CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:40
Arguments:21
Total Votes:49
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 is meat necesarry (21)

Debate Creator

ruth(6) pic



is meat necesarry

Add New Argument
3 points

We've been through this before. Meat is not essential to health. We can get protein from so much more and meat is unnecessary. But I'm still going to eat it because I like it.

Side: It is unnecessary
1 point

The unnecessary downvoting must stop. I'm upvoting this because it doesn't deserve a downvote. This is ludicrous.

Side: It is unnecessary
2 points

i dont think meat is necessary because it is interfering into the ecosystem and it is killing lot of animals and that not fair cause they have feelings and they shoul be allowed to live

Side: It is unnecessary
pujolspals(198) Disputed
0 points

Hunting is good man. Consider deer hunting. Deer just run onto the road willy-nilly. Without hunters, there would be many more accidents. And what would we do without bacon, cheeseburgers, or steak? They are AWESOME.

Side: It is unnecessary
MKIced(2483) Disputed
6 points

OR we could reintroduce apex predators to kill the deer, like...... the wolf. Wolves were killed off of the east coast a looooong time ago (like 150 years ago) and now deer have no natural predator. Bring back the wolves to kill the deer! :)

Side: It is unnecessary
ta9798(316) Disputed
3 points

Seriously? Your argument basically said that it is the deers fault that it gets hit by a vehicle. Hunters aren't a reliable or major way to prevent accidents involving deer. The best form is to reintroduce natural predators (wolves, pumas) like MKIced said. Natural predators maintain an equalization that allows the ecosystem to function efficiently.

Side: It is unnecessary
1 point

If we can survive without it, then it isn't really necessary. And yes, we can survive without it.

Side: It is unnecessary
1 point

i think it helps alot. god put animals for us to eat, not to have for decorations.

Side: It is unnecessary