CreateDebate


Debate Info

5
4
confederates Nazi
Debate Score:9
Arguments:8
Total Votes:12
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 confederates (4)
 
 Nazi (4)

Debate Creator

GenPaulus(96) pic



Who's side would you be on?

confederates

Side Score: 5
VS.

Nazi

Side Score: 4
2 points

confederates wanted slaves but that isnt even what they fought for! they fought because of sectionalism

Nazis fought because they thought jews were inferior, that they should be destroyed. so confederates definitly

Side: confederates
1 point

You all have good points however right now blacks outnumber jews 14:1

And so I think hurting less people is better. I'm not a nazi but think how many more people the confederates would kill and enslave if they won? I mean right now blacks and whites equally populate the usa about a 110,000,000 of each what if they won? Well it would be about 140,000,000 to 8,170,000 Slaves I think if you talk To a black person they'ed agree. (I'm not a racist)

Side: confederates
debator97(37) Disputed
1 point

i understand but confederates werent members of the kkk; they didn't kill people. in fact, that wasnt their goal! the civil war was because the confederates divided. if they would have won, they would have stayed a different country. they would have kept slaves. but they would not ha ve murdered all the slaves! they needed them. If the Nazis would have won, they would have gont to their "Final Solution" and would have murdered all the jews, along with gypsies, homosexuals, disabled people, and for the record, even probably blacks!

Side: confederates
GenPaulus(96) Disputed
0 points

Btw the confederates did not just enslave you need to study pre-civilwar united states to know the full story wich I did a bit of not that much but I read 19 books on it and I studied for 4-5 months

Side: nazi
1 point

The Confederates, in general, wanted slavery, but to somehow suggest that it's anything like Nazism is quite idiotic.

Slaves were not rounded up and murdered. They were not subjected to terrible, torturous experiments. In fact, many of them were treated better than the Blue collar workers of the North (not a large majority, but a lot).

Side: confederates
1 point

That's true in many ways... I just think less people harmed is better... in thes outh people, aka slaves were beaten to death all the time. At the end of each day about 300-800 people were killed wich is a lot because back then the us population was very small at a point only 983,092 and still hundreds were killed. The confederates were the nazi of their time.

Side: confederates

I would have to give my vote to the confederates on this one. While I am against slavery, in any form. There were slaves who ,after being freed, chose to stay with their former owners as they had a near family relationship with them. This was called a bond servant. I have not heard of one jew who would say the same about a nazi.

Side: confederates
-1 points

The confederates enslaved blacks the Nazi peoples enslaved jews, there are more blacks as of today so I think spreading misery to the least amount of people as possible is the best choice. And don't say the nazi killed them not enslaved because they both killed their prisoners but they both still enslaved them. The #1 cause of death was labor. I studied WWII for 5 years

Side: nazi