CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:118
Arguments:102
Total Votes:123
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Who would make the best president? (94)

Debate Creator

NathanAllen(2227) pic



Who would make the best president?

Who in the entire world would make the best president...
Add New Argument
4 points

I think I would. People like me and I am a good debater. Hope this helps :)

2 points

I think Boehner would be good. He has tons of experience dealing with the clowns in Congress.

shaash(435) Clarified
1 point

I thought you were a liberal ?

1 point

Nope. I am anti crazy and the Republicans have gone off the deep end.

2 points

Neil deGrasse Tyson.

The best President in the world would have to be a true Christian because Christians have love for ALL people. They have a wisdom that supercedes the world's self love if it feels good do it mentality. They understand debt and the consequences of irresponsibility. I believe it would be one of the most non scandalous presidencies.

But they are not blind and understand we have evil in this world that must be dealt with.

The Obama's and those on the Left act like bleeding heart fools who thinks if you just be nice to evil, it will change it's spots. Evil as relating to the terrorist mentality in so much of the Muslim world laughs at our apologies and attempts at normallizing relationships. THEY WANT TO KILL US FOR SIMPLY NOT BEING ISLAMIC.

Putin laughs at our weakness. Evil does not respect weakness!

Terrorists use excuses for their butchery such as American's on their homeland, and then when the troops leave, they could care less..... they simply keep killing. They have but one agenda and it is to kill anyone who does not agree with their religion. We are the infidels to them and the Obama administration is caving in to Iranian terrorists.

Hillary would be four more years of transforming America into yet one more bankrupt socialist European nation.

We will never see a true Christian president because the electorate has been conditioned by the Left to hate Christians.

Atrag(5445) Disputed
3 points

The best President in the world would have to be a true Christian because Christians have love for ALL people.

You arent a Christian then. Sorry it just really is as simple as that if that is what a Christian must be.

Hillary would be four more years of transforming America into yet one more bankrupt socialist European nation.

You clearly know nothing about the Europe. Have you taken a look at your national debt recently?

FromWithin(7131) Disputed
1 point

Yes, I constnatly speak to America's enormous debt created by big spending liberal politicians. They are transforming our once great nation into a socialist bankrupt nation.

People like you would never understand what love is all about. It is certainly not supporting abortions for any reasons at any stage as does the Democrat party. I'm sure the Liberals in your nation support the same thing as they piously call themselves the compassionate ones.

Akulakhan(2973) Clarified
2 points

You never answered the question.

1 point

I wish he would respond to you with someone that fits his description. Too bad he can't do it since he described Jesus.

Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

We will never see a true Christian president because the electorate has been conditioned by the Left to hate Christians.

No, it's because you described Jesus.

1 point

True it's already established that Christians have a king who is Christian known as Jesus Christ. According to the bible, which is Christian law, each president is immediately subject to him.

1 point

The best President in the world would have to be a true Christian because Christians have love for ALL people.

So, Christian love is meaningless? Because you don't have to do anything to earn it?

Evil as relating to the terrorist mentality in so much of the Muslim world laughs at our apologies and attempts at normallizing relationships. THEY WANT TO KILL US FOR SIMPLY NOT BEING ISLAMIC.

ISIS kills far more Muslims than any other group.

Putin laughs at our weakness. Evil does not respect weakness!

Do you have any reason to believe that America is seen as week across the world, other than the word of the media and politicians?

FromWithin(7131) Disputed
1 point

I follow politics so therefore I know what Russia thinks and what they have done because of Obama's weakness. You obviously are in the dark. The Iranians knew how weak Obama was and how desparately he wanted a legacy no matter how terrible a deal it was.

Brush up on what's happening around the world.

1 point

the human who would most likely fix it financially, and keep it socially exactly as it is. that's who I'd elect.

1 point

Albus Dumbledore

1 point

A Donald Trump / Monica Lewinsky ticket would throw Hillary off her game.

1 point

How about Trump/Broadrrick or Trump/West? That might be even better.

Albus Dumbledore.......................................................................

I think Boehner would be good. He has tons of experience dealing with the clowns in Congress.

1 point

The best President in the world would have to be a true Christian because Christians have love for ALL people.

1 point

I thought you were a liberal ?...........................................................

Someone who 'tells it as it is' and can see the back of their beloved Country being broken in two under the intolerable strain of ''UNCONTROLLED'' immigration and ''welfareism''. The president must have the confidence and moral fibre to voice these negative features which were permitted to, and indeed encouraged to, grow as well the political courage to tackle these problems head on. That person is Donald Trump, the political heavyweight champion of his time and he must be given the opportunity to give the United States back to the people.

1 point

Clint Eastwood.

1 point

I don't know. But I do know who it will NOT be..................an atheist.

Cuz you have no moral foundation. And you admit it. Thats the key. You admit it.

I know that anyone from any religion can also lie. And many religious are hypocrites.

I get that.

But the problem is that you are constantly admitting that you have no morals. You do it every time that you claim that morality is relative, and that good and evil are subjective. But of course, you don't realize that you are saying an atrocity. Morality is Absolute, or it does not exist.

No such thing as relative morality or subjective good or bad. Relative morality is a contradiction.

So if I had to decide between a religious fanatic and you, I will have to vote for the religious fanatic,

Because at least his world view contains objective morality, even if he's immoral.

So I couldn't know.

But with you I do know, because you already told me. Lol.

So once again, you contradict yourself

JustIgnoreMe(3450) Clarified
1 point

you have no moral foundation. And you admit it.

Isn't that better than not having a moral foundation, but believing you do?

Delvis(221) Clarified
1 point

No. Morality is absolute and objective, or it doesn't exist.

So if your world view contains this, you can be immoral, but you can also be objectively moral. Because you have a foundation or reference that is independent from you. But if you do not believe in an independent foundation, then tell me, if I decided to eat babies, why should you have a problem with that ? ""Social consensus"". ?

So if I move somewhere where everyone likes to eat babies,

then you will be okay with it, right ? You see the mess that creates ?

Akulakhan(2973) Disputed
1 point

I don't know. But I do know who it will NOT be..................an atheist.

100% agree here. Don't get used to it.

-

[Because]you have no moral foundation.

This is a new one. Never heard that claimed by anyone. in regards to morality, atheists typically fall in one of two camps. They consider morals subjective or objective. Neither camp makes the claim that morals have no foundation, but rather each is a stance on what that foundation is.

-

And you admit it. That[^']s the key. You admit it.

What makes you think anyone feels the need to confess their opinion on morality? It's not like coming out of the closet or being on trial.

-

I know that anyone from any religion can also lie. And many religious are hypocrites.

I get that.

So I guess they should reconsider where they get their 'moral foundation' from, eh?

-

But the problem is that you are constantly admitting that you have no morals. You do it every time that you claim that morality is relative, and that good and evil are subjective.

Relativity and subjectivity are very different topics, I suggest taking the time to look these terms up and educate yourself before you misuse them as interchangeable any more than you already have. Subjective morals can be argued to be absolute, and objective morals can be argued to be relative. The latter of which you might want to look up, because it's used in a very common apologetic argument about the perceived change in God's morality between the old and new testaments; you might find it useful.

-

No such thing as relative morality or subjective good or bad. Relative morality is a contradiction.

Relative morality: the stance that morals are dependent on their relationship to a circumstance. For example; stealing is bad, typically, but it can be argued that stealing otherwise wasted food to feed the starving is good.

Subjective morality: the stance that moral acts can be good or bad depending on subjective experience.

To use the previous example, the starving people probably saw the act of stealing to be a good act, as where the owner of the food would see it as bad.

-

So if I had to decide between a religious fanatic and you, I will have to vote for the religious fanatic,

Because at least his world view contains objective morality, even if he's immoral.

So far you've made no moral distinction between atheism and theism that wasn't due to lack of proper definition. However, you have made the distinction that you would vote for someone who you believe to be immoral on the basis of their having a religious belief. Hopefully you can see how this will definitely negatively affect you.

nobodyknows(745) Disputed
1 point

I wish I had as much faith in authority as you have.

To think that a system of morals becomes objective because it is one step removed from the subjective belief in a deity that decrees it is hardly a sound argument. Where is your objective argument for the existence of your diety or deities? Where is your objective proof that your gods want you to follow this rather than that moral law? Your moral seem to be no less subjective than any atheist's, you just add more irrational leaps.

Honestly, have you thought this through at all? I can give you a reading list if you like but nothing substitutes for actual critical thinking.

-1 points

Surely not the Lyin Hillary ! Bitch couldn't tell the truth if a gun was held to her head !