suppressed evidence of the Bible
The critical comments at the bottom of that youtube video already fully countered it. I'll just add that what's in or out of the Bible has already been hotly contested for centuries by the believers themselves so if indeed anything has been suppressed it's primarily by the believers themselves. This shows once again that you like to run your big mouth before you know what you are talking about. It sounds like you didn't watch the video which shows a site in Saudi Arabia that is fenced off and guarded to keep people away. This is the main point of the video, that archeological evidence supporting the Bible is suppressed. Why don't you talk about the video as if you actually watched it, and shut your stupid mouth talking about your stupid feelings and beliefs which have nothing to do with the OP or the topic of discussion here....and you wonder why I ban you? Your behavior is why I was shocked to hear you claim to be over 30 years old. 1
point
The video is about archeological sites and relics. They are real things, completely in agreement with the Biblical historical account. If you can't talk like you actually watched the video and be specific in your comments relating to sites and artifacts shown in the video, please keep your comments to yourself. I really do get tired of banning everybody and think it's a sad commentary on our society that it is so difficult to find people able to carry on a conversation respectfully.......and if you go off on another tirade attacking me now, you go back on my auto-ban list. It does not bother me in the least to ban people who only want to disrupt and suppress my speech. 1
point
1
point
There was probably ten times more stuff written about Yeshua of Nazareth than the paltry collection of stories that made the final cut by the early church founders. Four measly gospels? pathetic. But the good news is that people like me who really have a hunger to know more about the prophet and philosopher Yeshua can find what are called apocryphal writings. some of them are as good as if not better than the gospel accounts, or Paul's Letters. (btw: most biblical scholars now agree that of the 13 epistles that were originally attributed to Paul only about five are now for sure confirmed as being his.) one of my favorite accounts of Jesus is the Gospel of Thomas, for example, which obviously did not make the Bible. Why you ask? because in it Jesus tells us that we too can be children of God and just as exalted as He was in God's eyes. So the church thought this threatened their power so they omitted Thomas' Gospel from the Canon. The true Jesus also believed in Reincarnation, since he most likely studied in India with Hindus during his "lost years." from ages of 14 to around 30 or so! a good 25 years where the Bible offers nothing about him. Why? I think we know. we call it censorship today. don't get me wrong. I am a Christian and a love the Bible and Jesus, I just am educated enough to know it is not the be all and end all of scriptures about God, and that it has its greatness and also its shortcomings. Much of the Torah for example is all but useless to us in today's modern West. GodBless. 1
point
it'd be grand if you could some up the points in the videos you keep citing as evidence. since as you've so clearly pointed out before "I have no right to live as a sinner outside hell" so by that notion my time outside of hell is very valuable and you're wasting it by thinking that I'd take the time to watch a video so I can refute it. - Cheers! |