You don't react to terrorism. You prevent it in the first place.
True
Side Score: 23
|
 |
Wrong
Side Score: 21
|
|
|
|
|
Too late was the cry. Your words of wisdom were being bellowed more than 60 years ago, (check out Enoch Powell's, river of 'blood speech', which didn't include those exact words,) by everyone, but our politicians knew better. Almost everyone, including the dogs in the street knew what was going to happen but still the politicians whom we, the dumb electorate voted into power swamped the countries of the west with the filth who are, and with increasing ferocity, will continue to commit acts of deadly terrorism on the populations of the countries which welcomed and gave them sanctuary in their hour of need. In the final analysis it was the people who failed to remove the liberal shits from office at the ballot boxes, so I say, ''SLAP IT UP YE''. Mr. Muslim terrorist has a lot of 'nice little surprises' for the men women and children of the west, only they'll not be so nice nor so little and they'll certainly not be a surprise.. Side: True
|
2
points
2
points
2
points
1
point
No, they do exist. And they are a direct result of people manipulating others using religion. That doesn't change the fact that the number of muslims involved in these groups are in the ten thousands compared to the more than a billion muslims in the world. Banning all Muslims is a ridiculously extreme reaction, and would only serve to ostracize and radicalize more. But by the way, have you read the old testament? There's nothing in Islam that's worse than what the Torah advocates for. Even if you use the whole "The New Testament makes it ok" excuse, why aren't you trying to ban all Jews? Side: Wrong
1
point
The time to enact the old adage, prevention is better than cure, has long since come and gone. Every western type democracy from Australia to Canada and from the U.S.A, to all of Europe, especially Europe, have ''sleeper cells' of Muslim terrorists waiting for instructions when, where and how to strike. As the western governments continue to import more Muslims so the terrorist threat will increase proportionately as each new batch of so called Muslim refugees will have a % of dedicated terrorists and a further % who will be radicalized and become terrorists. I'm certain that future generations will curse us as the generation which introduced the Muslim terrorists into their countries. No such stupidities for the likes of China, Russia or Japan nor the oil rich Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia. Think of the $billions, if not trillions it costs to try to protect the citizens of the free western nations from Muslim terrorists. All these $ trillions could have been used to build hospitals and schools. Think of the ridiculous security measures we all have to endure every time we travel, endless queues of people waiting to go through X ray machines, 'pat down searches' shoes, belts, money, watches, cell phones, or any other metal object all have to be removed and placed into a tray for collection at the other side of the scanners. All of this and more thanks to our politicians and the imported Muslim terrorists. What do we, the people do? We stand in these endless queues, spout our outrage after every Muslim terrorist atrocity and then vote the same guilty politicians back into power so we can have more of the same. Well, we truly deserve all we get, and believe men, we're going to 'get it'. Side: Wrong
It's some of both, which is why I voted on this side. I'm all for prevention. It's just sometimes you literally do have to blow someone up before they blow you up. Your plan works for people potentially in the pipeline, but it doesn't stop those ready to pull the trigger. Side: Wrong
List of Islamic Terror: 2016 During this time period, there were 2477 Islamic attacks in 59 countries, in which 21240 people were killed and 26680 injured. Lot of people killed and a lot of people injured but you can't really say that belongs to a particular religion now can you Progressive ! Side: True
Hello again, outlaw: Even IF I accept your number, let's look at the math.. If you divide the number of attacks (2,477) by the worldwide population of Muslims (1.5 BILLION), you end up with a .00000000066% participation by Muslims.. So, NO. I wouldn't ascribe these attacks to a particular religion.. Yes, my rightwing friend.. Math is HARD.. excon Side: Wrong
If you know there is in fact a plot for terrorist activity. You need to do all you can to stop it. In that sense that is the truth. However, it is critically important to separate terrorist from Muslim. Simply attacking the Muslim community because one "may" be a terrorist is an act of terrorism itself. Side: Wrong
|
