Where is the paranoid fear from the Left concerning separation of Press & State?
Separation of press and state? Never heard of it. Must be one of Trumps fake news items. You know, one of those things conservatives always come up with and say it's a "liberal idea". Funny, the only legitimate, GOOD idea they've come up with is the ACA .... That one is ALSO called a liberal idea. Confusing, aren't they?? I will have to say the Affordable Care Act is not so affordable but the Democrats somehow believe that. Looking at the track record of failed CO-OP's that have cost taxpayers more than $1 billion and the CO-OPs that haven’t closed their doors have joined other insurers to hike their premiums. Affordable was never the plan. 2
points
Separation of press and state? Yes, neither have I. It isn't any of the things I found as initially hidden, or those plainly laid out, or the implications. And I've even weighed the things maggot says. Perhaps he's too confused about the separation of "religion and state" and "religion and press". (The second one, being not obvious enough - perhaps overly excited at noticing.) 1
point
Doesn't he ever get tired of acting like the victim? Sure there is media bias on both sides, that's never not been an issue. But as some point, maybe some of the things he believes are out of date, step on the rights of others, or just plain wrong. It's always left this, left that, terrible evil mean lefties....yesh...talk about blame shifting. Trumped up hysteria from the Right doesn't make the allegation of control of the press true. And sympathizing is not control or being controlled. And even influence is not automatically control. Furthermore, now that the Right holds power every criticism you are making could be turned around and applied now to Fox News, the National Enquirer, or any publication in line with Trump Washington. Touche. 1
point
1
point
our religious freedom of expression on public land (protected by the constitution), It isn't protected. Public land (the government) is restricted from endorsing religion according to the constitution. You have admitted this is the case in certain circumstances. (A very serious issue as we see in dictatorships where the Government is in bed with the press) The closest we have seen to this is Trump only allowing news sources he likes to be at an event. Nothing but PURE SILENCE when the biased Liberal press is actively taking sides with the Democrat Party and influencing our Government. The Democrats are not the government. Democrats are the people. The press is supposed to represent the people. The press has to influence the government. It is impossible for it not to. As it stands today we have over 90% of our TV Network news and entertainment biased towards helping the Democrat Party. You have never shown the bias. You have imagined it quite a bit, but never actually shown it. What's it going to take to get the Left to admit how dangerous this is to our nation's freedoms and honest fair elections. 100% of the Press? There is a Republican in the White House, and a Republican majority in both houses of congress. What freedom have you lost? If the shoe were on the other foot, Democrats would be screaming for separation of Press and State. There you go again imagining the problems you claim exist. The reason they say nothing is because the vast majority of the Press is on their side. They have no problem with State supporting media as long as it is Liberal media. Or because they can point to countless articles they would rather not see reported. It's so sickening to watch their phony pioused outrage over privacy issues, concocted separation of church and state issues, etc. Oh yeah. Those things can't possibly exist if they don't complain about the thing you complain about. but when it comes to their side benefitting from very important issues such as non separation between Press and State, they have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER. The state is the government. You are complaining that a political party has power over the press, not the government. You are asking for separation of press and political party. Where is that in the constitution? 3
points
Nothing but PURE SILENCE when the biased Liberal press is actively taking sides with the Democrat Party and influencing our Government. The Democrats are not the government. Democrats are the people. The press is supposed to represent the people. The press has to influence the government. It is impossible for it not to.-------- It looks like they are the government. How else do you think Trump's executive orders were struck down when Obama made the exact same orders with no opposition? 2
points
(A very serious issue as we see in dictatorships where the Government is in bed with the press) The closest we have seen to this is Trump only allowing news sources he likes to be at an event.----- Obama banned Fox News. (Google it) You didn't hear about because your head is stuck up the liberal press's ass. How's it smell in Obama's hole? 2
points
-----As it stands today we have over 90% of our TV Network news and entertainment biased towards helping the Democrat Party. You have never shown the bias. You have imagined it quite a bit, but never actually shown it.----- Well he's right. Now go google it and come back with a full report with links provided. No? I didn't think so. 2
points
2
points
------The reason they say nothing is because the vast majority of the Press is on their side. They have no problem with State supporting media as long as it is Liberal media. Or because they can point to countless articles they would rather not see reported.------ Nope. They are liberal Soros paid hacks. Are you fucking retarded? https://www.mrc.org/commentary/ 1
point
-----The state is the government. You are complaining that a political party has power over the press, not the government. You are asking for separation of press and political party. Where is that in the constitution?----- It's not in the Constitution. Neither is the right to time with the President of the United States. That's why Obama the dipshit clown banned Conservative media outlets. Remember your messiah who wasn't a Muslim, but was a Muslim, but wasn't? 1
point
|