should the minimum length of the argument remain 50?
Yeap
Side Score: 3
|
Nope!
Side Score: 7
|
|
|
|
1
point
|
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible. I don't think this kind of restriction can really helP! just like how i did it now Side: Nope!
2
points
In real life people's arguments are much longer than 50 characters. Why should it be different on line? If you are too embarrassed because someone disputed your argument with a bunch of evidence that makes you look bad, then that is your problem and maybe you should do a better job next time. Side: Nope!
1
point
1
point
|