CreateDebate


Debate Info

20
20
Gross No more man boobs pls
Debate Score:40
Arguments:42
Total Votes:46
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Gross (15)
 
 No more man boobs pls (9)

Debate Creator

MichioKaku(161) pic



Why can't women walk around topless if fat disgusting men can?

Gross

Side Score: 20
VS.

No more man boobs pls

Side Score: 20
4 points

Depending on your gender, you are either a pervert wanting to ogle at women's breasts or a showboating exhibitionist with an underlying desire to be a stripper.

Which ever it is, you sound a most undesirable character.

Do the police have you on their files?

Side: Gross
3 points

The current fantasy we have created for ourselves is that boobs make everything look great. If women were allowed to go topless, that fantasy would come tumbling down. I mean, it's OK if you have a great pair but the majority don't.

Also, that fantasy empowers women. They expose as much (top, side, bottom) boob/cleavage as they think they need to manipulate men. It's kinda like "Pay-Per-View." They give you the trailer in hopes that you buy the package.

Some women don't want to take a chance by giving you a trailer. Which is why some women wear a burka. They are hoping you buy what they are peddling sight unseen. ;)

Side: Gross
marcusmoon(582) Clarified
1 point

Some women don't want to take a chance by giving you a trailer. Which is why some women wear a burka. They are hoping you buy what they are peddling sight unseen. ;)

That is not why they wear a burka, but your point is well taken.

There is a country song, "I Don't Look Good Naked, Anymore" which makes some of your point, but from the other side.

Side: Gross
1 point

The religion thing is just an excuse to justify the enforcement ;)

Side: Gross
1 point

It's unclear which side stands for what in the voting buttons.

In my personal opinion the objection to topless nudity based on gender is simply archaic...

a) As already pointed out, it's a double standard between men and women

b) It often is the basis for objecting to breast feeding, which arguably should be a basic human right between mother and child

c) Society allows people to wear clothes so ridiculously skimpy that nudity isn't really that big a difference. String bikinis which cover just nipples are basically being topless. Wearing a see through bra or blouse, again, is basically being topless. Body paint is somehow considered clothes even though it's just an illusion.

d) The problem isn't actually the nudity itself, it's men believing they can act out terribly and do whatever they want if a temptation visually presents itself. Hey, women used to be not allowed to show ankles, for fear they'd get attacked. Now they can walk around half naked and for the most part they aren't attacked. We need to take that next step of having self control even if a boob is exposed. If a man molests a woman because she is topless then throw the book at him.

Side: Gross
outlaw60(15336) Disputed
1 point

Unbelievable how really stupid you Progressives are !

"d) The problem isn't actually the nudity itself, it's men believing they can act out terribly and do whatever they want if a temptation visually presents itself."

Wait a minute here Progressive i thought it was your viewpoint that the transgendered confused could enter the woman's restroom ?

Boston Boy i say again how really confused you people are !

Let's take it one step further out of the mouth of the confused !

"If a man molests a woman because she is topless then throw the book at him."

Really dummy were you concerned about that when Obama wanted transgendered bathrooms ? Again your ignorance is glaringly transparent but your not bright enough to figure it out !

Side: No more man boobs pls
Grenache(6103) Disputed
1 point

If a transgender molests a woman then throw the book at him. This stuff isn’t hard.

Side: Gross
1 point

I am going to frankly state it: women have genitals on their chest, men don't.

Side: Gross
1 point

You can here in Austin, Texas.

Believe me though, it will become apparent why it is better for women to cover themselves. It will not be possible to avoid unwanted attention. I've known women to try going around topless all the time, and they usually learn something.

Side: Gross
-2 points
outlaw60(15336) Disputed
5 points

Crazy Al you mean you are in opposition to fat transgendered men in the woman's dressing room ? Going against the Progressive Narrative there Al ?

Side: No more man boobs pls
3 points

I think that laws against toplessness are ridiculous.

While I think requirements for clothes over the ass and genitals are supported by the need for cleanliness in public spaces, restaurant chairs, subway seats, etc., I see no need for people to wear shirts in public.

The moral arguments for them are predicated primarily on the assumption that nudity is sexual, when most of human nudity is for bathing and changing clothes.

The aesthetic arguments for them are based primarily of the assumption that there is some universally acceptable body type, or preference. There is no reason looking at people's noses is better than seeing their nipples, but we seem to have adjusted.

Everybody should get over it.

Side: No more man boobs pls
4 points

@marcusmoon

Agreed

Women should be able to 'walk around topless' as the requirements on clothing as such universally are generally based on arbitrary norms. This becomes quite obvious when one considers dressing a certain way to the beach is not only socially acceptable, but expected--while dressing that same way to Class would get one removed from the situation/school.

It is all very silly/childish really, in my view

Side: No more man boobs pls
0 points

@MarcusMoon/Mathfan

I agree, especially when fat ass walrus men walk around shirtless with their jiggling man boobs. If anything they should be covering up, not women just because they have developed mammary glands.

Side: No more man boobs pls
FromWithin(7586) Disputed
1 point

If you don't think nudity is sexual.........WOW!..................................

Side: Gross
MichioKaku(161) Disputed
2 points

@FromWithin

If nudity is inherently sexual then why don't you fuck animals?

Side: No more man boobs pls
marcusmoon(582) Clarified
2 points

If you don't think nudity is sexual.........WOW!

Is it sexual when you lather up in the shower?

No.

Is it sexual when you change your underwear or your shirt?

No.

Is it sexual when you are taking a crap?

No.

Is it sexual when a baby is having his diaper changed?

No!

Is it sexual when a mother breastfeeds her baby?

No!

Is it sexual when a naked four-year-old is running through the sprinklers?

No!

Is it sexual when on a sweltering summer day I sit my fat, sweaty ass on the couch naked so the fan can blow on ALL of me while I eat a popsicle and watch the news?

Oh HELL no!

Sex is sexual. Talking about sex is sometimes sexual.

Nudity is just something we mostly don't, but sometimes think of as sexual for no other reason than sometimes people are naked when they are having sex.

If you think the sexual part of sex is the nudity.........WOW!

Side: Gross
WinstonC(1226) Clarified
1 point

"While I think requirements for clothes over the ass and genitals are supported by the need for cleanliness in public spaces, restaurant chairs, subway seats, etc., I see no need for people to wear shirts in public."

Would you be OK with people wearing completely transparent underwear that puts their genitals on full display?

Side: Gross

They can in Oregon. People can go completely nude in Oregon, but they very rarely do, except during the annual nude bike ride through the city.

Side: No more man boobs pls
xMathFanx(1737) Clarified
1 point

@LittleMisfit

Interesting--I was not aware of that .

Side: Gross