificate alive for years.. You feel sorry for the orange man.. I think he's getting his just deserts..
I don't feel sorry for him at all actually. You step into that office, you're fair game and should be. I just find it dangerous that the left and the media offers no discernment or critique if the President is a liberal. That's how they'll get the shock collars on us. I can see the left now.
"Well ya see, he has to put the shock collars on us to force us to be multicultural. He has to put the shock collars on us to force us to be politically correct. He has to put the shock collars on us to force us to accept the welfare state."
