Without counting illegals in census, the Democrats wouldn't have the House
True
Side Score: 11
|
 |
Shut that Native up
Side Score: 2
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
|
Without counting illegals in census, the Democrats wouldn't have the House Hello bront: You're talking about the 2010 census, right?? The one that gave Republicans control of just about every state? The census that put Donald Trump in office??? DUDE!!! If the 2010 census was SOOOO valuable to the Democrats, how come it took them 8 years to win the House??? DUDE! excon Side: Shut that Native up
1
point
You're talking about the 2010 census, right?? The one that gave Republicans control of just about every state? The census that put Donald Trump in office??? DUDE!!! Your logic doesn't follow the premise. Illegals flock to liberal areas called "sanctuary cities" in mass. Due to this influx, the census, which doesn't ask about citizenship, counts all illegals when passing out how many representatives areas get. In other words, without counting illegals, the Democrats would have less representatives in the House. This is why the Democrats are going berserk over "are you an American citizen" being on the next census questionnaire. They need those illegals counted. Side: True
1
point
If the 2010 census was SOOOO valuable to the Democrats, how come it took them 8 years to win the House?? They would have NEVER won the House without counting illegals. That's the whole point. Those seats would have literally not existed due to lib areas having smaller LEGAL populations. You get more representatives if you have more people. Democrats can't have illegals not counted. Side: True
|
