CreateDebate


Debate Info

19
8
should be banned shortuld be kept as a spo
Debate Score:27
Arguments:13
Total Votes:32
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 should be banned (10)
 
 shortuld be kept as a spo (3)

Debate Creator

macz123(5) pic



should fox hunting be banned

should be banned

Side Score: 19
VS.

shortuld be kept as a spo

Side Score: 8
3 points

In the future, much bigger and smarter creatures will appear and have a debate on whether human hunting should be banned or not.

Side: should be banned
2 points

This is so funny because it is quite possibly true , who knows , but hey i agree!

Side: should be banned
1 point

Hahaha yeah I love this one.

Once some aliens from another planet start hunting humans then those hypocritical cunts will be talking about how immoral it is.

Side: should be banned
2 points

The Hunting Act 2004 must not be repealed or otherwise undone. If anything, it needs strengthening so that we can be sure that chasing and killing wild animals for fun is clearly and for ever unlawful and regarded by all with well-deserved revulsion. If Cameron, Hague, Herbert, etc., think that repeal of the Act would be a vote winner in rural areas, they are very much mistaken.

Side: should be banned
1 point

Love the comments about the bigger creatures getting the humans! :-)

Foxhunting should be banned. There is no case for repeal. Hunt numbers are up all over the country. Drag hunting is legal. The sense of community, pageantry, heritage, and jobs are all still intact and yet these disgraceful people can’t manage to enjoy themselves unless they are terrifying and killing animals.

Please if you support the hunting act, get your name on the R.O.A.R. (Register Online Against Repeal), an ‘all party’ list at: http://www.campaignfordecency.org.uk

Please make your voices heard!

Side: should be banned

I see no purpose in fox hunting. It's just ridiculous to chase a fox around and then have someone shoot the poor creature.

Side: should be banned
0 points

I only say ban it cause it's not a fair fight.

If the foxes had guns - they should go for it.

Hunters are a bunch of pussies with guns trying to feel big. If they were real men theyd go out on their own and hunt a fox with their bare hands. Then I wouldn't have a problem with it. The problem is there aren't any real men who actually want to hunt foxes....

Side: should be banned
MKIced(2511) Disputed
3 points

My only problem with this is that humans were not designed to hunt their prey with their bare hands. We have opposable thumbs and very complex brains, both of which combine to create a great duo for building weapons and critical thinking. Humans are also not very strong compared to many other animals. There's no way we'd ever survive without our primitive weapons at the very least.

Side: shortuld be kept as a spo
Kinda(1649) Disputed
2 points

So all those who argue that humans are 'naturally' superior to animals are actually chatting shit because a human would get ripped apart by most animals of a similar size.

The only reason we've survived is because of our (arguably) unnaturally powerful brains. People who hunt don't do it for their brains, but for the same reason men buy porsches. They have small cocks.

Side: should be banned
2 points

Who cares about the foxes, their only stupid animals. Yes, I know that there will be some who say that animals are our relatives or someother idiocy like that. Fact is, there is no proof. So what if so-called scientists say we are related, many 'missing links' have been proven to be either hoaxes or 'mistakes'. Besides, these are the same people who are saying that the world is heating up, and what happens? FLORIDA IS FROZEN!!! Besides, foxes, like any other living creature, is food to us humans. We need meat, it is an important source of protein. If carnivorous animals (our so-called 'cousins') can eat animals; why can't we?

Side: shortuld be kept as a spo
No arguments found. Add one!