Will the Nuclear deals of India with US and other countries be beneficial to it?
Yes, I Agree
Side Score: 6
|
 |
NO
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
|
What is the use of this kind of energy? It is just a kind of slavery! All you do is to extract its energy and get pains and give gains to US and fold your hands and look on! But if the atomic plant just blows off, then there is no telling of the horrible happenings! US may lose its property a little, But it is not more than what we lose: Our lives! Side: No
|
Nuclear Deal with US is not a good deal for India, because after its deal India will lose its independence to make atomic products. It is only useful for India in one way that, after this dealing their energy power plant will become stronger but they will have no authority to do something in the nuclear research! Side: No
Indians will never learn from history. This nuclear deal that India has signed, is at the beginning of the cycle of history, when India lost its independence to the British. The British East India Company was a commercial outfit that came to India to buy Indian spices and gave the various kings of India arms and ammunitions as payment. To recover their debt , the Britishers East India Company took the payment in the form of rites for collecting taxes, and for which they needed to have their own soldiers and fortresses and clear control over the areas, and so on and so forth till they owned the entire country. The nuclear deal is for supply of nuclear materials to India, so that India will be able to generate electricity. Sounds very "reasonable". The suppliers need to be assured that the supply will not be misutilised, by India, which naturally would entitle them to conduct "inspections" in India. And the intelligence would inform the suppliers that India is creating and holding weapons of mass destruction aimed at attacking the suppliers, and so they should go to India and remove another tyrannical leader ( of course the tyrannical leader has also murdered a large number of innocent people ! ) and hang him high and keep their armed forces till the country becomes democratic again ! (see the pattern ?) Amen. Side: No
1
point
I agreed with the first half, but you lost me on the second. India's a famously non interventionist and peaceful country (Kashmir being the only real exception). It's also public knowledge that India's holding WMDs, they've openly had nuclear weapons for over 35 years now. There has also been no evidence that they're 'aimed' at suppliers, despite numerous IAEA inspections of their nuclear facilities. I understand the parallels, but they only stretch so far. You seem to have let your imagination run away with you a bit. Side: Yes, I agree
|
