CreateDebate


Debate Info

11
2
Yes, the world would be better No, potheads are bad
Debate Score:13
Arguments:11
Total Votes:13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes, the world would be better (9)
 
 No, potheads are bad (2)

Debate Creator

ThinkerLad(267) pic



Would legalisation of marijuana be more beneficial for the world?

Please, only evidence based argumentation here. No anecdotal views, for example, "My legs went weird, so we shouldn't allow it." 

Have fun :)

Yes, the world would be better

Side Score: 11
VS.

No, potheads are bad

Side Score: 2

The world would be able to generate plenty of money from the legalization of marijuana, so, hunger could be greatly reduced, poverty can be reduced, and the revenue could be used toward Education.

Side: Yes, the world would be better
1 point

How can poverty be reduced when people start getting hooked to marijuana and start using up their monthly pay for marijuana instead of their well being

Side: No, potheads are bad
1 point

That can be said for almost anything, Joel. It is often the case for alcohol and cigarettes, but the difference is that marijuana, at least, isn't addictive or massively self destructive (physiologically).

Side: Yes, the world would be better
ThinkerLad(267) Disputed
1 point

Agreed, and indeed not only would hunger, poverty etc. be reduced but hemp products would also reduce the need for oil/fuel requirements, which would essentially mean we wouldn't need to go to the middle-east for fuel and non-biodegradeable plastics, which are a major contribution to landfill and contaminating the land.

Side: Yes, the world would be better
1 point

Agreed, and indeed not only would hunger, poverty etc. be reduced but hemp products would also reduce the need for oil/fuel requirements, which would essentially mean we wouldn't need to go to the middle-east for fuel and non-biodegradeable plastics, which are a major contribution to landfill and contaminating the land.

Side: Yes, the world would be better
1 point

Using hemp products would be a good alternative to the high carbon footprint and degree of resources required to produce cotton.

Side: Yes, the world would be better
1 point

There are many people who believe that the "war on drugs" is a lost cause because policy makers are looking down the wrong end of the telescope. In effect policies worsen the problem by making it illegal. However it takes a lot of effort by agencies to encourage bureaucrats to think outside of the box. Injecting rooms and legal pharmaceuticals have been effective in managing opiate addiction. So there are alternatives to prohibition and there is an economic value for tax revenue for controlled legislation of marijuana

Side: Yes, the world would be better
1 point

Yes it would. I believe, that there should be small boxes of weed, on every street corner. Whenever people get scared, they want it to be illegal. Why? Just put drugs on every street corner, so that when people go by they either say:" Oh that's drugs, that's not for me". Or they would say:" Hell yeah drugs. Give me". Its an individual choice. So you don't want to take drugs? Dont take them! Its your choice, but dont take that freedom from other people.

Side: Yes, the world would be better
1 point

I thank the government for not legalising it as they probably care for their citizen's health... What is the Koreans wanted to nuke America, everyone would already be dead because of overuse of marijuana.. There..

Side: No, potheads are bad
ThinkerLad(267) Disputed
1 point

Give me one shred of evidence for a death caused by marijuana.

Only one case has been reported where a lady smoked marijuana and then died in her sleep from a heart attack, but the evidence that this was caused by the marijuana was slim. She was a regular user as well.

Side: Yes, the world would be better
1 point

I am not sure if you think this because Marijuana hasn't gained much traction in Singapore (correct me if I am mistaken but I believe that's where you are from), but Cannabis does not kill people. It doesn't even cause serious long term health effects so long as the person partaking is over ~21.

Side: Yes, the world would be better
No arguments found. Add one!