1. I don't make sense when I make sense of your nonsense. I'm saying that instead of "protecting" a fetus, which is not the state's property (and so not the state's responsibility), we should be getting people out of homeless shelters and ghettos, drug addicted bums off of the streets, and giving them a job or otherwise making these citizens of the state useful. Most of the people I meet from these places are addicted to something illegal, and they suffer for it, but also everyone around them suffers too. Many of the people I know hustle for a living, which means they create a commune in a household, they steal things that belong to the people around them, and sell/barter with these stolen things for drugs and extra cash. Some of them have food stamps that pay for everyone under the roof.
Some of these people could be redeemed instead of incarcerated as they are already good people stuck in a tough situation. Some are mentally ill, sure, but these people are in a sense, societies debts. Whether they are on the street, stealing, or in a prison, they are costing citizens pain and hardship. Now, this is what I mean by taking care of or protecting good grown people. Rather than being conservative by forcing people to spit out more children, doesn't it make more sense to help the ones that are already here!? CONSERVATIVES CONSERVE. Take what people we have now and help them out. It would cost less over an 18 year period and would increase our state's capital if they are successfully redeemed.
2. Right, they were babies and now they're tainted and there's no way to treat them like people anymore, I get your point. That doesn't mean I agree. People usually "chose" evil because they have to given their situation.
3. No.
lol
