CreateDebate


Debate Info

5
5

Jill Morgenthaler (D)


Peter Roskam (R)

Debate Score:10
Arguments:10
Total Votes:10
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 
Jill Morgenthaler (D)
(5)
 
 
Peter Roskam (R)
(5)

Debate Creator

CreateDebate(732) pic



Who should I vote for in the 2008 Illinois 6th District House of Representatives Race?


Jill Morgenthaler (D)

Side Score: 5
VS.


Peter Roskam (R)

Side Score: 5
1 point

Congressman Roskam is a McCain supporter who can easily use Morgenthaler's 2004 service in Iraq against her if she is not careful to explain what led her to volunteer in an unconstitutional war. Morgenthaler should also keep emphasizing the importance of bipartisanship on this and other issues, thereby giving herself a chance to prove that she will make possible more laws like McCain-Feingold in ways that Roskam would not.

Side:
Jill Morgenthaler (D)
1 point

"My opponent, Congressman Roskam is perfectly content to help big oil hoard their profits at the expense of the American people. He talks about helping people, and then votes for his friends in Big Oil."

Unlike "Rubber Stamp Roskam", Morgenthaler refuses to support big oil and energy speculation. Roskam is a long-time supporter of big oil and through his Energy VISION act hopes to implement positive strategies for fossil fuels into domestic production in Washington.

Just this June, Roskam voted against two bills, H.R. 6346 and H.R. 6251 to keep Big Oil from price gouging and force them to drill on land they already own. After seeing Exxon-Mobil and Shell enjoy record profits last quarter thanks to speculators and Washington supporters like Roskam, Morgenthaler has decided enough is enough.

"Big Oil is giving Roskam money and he is returning the favor. It's high time that our Representative stopped looking out for Big Oil and started working in the best interest of the people of Illinois." -jillmorgenthaler.com

Special interests in Big Oil seem to be running rampant through Congress in disguise as "patriotism". Is it indeed patriotic to force drills into American soil to drain us hastily, or is it a ploy for padding Congressional pockets?

Supporting Evidence: Enough of "Rubber Stamp Roskam" (rubberstamproskam.com)
Side: Jill Morgenthaler
1 point

"Roskam talks about supporting the troops and veterans, but he consistently votes against bills to support the troops."

As a colonel herself, Morgenthaler considers it a duty and a privilege to be "a voice for the military" as she puts it, in Congress. Roskam's economically based votes in the House do not provide the military with the funding it requires to obtain equipment or provide veteran medical services. On the recent amendment to the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, Roskam voted no to providing federal funding to veterans and their families.

Morgenthaler gives Roskam a hard time for withholding troop funding
Side: Jill Morgenthaler
1 point

The U.S. environmental policy, Morgenthaler believes, needs to be amended to better support green energy at home and abroad. Global warming is a reality, she says, and must be considered with every decision Congress makes concerning America's relationship with Big Oil.

Morgenthaler: The current administration’s blind support of oil companies not only hurts consumers, who are paying record high prices at the gas pump, but pollutes our atmosphere while ignoring global warning which threatens our world today.

If elected, Morgenthaler pledges to work towards green energy solutions and more environmentally friendly methods of business, but to work to protect the environmental health and well-being of American citizens both at the domestic and economic level.

Side: Jill Morgenthaler
1 point

The recent flooding in Illinois has left many without homes and destroyed property. Four people died due to the flooding earlier this month. Morgenthaler was not left untouched by the floods. In fact, as her house was being flooded, Morgenthaler gave a press release chastising Roskam and other Illinois politicians for not giving 6th district residents a comprehensive evacuation plan or community shelter.

Roskam: ""As I was standing in my living room with flood waters rising, it would have been great to get some direction from the responders. Did they want us to evacuate, did they want us to stay put, go to a community shelter or what? It would be very helpful for responders to be able to communicate to citizens emergency instructions through automated text and telephone calls during disasters like these floods, tornados or other emergencies."

Morgenthaler in floods asks where is Roskam?
Side: Jill Morgenthaler
1 point

The Illinois Republican party may soon come out swinging against Morgenthaler's campaign by using evidence like this to associate her with Governor Blagojevich, who has low approval ratings and endorses Senator Obama. Morgenthaler may also have trouble taking Roskam to task for the war in Iraq when he himself is one of its injured veterans. Voters may do themselves a great service by finding at least one candidate for this district who has no record of participation in the war but wants it ended.

Side:
Peter Roskam (R)
1 point

Roskam is well-known for fiscal conservativeness. He was recently named a "taxpayer hero" by The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) for key economic votes in Congress to stop wasteful government spending. CCAGW president, Tom Shatz dubbed him the most fiscally responsible member of the Illionois delegation, rated at 81% economic conservation.

“CCAGW’s 2007 Congressional Ratings reflect some positive trends. For example, in the House in 2007, an average of 89 members voted for earmark-related amendments, compared to an average of 68 in 2006. However, in spite of a growing recognition that earmarks are a problem, Congress still spends more than is necessary," said Shatz.

Roskam recently voted against Bush's blank check that would increase taxes by $800 million and give Governor Blagojevich tax incentives to buy up foreclosed homes.

Roskam: “I am thoroughly disappointed that the Bush Administration and Democrat Majority in Congress have decided to ram through legislation that puts hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars at risk with absolutely no spending oversight. Expanding the government’s reach, without checks-and-balances, is an affront to what our founding fathers set forth more than 200 years ago. "

Supporting Evidence: Original article in the Illinois Review (illinoisreview.typepad.com)
Side: Peter Roskam
1 point

After the passing of the bipartisan energy bill, HR 6899, many conservative politicians, including Roskam, threw up their hands in frustration at the prohibition on leasing of land for domestic drilling.

Roskam's energy proposal, entitled the VISION act calls for an increase in domestic oil production through shale rock oil, ANWR and drilling off of the Gulf coast in an effort to stave off increasing gas prices. It also looks into heavily exploring nuclear energy and clean coal.

Roskam: I am disappointed the House has descended to this partisan political ploy. Quite frankly, I don’t know how a bill could be considered pro-domestic production when the first section of the bill is entitled ‘Prohibition on leasing.’ We need an all-of-the-above energy policy, like my Energy VISION Act, that increases domestic production of traditional resources, advances alternative renewable energy, and enhances conservation.

However, the bill was constructed in response to public outcry from the states in which domestic drilling was an absolute possibility, so could one say that Roskam's view motivated by self-interest?

Supporting Evidence: Roskam disappointed with passed energy bill (roskam.house.gov)
Side: Peter Roskam
1 point

Roskam Votes No to Bailout

Roskam explained that the bill did not do enough to ensure taxpayers that they would get their money back, to limit executive compensation, or to allow private capital to share in the burden. He stated,

“While action is necessary to keep our economy on track, the heavy-handed push from the Bush Administration and this Democrat majority places too great a burden on taxpayers with no guarantee of success. The plan voted on in the House incorporated watered down aspects of executive compensation limits and provided for insufficient use of private capital."

“Unfortunately, negotiations were unable to produce a solution to keep our economy on track without exposing taxpayers to extraordinary risk – this is why the bill failed."

He has yet to offer or support an alternative plan.

Supporting Evidence: No Bailout (roskam.house.gov)
Side: Bailout
1 point

When it comes to a change in transportation methods in Illinois, Roskam and Morgenthaler both agree that a railway merger will play some point in easing congestion for Illinois commuters, but Roskam does not favor property buy-ups in order to expand O'Hare.

If the airport, which is the second busiest airport in the US according to a poll taken by the FAA last year, is to be expanded in order to accommodate all of the extra traffic, then, says Roskam, the face of Basenville will completely change. The expansion may jeopardize local businesses.

At such an uncertain moment for our nation's economy, is it prudent of Morgenthaler to want to further foreclosure risks for homeowners and small businesses?

Supporting Evidence: Roskam and Morgenthaler argue about O'Hare (www.roskamforcongress.com)
Side: Peter Roskam