Obviously, for reproductive purposes, sex hzs to be pleasurable. The question is therefore, why is the multi-orgasm so hard to achieve. Well, that may not have been an issue before circumsicion (full fore-skin helps a women hence "ribbed" condoms). Also, sex was probably a source of entertainment. With no TV to distract you, it's possible sexual partners did it a lot for a prolonged period of time. About it being "multi": why not? Singular makes less sense if its meant to produce pleasure, and its only singular in man because once it happens reproduction can begin (hence further orgasms are redundant for just one ejaculation).

Just because you can't do it Joe, doesn't mean no on can.

what the fuck is Joe tryna get at with this debate ? jeebs. lol.

Wasn't there, for a long time, scientific belief that the circumcision lead to a healthier sexual life for men? Because the forskin caught dirt and bacteria and what-not that was hard to remove (kinda like your wisdom teeth skin flaps) but was later disproved? And as for less pleasureable after being circumcised, WHAT? That doesn't make any sense to me. Foreskin or no foreskin it is still stretched out once a guy gets an erection, so how could it be that having a foreskin on the male is more pleasureable for the female?