CreateDebate


Debate Info

10
7
yes no
Debate Score:17
Arguments:18
Total Votes:17
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 yes (8)
 
 no (7)

Debate Creator

brandyking(15) pic



this house will pay citizens to house refugees

yes

Side Score: 10
VS.

no

Side Score: 7
1 point

job creation where people will earn money by keeping refugees not for free but all because they will be paid for accommodating refugees

Side: yes
KelvinSleaze(4) Disputed
1 point

so people will focus on earning more money rather than focusing on the well being of the refugees

Side: no
Antrim(1287) Disputed
2 points

No, people will concentrate on honing their skills and advancing their career thus contributing positively to society in which they live.

Europe is teeming with so called Muslim refugees many of whom were taken into the various countries at very early ages, such as the one who was admitted at 5 years of age and, along with other went on to machine gun to death some 183 young nightclubbers out enjoying themselves in Paris,France.

The line which Australia takes should be followed by all nations.

In Australia they're quarantined and, in the main kept in a place where they can do little or no harm to the people of the host nation.

It's sanctimonious bleeding hearts like you that have brought death and destruction the cities and towns of Europe, and so far, to a lesser extent, the U.S.A.

Side: yes
1 point

refugee camps are the way to go than housing them all because these assylum seekers are criminal so can we put that person to live with the populacy

Side: yes
1 point

yes we are putting our selves at risk than have them in camp

WE WANT THEM IN OUR COUNTRY NOT IN OUR HOMES

Side: yes
1 point

paying citizens to house refugees is the same as promoting refugees in an area as they will get to enjoy being taken care of by the citizens and the government at large

Side: no

I'm assuming you are talking about possible future Russian refugees?

Side: no
KelvinSleaze(4) Clarified
1 point

we are trying to consider refugees across the globe so future Russian refugees are included

Side: yes
1 point

Well by God, let's bring in a million Russian refugees that don't want to live under Putin anymore. They'll probably vote Conservative...

Side: yes
1 point

If a government is going to take in refugees (whether right or wrong) then the government needs to make the programs to assist with housing, food, jobs, etc. Paying private citizens to cohabitate with refugess does not get those refugees to stand on their own feet eventually and only serves as an incentive for private citizens to make a buck off of it. Taking in refugees should not be treated as the same equivalent as an international student exchange program.

Side: no
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
2 points

The government has programs in place to assist with housing , food , jobs ,etc. Does there need to more of these programs in place for the government to steal more taxpayer dollars ! Big Government that is what you Progressives are all about !!!!!!!!!!!

Side: yes
Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

I didn't say we should take them in, I said if a government does decide to take them in then paying ordinary citizens to house them is a bad idea. Pay attention.

Side: no
1 point

Looking at expenses,we are saying that it is better to pay citizens to provide residence for refugees rather than to set up refugee camps

Side: no