do aliens really exist?
aliens have been fascinating the humans now much than before. but it's a matter of confusion even today if aliens really exist?
yes
Side Score: 18
Winning Side! |
no
Side Score: 11
|
|
|
|
2
points
2
points
There have been several places in the universe that lie within a "Goldilocks zone" in which life as we know it is possible. So just on that we know life exists elsewhere as about 54 zones all failing to produce life is next to impossible. And that is just life as we know it, organisms based on carbon are all we know of so far. Who knows what the future will bring. Side: yes
2
points
1
point
There are 10^21 stars in the Universe approximately. By comparison there are only about 10^19 grains of sand on all of Earth. Given that it seems most start have planets, even if life forming is like 1 in a trillion chance there would be billions upon billions of living things outside of Earth. I doubt any have got this far, given the distances and speed of light problem, but maybe something out their will figure it out someday. Side: yes
Belief in Aliens is the converse to belief in God. Like was said before me there are 10^21 starts in the sky, and even that is probably low-balling it. Most star systems have some form of celestial bodies in them. There is a group of students and professors at Oxford (I think, it's definitely a university in England) that are devoted to thinking of ways alien life might manifest. You don't have to subscribe to the Ancient Aliens theory to accept that the simple odds say that somewhere there's something else out there. So this is like the opposite of the God debate, as we understand science more we see God in the picture less and less, as we find out that the universe has all these rules that led to the creation of everything. With aliens, the more we understand about the universe, the vast distances, the massive amounts of stars in the sky, and now rogue planets which apparently escape the gravity of their own stars all the time, it becomes more and more likely that somewhere, somewhen there was life in outer space. I would define the "goldilocks" term for people unfamiliar, as the appropriate distance and orbit from a star, taking into account the different life-cycles and types of stars, for life as we know it to form on a planet. We've discovered several planets that fit into this category, and we know that all the elements present here that also helped life develop are common through out the universe. There is even a theory suspecting that the original single-celled organisms on this planet were actually frozen in an asteroid from some other ancient planet that crashed on earth billions of years ago and kick started life here; which is completely plausible. I have to say the odds and facts are with us on this argument. No we have never seen evidence of aliens (other than bacteria on mars, which renders this debate moot anyways), but neither have we developed the means to observe active, large alien life on other planets. Side: yes
While I agree that there is no substantial evidence to suggest there are indeed creatures like us outside of Earth (remains, visits, etc) logic can persuade you to believe the highly likely event that there are. It's very unlikely that we are the only creature of our kind, there are tons of solar systems out there, many who are probably all subject to evolution as we are. Thus, somewhere along the line, resulting in a far more advanced animal like we are, one that has what we consider "intelligence" and "consciousness" (my operational definition of that would be: An awareness of awareness, we are aware that we are aware/alert/thinking with an individual "I"). Side: quite possible
|
Oh yeah, I'm that much of an awesome person. Side: No
1
point
no, it's because there is no evidence of their existence. for instance, we can not see air, but we have evidence of its existence. The most valid argument is that there are planets that can support life. I say it's valid because this is true (unlike other alien arguments). but this is not a good argument for alien existence because the conditions themselves do not prove life. they just prove conditions. Side: No
There's no evidentiary connection between UFOs and aliens. There's no connection between abduction phenomena and aliens. While these occurrences are often ATTRIBUTED to aliens by those who want to believe in them, there's simply no evidence for the connection. It's wishful thinking. What people see or say they have experienced in their sleep is irrelevant to the question of whether aliens exist somewhere in the universe. Side: No
1
point
1
point
In my opinion, what would be more profound that discovering that there is itelligent life or 'aliens' would be discovering that there is no itelligent lifeforms other than what occupies earth. What would that mean for human life? or what kind of responsilbilty would that give us? What would the pope say then? Side: no
|