CreateDebate


Debate Info

5
7
circumsized is better non-circumsized is better
Debate Score:12
Arguments:7
Total Votes:12
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 circumsized is better (4)
 
 non-circumsized is better (4)

Debate Creator

tristan12345(14) pic



Whether circumsized penises are better then non-circumsized

Debate the pros and cons of whether circumsized penises is better than non-circumsized!

circumsized is better

Side Score: 5
VS.

non-circumsized is better

Side Score: 7

Man! circumsized is waay better, because it's cleaner and cuts down the amount of cancer in your testicles. Also many girls like circumsized better!

Side: circumsized is better
1 point

I have never been with a man who wasn't circumcised, but the idea sounds distasteful, pun intended!

Side: circumsized is better
1 point

They should cover genital (both) hygiene (normal hygiene too) in K-12. Until they do so (including normal hygiene), genital mutilation is the answer.

Side: circumsized is better
2 points

Redesigning nature is always a bad idea and has it's side effects. Such an act of barbarism which is normally carried out on children who have no input into the mutilation of their body should be outlawed by all civilized nations. Pathetic attempts to justify this pagan ritual include, ' it's more hygienic', which is embarrassing rubbish, as anyone who practices normal standards of personal hygiene will not be at risk of infection whether circumcised or not. Some Don Quixote type character romanticized with the fanciful notion that woman ''prefer it''. What did he do? Carry out a survey of woman who had had sex with circumcised and non circumcised men? How many woman participated in this bazaar survey, and did they, (the female), inspect the male chopper to note it's condition. How many times were they pegged by those with and without circumcision? Did they measure the size of their lover's weapons? Did they keep records? Such a load of unbelievable B.S. The outrageous act of performing of this superstitious abuse of the human anatomy is an affront to the victim's manhood and a blatant insult to god.

Side: non-circumsized is better

It looks more natural. Circumcision is just genital mutilation.

Side: non-circumsized is better

I am old and I am not circumcised.

I have never had any problems with keeping my dick clean and odor free.

I haven't had women complain.

I have had women who were intrigued/curious and that closed the deal.

On the other hand, when fully erect, it forces the foreskin down and it looks circumcised. It's to big for the foreskin to cover the head so it gets stretched below the head.

On the minus side, it is more sensitive. I guess when it is circumcised it develops a callus?

On the plus side, I don't have to jack hammer a woman to come. I can make sweet, gentle love to her.

On the negative side, some women want to get jack hammered.

So, maybe it's a draw. ;)

Side: non-circumsized is better
1 point

i think that the practice of circumcision should be banned. i wish i still had mine.

Side: non-circumsized is better