CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:12
Arguments:14
Total Votes:13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Who should be allowed to vote? (11)

Debate Creator

JustIgnoreMe(4290) pic



Who should be allowed to vote?

Those in jail awaiting trial? sentencing?

Those currently in jail, but who will get out before the next election?

Those in jail for life?

Those who were convicted of felonies, but have served their time?

Those that a court says are mentally deficient?

What age restrictions are appropriate?

Add New Argument

Prisoners do not deserve the vote. Going to prison means losing your freedom including the freedom to vote. I as a 16 year old can say that the idea of the vote being lowered to 16 is absolutely ridiculous. Most my age would not know who to vote for and even if they did would not make the right to decision.

Why should we prevent any prisoners from voting?

Isn't there a potential for a government to abuse this power by imprisoning a person? (e.g. a very small town that is pretty evenly divided - just arrest one or two people and you might swing an election.)

Prisoners that have income (maybe they have book royalties or investment income, etc. that they still receive while in jail) are required to pay taxes - so do they have taxation without representation?

JustIgnoreMe(4290) Clarified
1 point

If they were residents of one state, but are in prison in another state, which ballot should they use?

Me. No one else. Do you have any idea how great the world would be if I were the only one who could vote?

Definitely the first two should be allowed to cast their votes,trials can save the convicts and after that they've rights to vote

1 point

Well yes they may be prisoners but they are still human and have rights

1 point

Anyone who is a US citizen should be allowed to vote. Some would say only home owners or only tax payers. I say every US citizen.

1 point

Once convicted of their crime, prisoners should not be able to vote, even after released from prison.

flewk(1193) Clarified
1 point

You did not specify what type of crime so your statement would include misdemeanors. Perhaps you meant felonies?

Even then, there are plenty of non-violent felonies. Would you limit it to only violent felons?

flewk(1193) Clarified
1 point

You did not specify what type of crime so your statement would include misdemeanors. Perhaps you meant felonies?

Even then, there are plenty of non-violent felonies. Would you limit it to only violent felons?

0 points

What if they are exonerated?

Astac(242) Disputed
1 point

Maybe English is not your first language. Once they have been Convicted?? do you understand that. Now if they have been Exonerated, they are no longer Convicted. Stop being an A$$hole

In my opinion, anyone who is standing in a line should be able to vote.