CreateDebate


Debate Info

20
31

Bob Tuke (D)


Lamar Alexander (R)

Debate Score:51
Arguments:18
Total Votes:58
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 
Bob Tuke (D)
(8)
 
 
Lamar Alexander (R)
(10)

Debate Creator

CreateDebate(732) pic



Who should I vote for in the 2008 Tennesee Senate Race?


Bob Tuke (D)

Side Score: 20
VS.


Lamar Alexander (R)

Side Score: 31
5 points

Bob Tuke (D) is weighing his military credentials and religious convictions real heavy on his platform for Tennessee Senator against Lamar Alexander (R).

To show his support for our troops and their efforts overseas, he implemented Operation Bob's Boxes to gather up packages of food, toiletries, books, and other items to ship over to Tennessee troops serving our country.

However, as the project was in process, Hurricane Gustav loomed over the Gulf Coast and Tuke sent a portion of the packages to the relief effort.

"This is what Democrats do when people are in need. We 'pray with our feet.'"

In his most recent post on his campaign website, he attacks Alexander for voting against the Predisaster Mitigation Grant Program at FEMA, which would have helped in providing services to potential disaster victims beforehand rather than after the catastrophe.

He closes his post with "When I am your Senator, you can count on me to vote with Matthew 25 in mind: to care for the most needy among us. It is after all what we are called to do as stewards of our people and our planet. Together, Let's Take the Hill.

Semper Fidelis, Bob Tuke"

I suppose to some extent, Tuke has a right to lay heavy on the military/religious angle to appeal to the Republican majority in the state of Tennessee. Yet, if he keeps backing it up with pragmatic projects and runs a steady stream of campaign ads in the next couple months, it may pan out to be a close race afterall.

Supporting Evidence: Bob Tuke (www.tukefortennessee.com)
Side: Bob Tuke
4 points

According to ontheissues.org, "drug lords in Afghanistan are making record profits in heroin trafficking and are even outsourcing their work to increase the amount of heroin they can process." The Afghan heroine market provides up to 90% of the world's supply and the money is being used to fund terrorist efforts inside and outside of the country, according to the report.

Bob Tuke (D) has promised to commit himself to combat the heroin sale and production in Afghanistan as an effective measure to decrease funding behind organizations such as Al Qaeda. He is also calling for a responsible withdrawal of our troops from Iraq to recommit our military forces and spending towards fighting the war on terror where the problem has been and is still building its forces.

Supporting Evidence: International Drug Markets and Terrorists (www.ontheissues.org)
Side: International Drug Markets Terrorists
3 points

Bob Tuke (D) has released a public statement denouncing the near $700 billion bailout of the federal financial markets proposed by the Bush Administration.

He states, "To be sure, the financial markets need stability, and it is clear that our government will be required to help. But with that help must come reliable assurances of responsible financial behavior in the future and accountability for how this disaster happened in the first place."

He continues, "We should slow down and require any plan to deal with the weakened financial situation of banks to include the following: strict accountability to insure that institutions benefiting from government assistance are held accountable for their debts; assurance that other nations are paying their fair share for the rescue of their own banks; and requirements that taxpayer money be used to stabilize consumer banking functions and not for executive compensation."

He then goes on to criticize his opponent, Lamar Alexander (R), for his failure to speak up on behalf of the issues that are hurting Tennessee voters such as high gas prices and a declining job market. He attacks Alexander for the Republican's ties to the Bush Administration, wealthy banking professionals, and oil executives, which (he suggests) may account for the senior senator's silence on the financial crisis.

In sum, Tuke's message rings very simply: "The Bush administration's proposal that U.S. taxpayers blindly cough up a minimum of $700 billion of welfare for Wall Street is wrong."

Supporting Evidence: Tuke against the Bailout (www.chattanoogan.com)
Side: Tuke against the bailout
2 points

William "Mike" Padgett is focused on balancing the national budget and is promising Tennessee voters that as Senator he will "see that your hard-earned money won't be spent on the priorities of the few but on your priorities."

A harsh critic of the tax cuts of the Bush administration, Padgett argues that the tax cuts belong to the middle-class workers. He is calling for a more consistent and productive use of tax money in contrast to the amount of money the U.S. is currently spending in Iraq and the tax cuts for special interests. A more fair and comprehensive taxation and a smarter budgeting of our finances, Padgett argues, is paramount to the future economic health of our country.

As Senator, Mike Padgett promises "not vote to raise the federal debt limit and will work to restore pay-as-you go financing."

Supporting Evidence: Federal Budget (www.votepadgett.com)
Side: Federal Budget
tjthompson(9) Disputed
2 points

Maybe I'm missing it, but what does a Mike Padgett have to do with this race?

Side: Lamar Alexander
3 points

AH!...thanks for the heads up on that one, tjthompson.

When I originally posted that piece Mike Padgett was still in the running (or at least his name was the only up yet on the Democratic side of this debate.)

Nonetheless, as of the beginning of August, Mike Padgett has little to do with this race as he conceded his campaign for Senator of Tennessee to Bob Tuke (D) in hopes that the military experience and wave of Republican disenfranchisement might wash over the state and vote Lamar Alexander out of Washington.

Again, thank for keeping me up to date...Cheers!

Supporting Evidence: Thanks (politics.nashvillepost.com)
Side: Thanks for the Note
2 points

Bob Tuke (D) received a valuable endorsement from Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen on September 7th.

The Governor supported his endorsement primarily by highlighting the Democratic candidate's "capability to address the critical problems confronting Tennesseans today: bringing down high fuel prices, creating more jobs, jump-starting our slowing economy and better managing our war on terror."

Bredesen goes on to highlight Tuke's military career in Vietnam (a major talking point for Tuke's campaign) and also to point out Tuke's active support for Barack Obama. He also counts himself alongside Al Gore and other prominent political figures who are backing Tuke in the Tennessee Senate race.

Overall, the endorsement letter lacks any "red meat" (or whatever it is that the pundits are calling partisan jabs these days) and it merely reiterates the usual jargon about improving the economy, solving the energy crisis, and fighting the war on terror that seems to incessantly ring from every political microphone and letter across the country.

Nonetheless, endorsements can go a long way in garnering votes and it doesn't necessarily hurt for Tuke to accept fairly well-respected governor's approval.

Supporting Evidence: Bredesen's Endorsement (tndp.org)
Side: Bredesen's endorsement
1 point

Former Vice President Al Gore will be hosting a fundraiser for Bob Tuke (D) on October 10th at his home in the Belle Meade neighborhood at $1,000 per person. According to the report in the Knox News website, "A special reception before will be held for those who give $2,300 and groups can be named host committees by giving at least $5,000."

Tuke is facing a sizable financial disadvantage to Lamar Alexander (R) and a fundraiser of this caliber occurring just five days prior to the first day of early voting (October 15th) has to put a strong wind in his sails heading into the final stretch to November.

Supporting Evidence: Gore Fundraiser (www.knoxnews.com)
Side: Gore Fundraiser

Former Marine Bob Tuke is a moderate liberal populist who has been endorsed by Tennessee's favorite son Al Gore and Gen. Wesley Clark, and deserves to be the next senator from the 16th state. He is for health care reform along, energy independence, and endorses A Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq. His opponent, Lamar Alexander, is an old time Washington insider who blindly supported Bush in virtually every major decision the current administration made. Some accuse him of being a scandal ridden phony- as you can see here:http://www.realchange.org/alexandr.htm. The choice is clear, an Tuke is the one.

Supporting Evidence: Responsible Plan for Iraq (www.responsibleplan.com)
Side: Bob Tuke
1 point

Republican Senator Lamar Alexander is just now releasing his ad campaign to "reintroduce himself to Tennessee voters" according to an Associated Press report in the College Publisher Network.

The ad refers to Alexander's former years as the "young, enthusiastic, piano-playing governor" and how, as Senator, Lamar Alexander "doesn't really care if you're a Republican or a Democrat...He looks you in the eye, listens more than he talks, just tries to do something good each day."

No debates have yet to be scheduled and the ad itself (in my opinion, at first glance) fails to respect or even acknowledge the real issue that is taking the top priority in Tennessee and national concerns: the economy.

I think it's a bit late to be "introducing" yourself to voters and perhaps the Bob Tuke, Alexander's Democratic rival, will benefit from the Senator's failure to publicly (in this ad at least) address the economic crisis.

Supporting Evidence: Launching Ads (media.www.utmpacer.com)
Side: Launching Ads
5 points

Tuke seriously lacks credibility for being Obama's campaign chair in Tennessee when Obama couldn't win the state's primary on Super Tuesday. Alexander is currently neutral in the presidential race, although he had previously endorsed Fred Thompson who was able to defeat current Obama supporter and congressman Jim Cooper for the Senate. While Alexander basically supports Bush's agenda, he and other Republicans like him would do well to listen to voters by following up on any promises they make to reverse current policies.

Side:
Lamar Alexander (R)
4 points

“We’ve been hearing a lot of talk about change this year, but a real change would mean lower taxes, less wasteful spending, and more attention on the family budget. I’m disappointed the Democratic leadership proposed a budget that is bad for Tennesseans and for millions of Americans who are looking for relief.”

Presiding Tennessee Senator Lamar Alexander recently voted down legislation which would have raised the average American household's taxes by $2300. Alexander argues that the budget resolution for 2009 considered by the Senate would initiate a $1.2 trillion tax hike, $210 billion spending increase, and a $2 trillion increase to the national debt by 2013.

The bill was passed in the Senate by a vote of 48 to 45, but Alexander's primary concern was that the tax policy failed to address the budgeting issues facing the average American family. Real change, he says, is lower our taxes and effective spending that allows hardworking people to set up savings accounts, to give them the freedom to invest, and to provide room for entrepreneurial ventures which will invigorate the national economy.

Supporting Evidence: Alexander and Taxes (alexander.senate.gov)
Side: Alexander and Taxes
3 points

Democrats tend to put too much weight on the endorsements of former vice president Al Gore. He has endorsed Tuke's run, which may be a little helpful after the congressional terms he won in his own right but that will probably be the best he can offer to his party. Promoting messages that resonate with voters doesn't work if you can't translate it into victory.

Side:
Lamar Alexander (R)
2 points

Besides the issues, Mr. Lamar Alexander is very detailed in his positions on his website: alexander.senate.gov. He states his stances on the issues with the votes he has taken and reasons why. Not to mention he posts speeches he has given on the Senate floor.

On the Amendment S.Amdt. 5059 to H.R. 6304 (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978) “To limit retroactive immunity for providing assistance to the United States to instances in which a Federal court determines the assistance was provided in connection with an intelligence activity that was constitutional.”

Mr. Alexander’s vote was ‘nay,’ which is hard to describe because the specific 6304 discusses that it should limit the immunity and not provide indefinite immunity. On the Senator’s website it does establish that he voted on three separate bills for the FISA Amendments.

In the end, according to Senate.gov, Mr. Alexander had voted for the FISA Bill Amendments Act of 2008, which provides clear immunity to telecommunications companies and allows the United States Government to tap U.S. citizens’ phone calls even overseas now.

Side: Lamar Alexander
2 points

I agree with your argument. I honestly can not think of another politician who has been so active in Tennessee polirtics than Lamar Alexander. I believe he has proven himself to be an ethical politician who stands up for the people of Tennessee. I'm voting for Lamar!

Side: Lamar Alexander
2 points

Lamar Alexander has been both a two-term governor and United States senator for the state of Tennessee. He has also served as United States Secretary of Education, the president of the University of Tennessee, and a professor at the Harvard School of Government.

When running for governor, he walked 1,000 miles across Tennessee, gaining support along the way. His impressive devotion is evident in other causes, as well, especially education. As governor of Tennessee, Alexander pushed for better teachers to get paid more. Tennessee was the first state to establish such a policy.

He supports a literal interpretation of the Constitution rather than a subjective analysis of its merits. He opposes parole for armed robbers, was given an "A" rating from the National Rifle Association, and received a 0% rating from the AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor union. He is a supporter of higher defense spending as well as the line-item veto, which would allow a president to veto individual pork barrel projects but pass an otherwise good bill.

Side: Lamar Alexander
2 points

Until I pulled up this debate, I had never heard of Bob Tuke. Lamar Alexander, on the other hand, has been a Tennessee mainstay my entire life. Keep Lamar Alexander in the Senate and keep him working for us. We do not need another unproven candidate simply in a knee-jerk reaction and desire for "change."

Side: Lamar Alexander
1 point

Alexander Votes for Bailout

Immediately highlighting that the bailout legislation would give 600,000 Tennesseans an average of $400 in tax relief, Alexander said yes to the bailout. He argued that bill would stimulate economic activity by unclogging credit from a tight market,

“This should get economic traffic moving again and restore confidence so that Americans can get auto, student, mortgage, business, and farm credit loans at reasonable prices."

Addressing taxpayer concerns Alexander believes that any longterm cost would be "limited" and that there might be a profit in the end. He continued,

"Since the Secretary will be buying troubled mortgage assets and then selling them, the cost to taxpayers should be limited, and any profits will go to reduce the federal debt.”

Supporting Evidence: Yes to Bailout (alexander.senate.gov)
Side: Bailout