I don't necessarily agree that mac is far superior to Windows or any other product, nor will it ever take over a market dominated by Windows. Personally I like Mac OS X and it is the only OS I choose to use. But I am not a PC gamer, if I were, I would definitely be using Windows. I do think that Mac OS X will gain more and more market share and become even more compatible with other operating systems. Eventually Linux will take over though... probably. Posted 117 days ago
|
I don't know much about it, but I'd guess a lot of Apple's income comes from the fact they _aren't_ compatible with other OSes and you can't get plug-and-play stuff for Macs that Apple doesn't make, right? So that's a pretty strong incentive for them to keep a monopoly on the Mac-using market and not make compromises with who can make peripherals for their computers. The iPod and its million bastard children and the iPhone are making money for them, but I don't think that's a reason for people to buy a computer off Apple, and I don't think the mp3-playing market they've gained is giving them any reason to make their computers play nicely with Windows or Linux. So I don't really see where your argument's going. Posted 117 days ago
|
There is plenty of plug and play hardware available for Mac that is not made by Apple. Most hardware can be plugged in and not have to worry about drivers like Windows. Don't forget about Boot Camp, which allows Windows XP to run on a Mac, essentially making it a Windows PC. Posted 117 days ago
|
If Mac is so high and mighty, why would you want to even consider running Windows on a Mac? Just because it can? Windows is not Open Source, it is Windows that allows it's product to have the ability to run on another platform. If OSX is so great, why not let it run on a PC? Answer: Marketing for their branded hardware. Just like the windows formatted iPod having the compatibility for use of both the PC and Mac, where as a Apple formatted iPod only works on a Mac. Apple is the one that should produce compatibilty for their products. Posted 117 days ago
|
Hmkay. I'll take your word for it :) So you can buy a Mac computer with a Mac operating system and then buy a way to change it into Windows, and then pay for Windows installation disks? LOL. And given Vista costs upwards of £100... Posted 117 days ago
|
Boot Camp is free in the sense that it comes included with Mac OS X. Why would you buy Vista anyway? Posted 117 days ago
|
I wouldn't; I'm a Linux user. But I like Apple more for knowing they give you this Boot Camp, even though buying a Mac and putting Windows on it defeats the point. Still, this is kind of off-topic. Sorry! Posted 117 days ago
|
It doesn't defeat the purpose. You buy a mac to have a dependable and well made machine. Even if OS X isn't your OS, you can be comfortable with the machine itself. It's not like you can't mess around with OS X if you wanted to. Unfortunately, if you have a PC, you cannot do that (legally, and easily). Posted 114 days ago
|
Plug and Play is better for Mac, actually. The point at where you lose your advantage with the mac is in software development and support. For instance, if you have an odd mp3 player with all sorts of customizable features and only has Windows software, and you cannot find someones homebuilt application to work on the mac, the mac will treat it as a removable disk. You can still find your way through the file system on the mp3 player and move/copy/paste/delete things from the directory, but you will not be able to interact with the mp3's internal memory, to change certain things. Like, I have a blackberry pearl 8100, and I cannot use it w/ my mac like I can with a windows machine because of the lack of support for OS X. It's not the OS's fault, it's not the hardware's fault, it's software development. I can still add music and pictures and do all of the things that have to do with disk access and management, but when it comes to things like firmware updates for the phone, I have to use Windows. :^/ Posted 117 days ago
|
You bring up compatibility, but you seem to have mistaken Apple for Microsoft. Microsoft has trouble keeping compatibility between versions of Office, much less with other platforms. There are still a lot of websites to this day that are incompatible with any browser but Internet Explorer for the specific reason that Microsoft eschewed compatibility with the agreed upon standards. Posted 110 days ago
|
Also, Mac /is/ compatible with other OS's. Mac+*nix=bliss, Mac+Windows=only mac can find windows... rarely vise versa. :^( in most cases ) Posted 114 days ago
|
Question makes no sense. That's like saying will a sedan beat a coup. They have two different purposes. The Mac and PC share general purpose attributes which makes the Mac the better system for a variety of reasons ( lack of virus, ease-of-use, security, etc). The PC is a gamers' rig. An area Apple has not sold into. Naturally, gamers will prefer PCs. In certain applications such as MS Excel, the PC has the larger installed base. Overall, if you measure the new comers onto the Mac or PC platforms, Apple is adding more users based on ipod, iphone, and other accessories sales. Mac Wins. Posted 117 days ago
|
With Mac's ease of use, which has always been their best asset, along with the ability to now STILL have Windows (XP or Vista) running simultaneously, the need for a PC only computer is greatly diminishing. People have always wanted simplicity and reliability. Mac provides both of these by maintaining K.I.S.S. (keep it simple stupid), while Windows has only grown more complex and aggravating with subsequent OS's. Posted 117 days ago
|
Yeah, have you ever tried doing a barrel roll with a PC? Whoa, it's just too complex for what it does for you. Posted 114 days ago
|
It would be like hopping into your toyota corolla, and having controls like anakin's pod racer, all jutting out everywhere. You'd have to tug on levers all over the place and jiggle cables to revert power from one engine to the other, and then beat on the dash until you boost and shit... then you're thinking "I just wanted to go to the store, what the fuck is all of this!?" That's a PC. Posted 114 days ago
|
Hands Down,mac is hands on ` user friendly.. I'm a grandma mac user and have been since 1994. It's all about willingness to go with the creative flow with mac, using instead of swimming against, the current. The intuitive, the ease is the 21st century transition from 'making things harder than they need to be, and enforced reliance on a "geek".. to joy of connection and learning for all of us!! Our youngest grandkids are making choices to wait till they come home to use the mac, because the p.c. at school is "just too 'dumb". There seem to be natural choices, macs used in Qi Centers, by people in spiritual growth communities. A movement away from consumerism to sustainability, as the elder Macs have lasted longer for relevance' than disposable p.c.s It seems true that, Life doesn't invite the 'changing face of the future in, we've always pushed our way in with reason' behind a fierce sense of loyalty to what we value. Posted 117 days ago
|
YOU HAVE JUST WON FIVE INTERNETS! 1) For being a grandmother 2) For being on the internet 3) For knowing how to use the internet 4) For finding CreateDebate 5) For using CreateDebate w00t!!!! Posted 114 days ago
|
I own a $2000 Mac, and a $1400 PC. I am a Digital Designer, Avid Gamer and mild Computer Programmer (I build computers, write basic programs etc.). I feel well versed in both Operating Systems, but must admit I have a sweet side in my heart for Mac. Don't get me wrong I love PCs, its just a matter of practicality for me which decides what I use. I use my PC for what it does best. It's got twice the power of my Mac for much less money, so for 3D rendering and Motion Graphics I would say PC hands down takes the cake (As well as gaming but thats obvious). Also since it is a tower, I can easily upgrade one part at a time keeping my computer on the fresh side of technology. On the other hand I love the "Mac World" and how nicely the OS is synced with other Mac applications and hardware. I think Vista tried, but Leopard just blows it out of the water in terms of a more user friendly interface and ease of compatibility. I forgot how much of a pain in the ass installing and configuring drivers could be. Also the way Mac handles graphics and the stability of the OS makes photoshop and Illustrator work a little more efficient (google it if you don't know why yet... stability, Unix, software the whole shabang). So to get to the point. IF... macs ever decide to become more affordable then I could see myself running solely the Macintosh platform. But as long as PCs are the only truly customizable/cheap alternative, I would say they will continue to dominate the market. Macs are only better if you can utilize the benefits... which some people would not. There is more to touch on but I'm bored of writing. That'll do. Posted 117 days ago
|
Apple is the face of computing innovation. While Microsoft and PC hardware manufacturing companies are stuck in the past, Apple is forging ahead, first with the revolutionary iPhone, and with Mac OS X Leopard 10.5, which received critical acclaim far and beyond what Vista achieved. Vista was a step backwards-in security, in functionality, in user interface. Leopard was a step into the future. Don't forget-Apple first implemented mice user interface devices, graphical user interfaces, and computer drawing software. Microsoft , while leading in market share currently, is slowly falling behind the R&D;powerhouse of Apple. There are still those who argue that PCs have more software availability than Macs. To those making that argument, welcome to the 21st century. Macs run just about every consumer application in existence, can run most games, and if you need more, just run Windows on a Mac (Boot Camp, VMWare, Parallels)! Mac bundled software (ahem...iLife) kicks bundled Windows software's ass and will continue to do so. Surely, Apple will overtake Microsoft's market share in personal computing, if not because of their innovation and technology, then because of their user-friendly interface, little to no learning curve, and simply functional software. Posted 114 days ago
|
It depends on what Microsoft does with it's next release. Windows right now is bloated, trying to support decades old technology and design patterns. The reason OS X still exists and is on the rise is because Apple basically started fresh with OS X (ok to be truthful all OS X is neXt, but fresh when compared to Old World macs), and in doing so allowed it to shed off all those old ideas and stop having to support bad design principles. Granted part of the reason they were able to do this and Microsoft wasn't was because they didn't have the enterprise install bass that Microsoft does, but that doesn't change the fact that it puts Apple in a better position now. So unless Microsoft has plans to radically change what they are doing now in comparison to Windows 7, they are going to be stuck in the same boat as they are now with Vista (Released late, bloated and full of inconsistencies). This doesn't even take into account the fact that Microsoft is rumored to make 7 modeler, which could serious hurt them where they are strongest, businesses. At this moment the brighter future looks for Apple, and I don't see that changing. Posted 113 days ago
|
Macs will eventually take over the computing market in terms of productivity. Mac book already have invaded the college life's of most students and have therefore shown they are better for such things such as word processing. But the real question is...how does Linux come into play? Posted 113 days ago
|
|