CreateDebate


Debate Info

10
12
True. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:22
Arguments:17
Total Votes:25
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (7)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (8)

Debate Creator

jolie(9810) pic



Your fetishes are nothing to be ashamed about.

Unless your fetish is to be publicly humiliated.  Then you should be VERY ashamed, you nasty little pervert ;)

True.

Side Score: 10
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 12
3 points

Half the people on this site fall under that category when you consider their posts ;)

Side: True.
1 point

Look right over here class: we can see Jolie trying yet again to push people to do a lewd debate

Side: True.
1 point

; )

Side: True.
1 point

True, up to the point you are hurting someone (against their will). ............................................

Side: True.
1 point

Hello j:

I agree.. That's why I've never denied diddling my Hoover. I've even contemplated marriage.. What? I'm a lib... I'm SURE we have a classification for Hoovers.

excon

Side: True.
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

ROTFFLMMFAO at the age of 74 you have never been married Super Stupid ! That is toooo damn funny !

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
-1 points

I love men. Men are sexy. Yum..........................................................................................................

Side: True.
Atrag(5666) Disputed
1 point

1) that is not a fetish 2) you have never had sexual intercourse. Getting yourself raped doesn't count.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
KJVPrewrath(967) Disputed
1 point

I want to hgave sex with a black man. MMMM, chocolate...............................................................

Side: True.
2 points

I'm proud of my style of pervertism! I've had a LOT of those li'l kitties in my hand and never ONCE been accused of "sexual molestation"! Nothing to be ashamed about! ;-)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
2 points

Even though I happen to be posting in this section, this premise is too vague to make a real argument. Fetishes can range from harmless activities that may not involve sexual gratification, but as strong or obsessive inclination for some type of activity. Most likely Sexual Fetish is being referred to here, which can be a harmless source of pleasure or one that might exist on the opposite side of the spectrum. Fetishes have been known to become so extreme, that said activities may involve the murder of another human being, such is the case of Armin Meiwes.

Whether or not an individual should feel embarrassed or guilty depends how the person decides to react to the public knowledge of their own fetish. On the other hand, it can be viewed from society as a diabolical act which should have consequences including shame or traditional punishments. If this is the case, then I must say there are situations where fetishes should be something to be ashamed about. Mainly for the sake of instilling moral values into others.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
3 points

I think you're taking this debate way too seriously ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

@Jolie - Unfortunately there are more than a few disgustingly shameful fetishes, so disgusting I can't even name them. Maybe you're just in denial.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

Paedophilia is something to be ashamed about :P

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!