CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
White atheist shooter , black religious hero
**About the Las Vegas Shooting**
Had a black guy been the shooter, these guys will be conjuring a million theories about how dangerous these negros are and totally demonise them.
This time the white guy did it, and they like the colour to be ignored....okay fine...there was a hero and rather contrary to their anti negro unfounded theories, it was a negro saviour, and that, they won't equally make noise about it like had he been a/the negro shooter.
And now unto the atheists, this is what happens when you call life purposeless(unplanned,not designed, no aim). The guy does not even respect his own life. I won't be surprised if next time it was quantumhead, Antrim, greenache, dermot,Mack, etc...in action...
A society bringing up kids as atheists is a society grooming a generation of terrorists....more of these guys yet to come.....Europe and America...
How would you now deal with your terrorists and jihadists at the same time.....doom...
Atheism must be abolished the first reason is for environmental security and secondly because it has not an iota of sense in it.
Let me bring you into the real world, where you have to speak and think like an adult in order for things to make sense.
Scenario A: A white man shoots and kills 60 people.
Response: Public is horrified, man is either jailed, killed, or takes the coward's way out.
Conclusion: The public deeply hates this white man who killed 60 people.
Scenario B: A black man shoots and kills 60 people.
Response: Public is horrified, main is either jailed, killed, or takes the coward's way out.
Conclusion: The public deeply hates this black man who killed 60 people.
OVERALL CONCLUSION:
It doesn't matter if you're black, white, or anything else. Regardless of the colour of your skin, if you shoot and kill 60 people, the majority of the American population is going to call for your imprisonment or death.
Usually there is a clear motive as to why someone just ups and murders 60 people, we are still trying to figure out why. It simply wasn't any of the "usual" reasons but in the end he is still just a supreme asshole who deserved to die and should have done so before he decided to murder so many innocent people.
I have no idea what you are talking about. If you are accusing me of racism, some evidence would be nice.
What you said about atheism was incoherent, I couldn't make sense of it.
I don't see how one could abolish atheism, as it is simply a lack of belief (in any god(s)/God). It is only possible to abolish things which exist in a formal sense, like an organisation. Do you have a problem with freedom of religion?
Jeffrey is a real African, in Africa I believe. I know what he is saying about atheism, he's not being incoherent. I don't pick on foreigners too much over their poor English skills...it's a tricky language.
Lol.. not at all tricky. Infact there are people i know that speak that good english you wouldn't realise they are african foreigners until they choose to open up to you. And with such people i would rather speak in a local dialect to.
I personally, am not compelled by anything to speak sophisticated grammar English as i am only using English(Globalisation) but not speaking English.
I am using English for everyone here's good not mine.
You can't as goodly speak my Twi, Ewe, Fante, Akuapem, Mente, and etc.....(nothing compels you, you will only use it for the good of Africans among a community of Africans of a common language, that you might fortunately be able to communicate to an extent....you are using it, not speaking).
" There are people I know who speak such good English, you wouldn't realize that they are African foreigners....."
And I have known many African migrants and quickly learned to tell that they are not native to America. Funny thing about them, none of them whine about whitey oppressing them or making them victims. They don't understand what blacks are crying about all the time.
".........with such people, I would rather speak in a local dialect."
or...."I would rather speak to such people in a local dialect".
I don't want to speak any language other than English. Mrs. Trump speaks nine languages fluently, that's wonderful, and good for you if you can speak a few but your English is not fluent.
Funny thing about them, none of them whine about whitey oppressing them or making them victims. They don't understand what blacks are crying about all the time.
Yeah, true i think.
My uncle has been in the U.S for 15yrs and has never complained about racism.(He actually used to work with whites here before he left)
Two of my cousins studying in the U.S for 6 and 4years each, never complained about racism.
Infact i can say three but the first of the three has already graduated and she's working here.
Still, i am not a better judge of what is going on there....because i must gather facts from different perspectives........which apparently aren't available to me because i can read the news but i don't have real experience.
Reading the news usually means you are reading propaganda put out by people who hate America while they pretend they love the freedom of speech allowed in America.
atheism is not a lack of belief, it is belief that there is no God....it is a statement of belief. You pick on Jeffry's English, yet you take the nonsensical atheistic mantra which is supposed to sound intelligent while it twists the English language in it's effort to distort the fact that it is the belief that there is no God.
"atheism is not a lack of belief, it is belief that there is no God"
That simply isn't true. Look up the definition. Call me an agnostic if you like, it makes little difference to me. Either way, I don't have a belief that there is no God, I just don't believe that there is God or a god(s).
I didn't pick on Jeffrey's English, I just stated the fact that (at least to me) it was incoherent - that is, unclear.
An atheist believes there is no God. Say it however you want, you don't sound any more intelligent, in fact you sound less intelligent, when you say "I have no god belief". The statement itself is a statement about God, so it is self contradictory, a logical fallacy which somehow becomes the modern atheistic mantra as they all applaud and imitate each other pretending they have the unanswerable answer which in reality is nothing...atheism is a whole lot of nothing in which people make fools of themselves denying God.
How come I know what Jeffrey was saying and you do not? I will tell you why...it's because you are too busy trying to feign intelligence in denying God. As atheism has increased in recent decades, so has all kinds of perversion, tattoos, horrible crimes and mass murders. Society falls apart as atheism increases and that is Jeffrey's point which I think was pretty well stated.....and you could not see past your parroted mantra of "no god belief", so you insulted Jeffrey by calling him incoherent.
Atheism is incoherent, that is why they always have to twist things around to avoid simple clear statements. "I have no god belief" is nonsense, it is a statement about God while pretending to have no belief about God.......trying to deny the simple fact that the atheist believes there is no God. "I have no god-belief" is a self-contradictory statement. Nothing Jeffrey said was self contradictory, it was coherent and logical. Atheism is neither.
If a person never hears the story of Santa Claus, then they do not believe Santa exists. If they do hear the story of Santa Claus, but do no believe Santa exists, then they have an affirmative belief that Santa does not exist.
" If they do hear the story of Santa Claus, but do no believe Santa exists, then they have an affirmative belief that Santa does not exist."
I see no evidence for that. Why can't they just be waiting for more evidence that Santa exists? I remember when I was young, and I wanted to stay up the whole night to see if Santa would come. I neither believed nor disbelieved his existence, I was just waiting to see what would happen. I may have thought one possibility more likely than the other, but I believed neither. Another example would be tossing a coin, I don't 'believe' it will land on heads, but that doesn't mean I believe it will land on tails. I'm just waiting for it to land. Same goes for God and atheism.
Which religion hosts the belief of the existence of santa clause? Why are you being a hypocritical illiterate as if you do not know how santa claus originated...... Which part of any religious book or doctrine encourages the belief in the existence of a santa clause.
Santa is not a belief(at least not something serious enough). It is for kids. Kids believe anything, Barney, bob the builder , barbie , superman etc........
Present something matured for a discussion on belief.
Considering your complete misunderstanding of what Was conveyed by what I wrote, and your apparent ignorance of definitions of the insults you sling, you’re in no position to judge the literacy of others on this site.
Means you are pretending to be an illiterate; for convenience sake; that you are an atheist; in order to help you win more arguments.....ignorance strategy.
Everybody knows santa claus is not a belief. It is to entertain kids and even the pope knows that.
Santa claus is like Barney, Bob the builder, etc but he is just labelled in christmas fashion. What is the nationality of santa ? American? so it's an American festival like halloween. Everything santa claus is American because snow does not fall everywhere, everything suitable for santa to function correctly is American fashion(environmental conditions) and has nothing to do with the actual birth of christ. Christ is israelite why is santa American?
Santa is American mythology just like 'bloody mary' well promoted over centuries.
Saint Nicholas(turkish) is long dead and gone and has nothing to do with the birth of christ.
If santa claus is a belief then so is superman and barbie.(i can cite a living barbie and superman)
Hypocritical illiteracy is not that intelligent .....try another strategy.
Most of what you say is illogical gibberish , I was going to ignore this latest rant from you but it's just brute ignorance and deserves criticism .
How does one go about pretending to be illiterate ?
To win arguments one for convenience sake says they're an atheist as it helps them win arguments , 😳 Maybe you should try it some time ?
Your ignorance about the historicity of Santa Claus is typical as you're iignorant about everything really , allow me to educate you .....
From Wiki .....
How St. Nicholas Became Santa Claus
Santa in different color outfits
In the 16th Century in northern Europe, after the reformation, the stories and traditions about St. Nicholas became unpopular.
But someone had to deliver presents to children at Christmas, so in the UK, particularly in England, he became 'Father Christmas' or 'Old Man Christmas', an old character from stories plays during the middle ages in the UK and parts of northern Europe. In France, he was then known as 'Père Nöel'.
In some countries including parts of Austria and Germany, present giver became the 'Christkind' a golden-haired baby, with wings, who symbolizes the new born baby Jesus.
In the early USA his name was 'Kris Kringle' (from the Christkind). Later, Dutch settlers in the USA took the old stories of St. Nicholas with them and Kris Kringle and St Nicholas became 'Sinterklaas' or as we now say 'Santa Claus'!
Many countries, especially ones in Europe, celebrate St. Nicholas' Day on 6th December. In Holland and some other European Countries, children leave clogs or shoes out on the 5th December (St. Nicholas Eve) to be filled with presents. They also believe that if they leave some hay and carrots in their shoes for Sinterklaas's horse, they will be left some sweets.
St. Nicholas became popular again in the Victorian era when writers, poets and artists rediscovered the old stories.
In 1823 the famous poem 'A Visit from St. Nicholas' or 'T'was the Night before Christmas', was published. Dr Clement Clarke Moore later claimed that he had written it for his children. (Some scholars now believe that it was actually written by Henry Livingston, Jr., who was a distant relative of Dr Moore's wife.) The poem describes St. Nicholas with eight reindeer and gives them their names. They became really well known in the song 'Rudolph the Red nosed Reindeer', written in 1949.
You said Santa was " American mythology " now you attempt to weasel out , you should thank me for educating you .
That's not the point you're trying too avoid further humiliation, so for a ' belief system ' to qualify it has to be hosted by an organisation 😂 So it cannot be qualified for discussion ?
On a site where every interaction requires reading, how does one “pretend to be illiterate”
As for the rest of your post, I hope it took some time for you to write because it is completely irrelevant to anything I was discussing. The person my post was directed at understood perfectly what I was conveying. You intervened and accomplished nothing but a humorous display of angry ignorance.
Your premise is not valid that is the point. Santa claus is not a belief....with that, the rest of what you said is junk.
He understood because he agrees with you on the premise(which is wrong), had he disagreed with the premise, the rest of the junk wouldn't make sense also.
He accepted one false premise and the other followed.
Which religion hosts the belief of the existence of santa clause? Why are you being a hypocritical illiterate as if you do not know how santa claus originated...... Which part of any religious book or doctrine encourages the belief in the existence of a santa clause.
Atheist and agnostic is the same thing, regardless of dictionary definitions. Agnostics simply put on an air of superiority pretending that agnosticism is philosophically better than atheism when they are the same thing. Both deny God, one outwardly and the other deceitfully.......and both depend on logical fallacies, self-contradiction, and self-deceit.
"A belief that there is no God" and "I just don't believe that there is God" are the same thing...you are feigning intelligence by twisting meanings and grammar to avoid the simple fact that you believe there is no God. You are trying so hard, you mutilate the English language with twisted sentence structure and deceptive usage of grammar. You do not argue against God who created all things, you argue against something you refer to as "there is God" like "there is water" or "there is air". You create a straw man which is not God and argue that the thing you don't believe is God cannot be God.
Atheism is self-deception.......it's mindless.....you have to shut down half of your brain to be an atheist, and keep that half empty behind a mental block wall behind which you feel you are keeping yourself safe away from God.
The thing is, dictionary definitions do matter when we are arguing about what a word means. That's why dictionaries were invented.
I'm not going to debate with you about the differences between "A belief that there is no God" and "I just don't believe that there is God." If you can't understand how they are different this is a futile debate.
Here's the rub...if you really are an agnostic and believe it is not possible to know God is there, or to know God is not there......then you better find out because you are in trouble if He is there. The truth of the matter is that you don't want to find out, so you really are not an agnostic. You cling to the belief that there is no God, agnosticism is the same thing as atheism UNLESS you are actually honestly seeking God...but you have made it pretty clear that you want God to be void, atheist to the core.
You're just playing semantics pretending like it makes your opinion and beliefs superior. It's self-deception, atheism is an empty philosophy based on nothing...and agnostic is the same thing. I am well aware of the dictionary definitions, understanding the two was a large part of one semester in college.
Atheism is so bone headed they have to try to sound intellectual by saying "I have no god-belief", a self contradictory statement which tries to hide the fact that you believe God is not there. It never ends, atheist just dodge and mince words because they are afraid of the truth...the truth being that they need to repent of their sins and be saved from Hell.
It is not me who lacks understanding, it is people like you who are in denial so strongly that they cannot acknowledge truth.........and if waking up in the fire of Hell is the only way you will believe Hell is fire on sinners forever, that's the way you will have it. Being an atheist or an agnostic cannot save you and cannot keep you out of Hell.
So when an atheist does something bad, at least if his atheism was a cause as you seem to say it was, you think atheism should be abolished. Following that logic, when a Christian does something bad because of their Christianity (as has happened many times before), should Christianity be abolished?
Before someone starts an action especially such an atrocious(don't call it merely bad it's an underestimation) type, it began from his beliefs and then affects his mental state.
He didn't do this for personal hate because he also killed himself. That is the psychy of an atheist; There is no planner(God), or plan for man, no purpose, we just a bag chemicals , the religious do's and don'ts are delusions breeding from a myth and nobody will hold anybody responsible, we are just a few seconds away from death.
Then he just grabs a gun like pinata and starts sharing bullets like toffees.bullet candy party.
This is not just me but a video on youtube of a similar loco atheist posted up on here also says the same as this guy admits to attempting to kill his dad with a hammer while he was sleeping and so many other things just because of the way he used to think.
All it takes an atheist is sudden desire and mastered courage to finish a terror goal/mission.
Because he had by then long ago suppressed and died the hell, morals, God, purpose aspects to consider .....
I'm not at all saying that an atheistic/nihilistic view can't lead to such actions, merely that other views, like religious views, can lead to the same actions. If you do not think this is grounds for outlawing religion then I don't see how you can think it is grounds for outlawing atheism.
The enemy you can't see is dangerous than the one you can see.
We know religions(organised groups) that encourage terrorism and can be traced to their hide outs. The U.S and other countries are currently smoking them out now. Had the las vegas guy been a religious terrorist, he could have been deteced, exposed and arrested before he could have ever executed his mission.
But if it's the regular atheist guy born and bread in the country, been law abiding for the past 50yrs and with him there is no cause for alarm or any individual or security agency to be on guard, which could be you or any other atheist here and just one day his mind swaps and goes loco perhaps from some little provocation somewhere known or unkwon, intra or inter....woe unto whoever is purposefully or coincidentally within the target.....because no security agency can save you then....look the guy even killed himself, who are you going to prosecute??
Atheists terrorists take all by surprise; capricious.
According to reports, he had so many guns(sophisticated types too) in his hotel room and even more in his home.....imagine that!!!
How many of such undetectable terrorists are in the hiding waiting for the perfect loco time to strike....
Would you be striked or be the striker again when it (can) happen(s)?
"We know religions(organised groups) that encourage terrorism and can be traced to their hide outs."
Yet those attacks are not always prevented. Plenty of people can become religious extremists without being in a traceable organisation anyways.
Either way, how on Earth would you abolish atheism? Seeing as it is not a traceable organisation, I see no way to do it. Would you force everyone to go to church? That wouldn't help, it would probably lead to terrorist attacks in retaliation. Atheism can't be abolished, it is in the mind. Unless the government can control our minds there's nothing you can do.
Yeah churches can take the burden of blame and followed sanctions whenever there is a terrorist attack by it's church member.
All of them should sign up into a church and recorded by the government. Even if an atheist doesn't believe in God, the constant rebuke on immoral acts, teaching about love etc will by all means get to them over months and years and will take more mental energy(8times as much) for one to commit such a terror attack.
But the devil among devils will easily do evil.......that's paddock
The guy was a nutcase psycho on a suicide mission, it had noting to do with race. Why are you trying to make a racial issue of it?
A black man shot up a church recently, I think it was in North Carolina or Tennessee.......I lived in both of those states and the shooting happened not far from where I live, can't remember which state....seems like it was in or near Antioch, Tennessee. He shot a bunch of white people and I don't remember anybody trying to turn it into a race issue. The black man was a US citizen or resident for twenty years, from Sudan or Somali or some place...here most of his life from his childhood up.
Why do blacks have to try to make everything about race? It's because you are programmed to feel like you are being oppressed by whitey. You need to get over it.
I am only wondering why the guy who will conjure theories to demonize blacks had the hitman been black and still claim non-racist won't use the same traditional standards of judgement in the same manner when the skin colour/suit for violence changes from black to chameleon white.
It has taken them too long this time...Antrim………etc. Breaking character of the traditional set(by themselves) standards for judgement ...when the colour ain't black ....is it bias or apparently the racist he says he ain't?
Put a somolian anywhere on the continent, his culturally and genetically influenced aggression will never fail him. After checking his background to know how many blacks he might have attacked before entering the church full of whites, you will effortlessly understand it was never personal. You can give this guy your house, he might forget it by the slightest provocation even if you didn't provoke him; you are still a potential victim of his rage. Run.
You are still trying to make it always about race and it is not always about race.......blacks in America, generally, make everything about race, and you are trying to fan the flames of racism. Shame on you.
you are trying to fan the flames of racism. Shame on you
I have studied the tradition and culture of the demonising theorists (provided : they insist they are not racist) and in this case it's taking them too long. If they don't talk about it, then now it is evident they are racists and if they do, i have beeen wrong about them all along and they are not racists.
That's what i want to prove/clarify.
It is not really personal with this particular las vegas incident, i just needed a valid example for an argument and i got one...haven't i?
They should just ma(e)n up and say they are racists. They talk, act racist and want us to believe they aren't.
From age 10 to 18 i have been in the fellowship of many whites.
I met racism on CD and i am trying to understand the culture such people.
It seems they have double standards in violence incidences.
Depending on the attacker's identity, they sometimes want us to blame the amount of Melanin but in others they want us to ignore Melanin and judge the entire personality. Why are they of double standards?
So next time when a case comes up, which standard are we using?
You are deliberately missing the apparent point i have made that has nothing to do with me being racist(rather to destroy racism on CD); to help you easily acccuse me of this:
You are playing yourself as the victim.(your escape route)
When first of all i do not live in America
and secondly i have never played victim in my life, no matter how bigger the intimidater is than me i would rather die in a fight than get bullied...
i hate crying and paranoia.
Quit whining about your color.
I live among blacks only on my continent, what is America taking from me to cause me to whine....
You're letting people pull your strings. They are baiting you into useless arguments.
Why are you going on and on and on about race? Get over it. We are all one race, of one blood, the Adamic race. Just get over it...color does not matter, you are making color an issue in everything when it is not an issue in everything.
My preference list of people i will like to mingle with on the entire American continent:
1. Hispanics/Mexican/Brazil
2.European decents
3. African Americans
African Americans last because they are racist to pure African blacks.
They have a superiority attitude towards sub saharans.....
In BET Awards, they give awards to African artistes backstage that is 2hours before the actual shows begins...for that reason many African artistes have severally boycotted the awards.
Because it is outright insult.
Mayweather insulted Africa.
M.J said something insulting to cote d'voire.
Some start their music career only two years in America and they feel they are better than a talent with about 5yrs career in Africa with even more awards than they have and expect to be begged by the sub saharan before he the Afri~Ameri accepts a music deal with him.
On the other awards hosted in America or Europe by whites give Awards to sub saharan Africans on live stage. Giving equal respect to the european and african artistes.
The funny thing is had it been an African American getting an Award backstage, there would have been some racist out cry from these same guys. So they know it is disrespectful yet they want to do it to others.
So i would rather roll with a white guy than these disrespectful black Americans.
However, that will not stop me from being objective when they have valid(i can't prove it so i limit to only what i see on Create debate not the entite USA) complains.
Look even obama(maybe he won't say it) Feels he is better than some class of blacks in America.
The blacks are racist, Some mexicans are racist, some whites are racist, some asians(i have had an entire north korean family as my friend they are awesome) especially indians,Arabs, chinese are racist....racism isn't dead....but i only juggle issues fairly/objectively/not being biased.
My kind of politics is not the regular you see everyday, it is self developed...you donot have a good scope over it because it is not old like the other popular ones for you to have studied it well to understand...i wont blame you.
I am talking about triangles and you keep insisting circles.
You cannot watch and do nothing while two people are at each other's throat and say you love jesus...
you live among humans.. your neighbours... your kind... your brothers and sisters whom God has a plan for.
So just because they are not christians you are not going to do anything to bring peace between them, you have already condemned them as hopeless.
Jesus interfered in a matter of a prostitute(a paid fornicator).
Jesus ensured ceasar's taxes were paid had he said otherwise , people would have been influenced not to pay and there would have been disorder.(Jesus played good politics; human affairs)
There are lost people who have different understanding of the world and you have to tap into their understanding and resolve issues just like jesus did(he tapped into the sense tax collection makes to humans not just God(tithe)). At least there will peace on earth. If you reserve your understanding and the peace it brings for only christians it is not right....you were once like them, it is selfishness.
Even though jesus told the canaanite woman "the food of the children are not given to the dogs", yet he made a miracle happen for her.
My judgement/justice is like:
On saturday there was a gas explosion around my community and by His grace i escaped.
My sister was mad at her boyfriend for calling her sunday evening instead of earlier to check up on her.
But i supported his boyfriend instead of my own sister because he simply did not hear the news...he was in church the saturday evening(when it happened), he went home slept to prepare for sunday morning church plus he is doing his national service at about 30 towns far from ours, he heard it late... i will support him instead of my sister's mantra.
It doesn't also mean i will always support him even if he is wrong...
it is called justice/fairplay/being objective.
You are a christian(fine) but living among humans....who is your neighbour? You can't disregard your neighbours plight and say you love God.
Human affairs matter. Just be fair the position of every benevolent person especially christians. Constantly siding a particular position blindly is politics and not being objective.
You will take a ride from a neighbour who is not christian while you are stranded but won't resolve the same neighbour's quarrel with another just because they are not christians??
That is what you are asking of me.
By the way you brought in christianity. I just wanted to talk commonly.
The topic was race.....you have a problem with race and your making it for yourself.
You are not preventing racism. You are not changing anybody's opinion or attitude regarding race. We are all of one blood, we are all one race, the Adamic race. Get over your skin color, and get over the skin color of others.
Why are you responding to my post? You know you are too foul mouthed for me to read.......and too much of a cry baby. Go cry to Andy some more about me telling you that you are on your way to Hell and only God the Savior, Jesus Christ, can and will save you if you will a) admit you have sinned against God and deserve His punishment, even eternity frying like a sausage in Hell b) believe Jesus is God who died for your sins, and rose from the dead bodily willing to forgive you if you believe on Him, and c) call on God in prayer for Jesus to be your savior, and receive Him by faith from your heart and He will give you a new heart, a new life, and you will have eternal life and Heaven will be your home....but no, you prefer to fry like an eternal sausage in Hell rather than to admit your sins are wrong and worthy of death...right? I'm afraid so.
Quit being a cry baby. If you don't like what I say, don't read my posts. I don't read yours, never more than a couple words. I learned that you are vulgar and profane and dirty so I don't want you in my face. You need to get saved from Hell.
You need to see a psychiatrist because you are mentally ill. And to think they arm nutcases like you in the US!! You're a school shooting just waiting to happen.
Takes you to turn this into a race issue and also an attack on atheists who you seem to hate with an irrational rage .
You said .........
And now unto the atheists, this is what happens when you call life purposeless(unplanned,not designed, no aim). The guy does not even respect his own life. I won't be surprised if next time it was quantumhead, Antrim, greenache, dermot,Mack, etc...in action......
My reply ......
What atheist is calling life purposeless and why are you associating purpose with 'design' you're a totally dishonest individual the way you attempt to associate terms that are not related , whys that ?
Why would I who am anti gun buy a gun to slaughter people religious terrorists do enough of that already don't they ?
You say .....
A society bringing up kids as atheists is a society grooming a generation of terrorists....more of these guys yet to come.....Europe and America...
How would you now deal with your terrorists and jihadists at the same time.....doom...
Atheism must be abolished the first reason is for environmental security and secondly because it has not an iota of sense in it........
My reply .....
How does a lack of belief in a god aid in bringing up terrorists ? The opposite seems to be the case with religious terrorism now worldwide and it seems a belief in god is all that's needed to get people to bomb countries and carry out slaughter throughout the world .
It's rather amusing you claim atheism has not an iota of sense in it and this coming from you who can barely type a sentence without spiralling into a rant of religious lunacy as you've just posted
The shooter spent decades of his life as a high stakes gambler. That's neither an atheist nor religious thing, people from both walks of life participate in it. But compared to the rest of society, they are a miniscule subgroup. There is nothing typical about this guy which allows us to fairly generalize to the rest of society. The closest you could come to that would be to argue we simply shouldn't have places like Vegas where people gamble with enormous sums of money.
