CreateDebate


Debate Info

2
3
COD Halo
Debate Score:5
Arguments:3
Total Votes:6
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 COD (1)
 
 Halo (2)

Debate Creator

PolicyDebate(116) pic



Which is a better franchise- Call of Duty or Halo?

killer campaign or amazing multiplayer?

COD

Side Score: 2
VS.

Halo

Side Score: 3

Call of Duty has better graphics, making for better gameplay. There are more maps and more weapons in multi-player.

Call of Duty takes single-player hands down. It features a more unique story, it has a variety of missions, and it lasts longer.

You can also learn from COD. Most of the guns in the games are real. After you play the game, you will be able to recognize guns from the game.

Side: COD

Halo's Trueskill ranking system makes it easier to find matches. They have quite an extensive amount of multi-player options and features. It is much quicker and easier to get into games when you're by yourself.

Halo is also more pick-up-and-playable. It takes quite a long time to MASTER grenades, melees, and shooting, but it still has the typical FPS feel that everyone can groove to. In COD, it takes several plays before you even get the feel for it. It has shooting, melee, and grenades, just like Halo, but the weapons, games, and the aiming system are much more complicated than Halo.

Side: Halo

K for one halo is allot fairer if I’m going into a game I would like to be going up agenst people with the same guns that I could have so its the skills being tested not the fact that my gun is bigger then yours. It’s fairer when no mater what level you are the gun will hurt them the same as the next person to shouts it.

Secondly it is way easier and fairer in halo because you are matched with other people according to your skills not just the first people they can find. It sucks when you can’t even get better because you keep playing agents level 50s or what ever when your just new.

Sorry for the spelling

Thanks for reading :p

Side: Halo