What the Democrat Party does not want you to know. The ignorance from so many proves it.
|
The reason for GoP's 'comprimise' of 20 weeks is not supported by medical science but rather the misrepresntation of medical science. Why should the Democrats compromise and go with a number that is not grounded in medical science but instead ideology? Would you compromise if your opponent set the numbers for you to agree to in a way that misrepresents the facts? Of course not. I addressed you using the wrong numbers of states who allow 'no resrtictions' on abortion and the misrepresentation of the medical fields findings before here. After much kicking and screaming from you, you now apparently use the correct numbers however you still do not address the misreprentation of the medical fields knowledge by the Republicans. In fact this misreprentation by Republicans is now somehow showing the Democrats not wanting to compromise in your eyes. If Republicans want to compromise they should use factual premises. If anything this just shows how unreasonable Republicans are being on this subject. 1
point
It's sad we have so many inhuman people such as yourself. TRULY SAD! No one in their right mind(not bought and paid for by the Abortion lobbyists) would have any problem at all with a 20 week limit(unless extreme case). For the Democrats and people like you to fight it is truly sickening. FIVE MONTHS IS WAY TOO MUCH BUT THE GOP IS ALLOWING IT TO GET A COMPROMISE. The GOP still possess a conscience and understand what it means to kill viable babies as well as any baby in the womb. There are nine states (that I instantly corrected that very day you moron) supported by Democrats so your entire reasoning is absolutely meaningless. Babies have lived as early as 22 weeks so this is why the GOP used 20 week limit. Totally non responsive to my points. No one in their right mind(not bought and paid for by the Abortion lobbyists) would have any problem at all with a 20 week limit(unless extreme case). Your argument is "no one in their right mind would disagree with you." You offer nothing to support your statement but your assertion to do otherwise would be crazy. Your opinion only. But that has nothing to do with my argument that you are avoiding. Let me help you; The Republican party uses 20 weeks as a limit due to the fetus not likely to feel pain. Many Republicans claim the medical field backs them on this however this is 4 to 8 weeks shorter than medical science says a fetus can feel pain. If the Republicans were to represent the findings from the professionals in the medical field truthfully and if the Democrats still won't budge then you will have satisfied your point, but alas that is not the reality of this situation. This misrepresentation by the Republican party is a reflection of how unreasonable Republicans are on the subject and not a poor reflection on Democrats. Babies have lived as early as 22 weeks so this is why the GOP used 20 week limit. The laws that are trying to be enacted deal with when a fetus can feel pain, not when a fetus is viable. But 23 weeks a fetus only has 35% chance of surviving, and 24/25 weeks it goes up to 50% to 70%. You are focusing on statistical outliers and not the norm. If the compromise is to not feel pain as the GOP's attempts at enacting laws are focused on, then 24 weeks would be a compromise. If someone wants to make the argment for 20 weeks they are arguing on the slimmest of chances rather than a statisticaly robust number. I think a slim chance isn't a very good measure when a mothers well being is at stake, nor do I think that focusing on less than 1 percent of abortions really has the womens best interests in mind. I just don't see Republicans efforts here to be reasonable, they misrepresnt medical science or favor extreme odds in the face of a mothers well being. They take the high stakes gamble with the mothers life and well being instead of butting out. This is an example of Republicans overreaching with their governmental powers on a whim. 1
point
|
