Debate Stats:

Debate Score:27
Arguments:19
Total Votes:31
Ends:Never
View More Stats

Argument Tags:

side graph
All Tags
 
 madman and a genius (6)
 
 A madman is a pissed of genius (3)
 
 Success (3)

Debate Creator:

alienevolved(26)
pic



Are you trying to figure out how this debate works? Show Quick Tips

define the difference between a madman and a genius!

a madman and a genius!

Can it be that the difference is that a madman does not realize when his/her thought processes become absurd or destructive and cannot recover while the genius builds upon his/her failures in a well thought out and sensible manner which will eventually bring success?

Posted 78 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

constructive or destructive tendencies, yes! the only difference being the intention

well done your a well thought out and sensible genius, its been a pleasure talking with you Kuklapolitan

Posted 78 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

A genius is a successful madman.

Posted 78 days ago | Tagged As: Success
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

your getting warm!!!but still no cookie!! still too vague,a definition must encompass all of its aspects directly.

are you pissed off yet and mad???

joe cavalry had good go this afternoon!

Posted 78 days ago | Tagged As: Success
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

this attempt is also close but we are missing a defining relativistic factor here!!

A genius IS a successful madman,but success or failure isnt relative to the question

salvador dali was a successful madman therefore a genius without doubt,what makes him a genius but hitler a failed madman?

Posted 78 days ago | Tagged As: madman and a genius
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

definitions only people,none of this, its a fine line, rubbish!!

Posted 79 days ago | Tagged As: madman and a genius
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

A madman is lunatic, insane, someone who suffers from mental disorders. A genius is quite the opposite and not to be confused with an idiot savant. A genius is someone with extraordinary mental powers and high aptitudes. You say that if one gives an answer alluding to "a fine line" between the two that it's "rubbish" but that is not so. There have been people who have slipped from genius to madman over time and those who were perceived to be madmen who turned out to be geniuses. A member of the first category being someone like Vincent Van Gogh or Ludwig Van Beethoven and the latter being someone like Immunologist, Paul Ehrlich or Louis Pasteur, who discovered the cures for Syphilis, Sleeping Sickness, Anthrax, Rabies and proved that disease causing microorganisms were at the core of all illness and death. Before Ehrlich and Pasteur, no doctor washed his hands or made his instruments clean and sanitary which accounted for the many deaths from child bed fever. Their contemporaries, all renowned physicians, thought them madmen...but they were most certainly not. Both were geniuses.

Posted 79 days ago | Tagged As: There can be a fine line
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

your answer doesnt define the line though does it!

i want a concise definition not a essay on madmen and geniuses!

they cant be "quite opposites" if there is a fine line between them both can they?!

nice try though!

Posted 79 days ago | Tagged As: madman and a genius
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

Yes alien they can be, by definition. Sorry I didn't know you wanted the process...that would have been a dissertation indeed. Perhaps the good vs. evil that co-exist in madmen and geniuses are part of that.

Posted 78 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

there is a definition,but if i reveal now, theres no fun in it is there!!

slipping from genius to madman doesnt explain the process involved,no more than being a genius means you will be acknowledged as such.

merely an observation.

Posted 79 days ago | Tagged As: madman and a genius
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

A madman is a pissed of genius.

Posted 79 days ago | Tagged As: A madman is a pissed of genius
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

A genius is a person with a lot of knowledge but who recognizes the fact that there's still much more to know which may invalidate some of his perceived knowledge.

A madman is a person with a lot of knowledge who thinks his knowledge is infallible.

Posted 79 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

not bad, but recognizing your infallibility,doesnt explain where the road forks as it were!!

the pissed off genius is close but needs refining!

just not direct enough!!

hitler recognized his infallibility,but was clearly one rizla short of a spliff,to coin a phrase!

Posted 79 days ago | Tagged As: A madman is a pissed of genius
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

OK, I'll try again.

A madman is a pissed off genius determined to make the world right according to what he considers right based on his knowledge.

Posted 79 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

A madman is a genius without a sense of humor.

Posted 79 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

the difference between a madman and a genius is thus,

a genius uses his madness constructively,whereas a madman will use his genius destructively,intention being the defining factor.

david tennant as the dr who character uses his madness constructively.the best doctor by far!!then tom baker was good too ,maybe i should start a debate on it!

Posted 78 days ago | Tagged As: madman and a genius
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

kuklapolitan and jessaid and joe its been a pleasure. you tube debates can be so primitive, i love this place though!!

Posted 78 days ago


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Newsletter Archive
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Sharing Tools
Send Beta Invites
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Legal Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Creative Commons

©2008 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.