Debate Stats:

Debate Score:27
Arguments:11
Total Votes:28
Ends:Never
View More Stats
install flash for graphs
NASCAR F1

Argument Tags:

side graph
All Tags
 
 F1 is faster (8)
 
 Rubbin's Racing (2)
 
 F1 (1)

Debate Creator:

Bradf0rd(854)
pic



Are you trying to figure out how this debate works? Show Quick Tips

Which is the better motor sport?


NASCAR

Side Score: 4
VS.

F1

Side Score: 23
Add New Argument
Add New Argument
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I personally prefer NASCAR to Formula One. While the F1 definitely go faster, I like the rough "rubbin's racing" mentality of the NASCAR drivers and find the sport to be much more entertaining. F1 seems to me to be very elitist and doesn't seem to have the mass appeal in the US as it does in other countries. Besides, the mullets at NASCAR races are incomparable.

Posted 145 days ago | Tagged As: Rubbin's Racing
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

NASCAr is better,in the USA not many F1races are on tv unless you have cable and how amny drivers name's can you prenounce. faster is not better when you want crashes and excitment. I have to go with NASCAR on this one.

Posted 143 days ago | Tagged As: Rubbin's Racing
- pic Bradf0rd(854) Opposed
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Demolition derbies, WRC, Monster truck racing, Baja... Those are all destructive forms of racing, why not follow those if you are looking for wrecks? I mean, if you're less interested in talent and more interested in the lack of it... Why not something like that?

The speed channel shows every grand prix in the season, if you have access to that, there you go. The names are only hard to pronounce if you don't even know how to speak english well. I'm not saying faster is better, the competition is better.

Posted 143 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

F1 has improved a little over the past two or three seasons, as changes have been made to deliberately limit the technology and create a more level competition.

But its still the case that, basically, whoever gets to the first corner first is going to control the race. Unless there is bad weather, or someone mucks up a pit stop, there is very little chance to overtake. In fact, some of the tracks (Monaco being an obvious case in point) have nowhere to overtake - unless you can get past whilst another car is in the pits

By contrast NASCAR has numerous overtaking, and with very similar cars the emphasis is on driver skill not just who happens to have enough sponsors to get a seat in one of the few cars that are always at the front. Even as a UK resident, I'd rather watch NASCAR on TV. It always seems to have more excitement, and more interest. In fact, I'd like to make a trip over to see something like the Daytona 500 live, it looks totally awesome

Posted 142 days ago
- pic Inkwell(320) Opposed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

NHRA beats them both

Posted 38 days ago | Tagged As: F1
Vote Up Vote Down
4 points

The "better" aspect of F1 racing is that the cars race at high speeds (360 km/h or 225 mph). The cars are capable of pulling up to 5g in some corners.

Formula One indicates that it is intended to be the most advanced and most competitive of the FIA's racing formulae.

Supporting Evidence: Formula Racing Redux (en.wikipedia.org)
Posted 144 days ago | Tagged As: F1 is faster
- pic Bradf0rd(854) Favored
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

Acceleration

0-62 mph in.... 2 sec

0-124 mph in.. 3.9 sec

0-186mph...... 8.6 sec

1.25g's on acceleration up to about 124mph

Deceleration

Usually around 4g's, but in extremes can be 5-6g's. At speeds above 90mph, the down force produced by the car is responsible for 1g when not accelerating.

Drivers have said many times that braking hard enough will pull tears out of their eyes and sweat from their face, which obstructs their view through the visor on their helmets.

Cornering

Even without slick tires (which were banned by the FIA to limit cornering traction), the cars can hold with 5-6g's because of the aerodynamics.

On turn 8 at the Istanbul Park, a 190° relatively tight 4-apex corner, in which the cars maintain speeds between 265 km/h (165 mph) and 285 km/h (in 2006) and experience between 4.5g and 5.5g for 7 seconds .

--------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------

How is that not the most awesomist sh*t you've ever heard?

Posted 144 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
4 points

F1 actually involves some semblance of skill. I know for some people in the south it might be hard to turn left on a consistent basis, but face it, driving in a circle is not that exciting.

Posted 123 days ago | Tagged As: F1 is faster
Vote Up Vote Down
4 points

F1 FTW !! i'd rather watch that than watch a bunch of cars making left turn after left turn.

Posted 113 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

F1.... it's less.... red-neckish ;)

Posted 144 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Formula 1 is commonly known as the pinnacle of motorsports, but in America it's hard to find anyone who cares about it. IMHO Nascar is only good for one thing, endurance, and even then there are better sports out there to test endurance... no one cares. It's all about NASCAR and it makes no sense to me. This is the reason I started this debate. I want to know why people love this sport so much, or at least to find out if there are more people out there in America who find Formula 1 to be the better motorsport. I live in Bakersfield Ca, which is a big place for NASCAR, so I may only see so many NASCAR freaks because of this.

I love the complexity of F1, and the evolution of the sport is something that I rarely see, especially at such a quick pace, in any other motorsport.

Also, I like watching races to see all of the creative competition involved with it, not to see wrecks... I don't understand why anyone would watch a race to see wrecks, there's something out there for that and it's called a demolition derby.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula_One

Posted 144 days ago


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Newsletter Archive
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Sharing Tools
Send Beta Invites
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Legal Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Creative Commons

©2008 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.