Debate Info

38
55
Yes, I agree. No, I do not agree.
Debate Score:93
Arguments:38
Total Votes:153
Ends:09/30/15
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes, I agree. (12)
 
 No, I do not agree. (24)

Debate Creator

msmagsng(24) pic



s2-05 Social media has made us less 'social'. Do you agree?

State your stand to the above issue.

Back up your stand with reasons/ facts/ evidence. Use the P-E-E-L method to help you.

Yes, I agree.

Side Score: 38
VS.

No, I do not agree.

Side Score: 55
6 points

The original intention of social media is to connect different people together. Granted, people who use social media wants to connect with other people. However, this wanting to connect with other people has also taken its toll on making people less 'social'.

In Singapore, the smartphone penetration rate is about 54% and has 8.1 million mobile subscription. This means that Singapore has the highest amount of smartphone users to the population. This high smartphone and mobile subscription rates gives Singaporeans more access to social media such as Facebook, Twitter etc. on the go. Hence, rather than reading the newspaper or communicating with friends on, for instance, a train, people will be on social media instead.

In most developed western countries, the penetration rate is more than 50%. In North America alone, the penetration rate of social media is about 77%. Facebook in North America has a penetration rate of ~45%. This means that instead of communicating the old fashion way through phone or meeting up personally, more people tend to communicate through 'chat' functions on Facebook. Thus making phones to communicate an oblivion.

Youtube and other video sharing sites has also played an important role in our lives. This is because when we are free and has nothing to do, we don't really go meet up with people. But rather more of the younger generation tend to go on Youtube to spend their time.

Granted people may have different stands, but the bottom line is that we are spending more and more time on social networking sites. This may take a toll on us as we may not really have physical meeting with others which may make us less social.

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
ggp9(1) Disputed
1 point  

Today the world has become a smaller place to live in. We have friends all over the world. One can still stay connected to his/her friends who are far far away via the Social Media where physical meeting is quite difficult. Where would they be connected if there was no social platform- Fb Skype to name a few. We can still be friends and share our ideas and moments with people far away from us just by an account in fb, skype etc. Imagine meeting up a friend after a long long time and both of them have no idea what is going on in their life. How difficult it would be to patch up again?

129 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
4 points

Social media the new step in the social scene, people from every corner for the world can come together and enjoy similar things. The networks do, however, remove much of the older types of socialisation where people meet up to do things together and talk in person. There is less of actually seeing people and more staring at computer screens.

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
2 points

Social Media has made us less social as its convenience makes us lazy to do things in person. For example, people would rather chat through chat platforms instead of meeting in person to catch up with the times. This shows that because of its, convenience, we take it for granted and use it as our main way to "meet" people.

~Vinyl

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
1 point  

Social Media has made us less social as its convenience makes us lazy to do things in person. For example, people would rather chat through chat platforms instead of meeting in person to catch up with the times by using facebook,twitter. This shows that because of its convenience, we take it for granted and use it as our main way to "meet" people. This may be because we are to lazy and have to use these such methods, but as we use it more and more often, we have adapted to it and use it as our main way of "socializing" (Redo)

~Vinyl Scratch

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
dzdz(4) Disputed
1 point  

This isn't true, meeting up in real life will never beat a videochat, or textchat or audio chat at all. It will be more enjoyable when you do anythings with friends, so I don' think the human race will want to disregard that source of fun in life.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
2 points

The social media networking site (Facebook) has garnered more than 93 million users is Asia alone. Even though these sites can be used to contact our friends/family oversea or find a long lost friend whom you haven't been in contact for a long time. But according many sources, it shows that many that many people has been increasingly texting and social networking during meal time or in the bedroom have become commonplace. 24% of people surveyed have missed important moments in person because they were busy trying to shares those moments on the social network.

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
NicholasLee(2) Disputed
3 points

That just proves they have an addiction, it isn't the fault of social media.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
dzdz(4) Clarified
1 point  

What do you mean busy trying to shares those moments on the social network? Wouldn't that mean that the person was there themselves at the moment?

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
2 points

Well Since classroom debates have gone online i say yes.

.

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
1 point  

It makes us all walk around with our heads in our phones. That is anti-social!

226 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
1 point  

Yes, social media does make us less social. It is like that car commercial with the daughter on Facebook talking about here parents not being social, when really her parents are out living life with real friends.

I have a friend who is crazy about Facebook. He will post about 50 messages a day. His mom also has Facebook. She spends all day on it and will post tons of things every day. Instead of talking to her son, she will post messages on his wall.

59 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
0 points

Social media has made people more shy, less willing to have a face to face conversation. We have become anti-social to each other, preferring to send text messages or emails instead of writing a physical letter.

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
0 points

Social media encourages very distant contact and it is apparent that it is replacing more 'normal' forms of social interaction like going out to places and face to face conversations as many people prefer chatting online because it's more convenient. Thus, social media has made people less 'social' in the more traditional sense.

pizzaaaaaaaa

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
5 points

Social Media is very useful for many things and some those useful options let us become more social. For example, when we left primary school for secondary school, we had to part with our primary school friends but with social media, it helps us contact each other and communicate occasionally. Sometimes we decide to hold outings and social media helps us organise these events easily and more efficiently. This tells me that social media makes us more social then less as it lets us communicate more, which is being more social. Therefore, I do not agree with this view.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
4 points

No matter whether is it online or in real life, people still communicate with each other. People did not become less social at all. In fact, people still socialize regardless of the platform. Social media is to add on to the real life so people can communicate without seeing each other face to face. Thus, I do not agree.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
4 points

The term 'social media' is normally associated with sites such as Facebook and Twitter, where people can interact with one another via the Internet. Social media allows people who have lost physical contact with one another to be able to interact with one another over the Internet. This allows people to socialise with not only with past friends, whom they have lost physical contact with, but also make new ones through the social media and it allows people to be more social with more people.

~Jovan~

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
3 points

I do not agree with the statement. The Internet commercialized with the intention of being a forum for Science and Technology. However over the decades, it has evolved into something that was unimaginable years ago. Today, social networking sites have become an indispensable part of our lives. Social networking sites have now became a personal part of our lives.

We are now in the transition of integrating social networking sites into conventional social. Cyberspace is a new medium for us to interact with others socially. We may potentially be able to reach out to a larger reach of audience compared to traditional socialization with cyber space.

However, we may not be as close as our neighbours as we used to be, we could be closer to someone on the other side of the planet.

(Ugh, I'm too lazy to type more)

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
2 points

I do not agree because social media is just another platform in a way to socialise, communicate and so so much more. In my opinion, social media is just an add on to the current socialising in real life and thus improving socialising and not making us less social at all, infact doing the complete opposite.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
0 points

In addition, social media has many benefits that real life socialising can't provide. The convenience and ease to use it at any time. It is very easy to make appointments or events with online events as people will be notified and there will be a notification. This is great in the fact it contributes to real life socialising and making us more social in the end.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
2 points

I do not agree with this statement because I feel that no matter where they go in their lives they are bound to have to make new friends. Even if they already have friends whom they frequently talk to online, it does not mean that they are not sociable in real life because the time they spend talking to each other online might be the same or even less then the time spent talking to each other in real life. Social media can also be used to meet new friends and getting to know them before you talk to them in real life. But of course face to face interaction would have its pros and cons too. Therefore I disagree that social media has made us less 'social'.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
2 points

I disagree as social media open the more platform for people to social. Socializing have become much more easier because of the platform such as Facebook, Twitter and Skype. This enable friends to talk to each other even without seeing each other. People can also "add friends" on the social platform, he or she can make new friends that easy. Platform such as Skype, enable people to video chat with each other from different part of the whole. Therefore, socializing have been much more convenient and easier, furthermore the range of friends is wide.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
tanyieern(1) Disputed
1 point  

People having a conversation on the using facebook is very antisocial. E.g. using "lol" as answer for everything.

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
choyrz(2) Clarified
2 points

I disagree that having a conversation on Facebook is very antisocial. People use the internet language during the conversation, however that does not make people antisocial as the main purpose of the conversation is to talk to each other and socialise is still there, what is being affected using the internet language is english.

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
2 points

I do not agree that social media have made up less ‘social'. This is because research have shown that teenagers spent an average of 6 hours each month on social media. 6 hours is considered as a small portion in the whole month. The remaining time, they will most likely going outdoor with families and friends. Therefore, this proves that social media have not make us less ‘social’.

-Yan Kai

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
2 points

I do not agree. Social media has helped people stay in contact when they are not able to see each other. It does not make us less social as we still interact with our friends and family. Social media does not cause us to be less social, addiction does. It is not the fault of social media that we are less social.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

I DO NOT AGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT. After people leave their primary school or if they part ways with their friends. Most of the time they lose contacts and they cannot contact each other. With social media websites such as facebook or twitter, they can contact each other and create groups and chat online. Social media may even make us more social instead of less social.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

Social media makes people more social on the internet, because there are more chances to interact with people.

-Not Vader

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
ruosong_pey(2) Disputed
2 points

That may be true, however, as more people spend more time on the internet, they will spend less time and may be unwilling to 'socialise' in the physical world.

236 days ago | Side: Yes, I agree.
1 point  

I disagree as social media open more platform for people to social. Socializing have become much more easier because of the platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Skype. This enable friends to talk to each other even without seeing each other. People can also "add friends" on the social platform, he or she can make new friends that easily. Social Platforms such as Skype, enable people to video chat with each other from different part of the whole. Therefore, socializing have been much more convenient and easier, furthermore the range of friends is wide.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

What's up with all of these same debates from classrooms, or whatever? I'v seen this exact same debate pop up over and over and continue to be within the "active debate/popular debate" area.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

I know it gets annoying but points are points.

.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

What is with all these repeat debates get creative!

.

235 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

I don't think you guys understand the concept of the down-vote button

235 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

The Down-vote button is not supposed to be used t down vote arguments just because you don't like there views.

235 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

Or something like that.

.

235 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
1 point  

Social media is just another way to socialise with others. Although I would prefer meeting up in real life more, but that does not mean that I do not like social media. It will not, and shall not, make me like social. yes, a video chat can be more convenient if you have to use the computer, then you can do things and talk at the same time, is that not multi-tasking?

235 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
0 points

No, I do not agree with this statement. We have instead, became more social with the outside world. We have became so social that we are releasing our personal information to hundreds of friends and even strangers. However, most of us don't realize that our personal data and privacy in cyberspace is being released.

Most of us, if not all of us use social networking sites here; we all spend countless hours on these sites. We share many things that we think is interesting. We post status updates, to microblogs and check-in at places. This is when things can go really wrong. Your privacy is yours to safekeep.

Most of us here believe that the internet is relatively safe. However, most of us lack a simple oversight of ours can lead to many unknown fears and dangers. We believe that all of us should take the necessary steps to avert the dangers that we may face on the Internet.

Before that, let’s recall what was the Internet intended for when it was conceived.

The Internet started off with the original intent for military purposes. It slowly became commercialized with the intention of being a forum for Science and Technology. However over the decades, it has evolved into something that was unimaginable years ago. Presently, hundreds of games, websites and applications are springing up on the Internet. Despite that, the threats against users of the Internet also becomes increasingly higher.

Today, social networking sites have become an indispensable part of our lives. However, we may not like to share some of that information with certain kinds of people. If you do not take action to protect your information online, you could become a victim of blackmailing, invasion of privacy, stalking and many others.

Now, you may ask, what is this all about? This is about your safety and your wellbeing. This is about your privacy. Privacy should be safeguarded when we are online. Some of us here may put almost all of our personal information on these sites: full names, phone numbers; maybe even very private things such as address of residence and many more. Imagine all of this information available for anyone to see; not protected, they can and will lead to dire consequences.

I propose that you take more effort to protect your privacy online. Remember, your privacy is YOUR responsibility. Thank you.

236 days ago | Side: No, I do not agree.
Popular Debates in Technology: Is technology addictive? Television is the leading cause of violence in today's society. i just turned bikinilover...



About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2013 TidyLife, Inc. All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Debate Forum | Big shout-outs to The Bloggess and Andy Cohen.