Debate Info

Debate Score:52
Arguments:5
Total Votes:52
Show More Stats

Argument Tags

side graph
Show All Tags
 
 Nudity ftw (21)
 
 depends (5)
 
 Maintain the Power (5)
 
 depends if its private or public (4)
 
 natural (1)

Debate Creator

believeyoume(817) pic



The naked body: shameful or natural?

What are your thoughts on public nudity, naturism, et cetera?

http://www.clothesfree.com/


Add New Argument

Arguments Tagged As: depends [clear]
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

lol, YES! I'm sickened by their appearance, and I suggest they should always wear a mask in public because I find their faces quite offensive!

But seriously, I'm not 100% convinced seeing more naked old men in the locker room with old people spots and sacks that hang to their knees will ever make it any less disgusting. I'm not sure how everyone being naked would desensitize people to monstrosities such as these. Maybe I'm wrong, or maybe you're just weird for not being bothered for it, either way, I'm all for good looking naked people.

215 days ago | Tagged As: depends
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I disagree,

I think there is a difference between judging a person, and being disgusted by the way their body looks.

Some of my best friend are ugly ;)

216 days ago | Tagged As: depends
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

See MK's arguement too because he's right.

1. Naked is always natural.

2. But sometimes it's also shameful

and this has 0 to do with anything Puritan, there's a health issue here

So here are the naked rules:

1. No fat people. Fat is unnatural so keep your fat ass covered or quit eating like a pig.

2. Old people... especially men. You disgust everyone. Yes, even in the locker room. I don't care how straight I am, if your balls are swinging 3ft, and your cock looks like an inverted pen cap and you have old people spots bigger than my head on your ass, I'm going to notice, and I will vomit in my mouth.

3. Sasquash, you know who you are. Man has been walking the earth for hundreds of thousands of years, we've built homes, air conditioning, heaters, showers, and every kind of hair removing aparatus imaginable. There is no survival reason for you to maintain your rastafarian body dreads, they smell within a 10ft radius like burning sulfur and brimstone, they have god knows what clinging to them, you are not a cudly bear, you are a Middle Earth Troll and you need to either cover yourself or get some trimmers.

216 days ago | Tagged As: depends
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

LMAO!

Please, for the love of God, put a towel on! >.<

Dude, that's the most true thing you've ever said!

I swear I never gave a rat's ass about who was naked where or when until I started going to gyms after high school.

lol, these old guys are so grotesque!

It's not even about the nakedness, it's simply disturbing and they don't give a damn! Like they want us to not be able to eat for a week!

216 days ago | Tagged As: depends
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Ah Jeez,

In the Bible, Adam and Eve were naked, and were not made to wear clothes until they felt shame. The most common english translations are incorrect and would lead one to believe it was the nakedness that was bad, it was not.

There are quite a few interpretations of what this parable meant, most likely what it meant by "eating" the forbidden fruit, was non-baby making sex. They were doing it, perhaps during Eve's period? When pregnancy would have been unlikely? Maybe some oral, you know "eating"? Not sure they were that clever though. Unfortunately it's been translated so many times no one really knows, and the originals are lost to time.

At any rate, the idea behind the clothing in the Puritan sense, was that Adam was not able to control his hormones, and would be compelled, through no fault of his own, to mount his woman at every oportunity.

Which is why hardcore Old Testament religions like their women hidden under a mountain of clothes, barefoot, and pregnant at all times.

So it's basically based on sexism. Another in a long line of reasons why the Bible is a ridiculous source for a moral code.

Private nudity would most certainly not be okay according to this parable, even in a marriage, unless it was for the express purpose of baby making sex.

There's nothing in that parable that would lead one to believe it's even okay for a husband and wife to be naked together. That's just the Bible people picking and choosing what they like, or the furthest they think people will accept. Typical.

If one feels no shame in being naked, then there's nothing wrong with it. If someone doesn't like it, don't look, if some guy feels an uncontrollable urge to rape, buy a hooker.

"You mean jack-off right? haha, I mean buying a hooker is sinful... well so is jacking off, but hookers are worse!"

Wrong again Bible dude. "It is better to pour your seed on the belly of a prostitute, than to let when drop touch the earth."

Which means hookers > masterbation in god's eyes...

lmao,

but try to get the flock to accept that obvious interpretation,

pick and choose, pick and choose.

216 days ago | Tagged As: depends
Popular Debates: Webcam option for CreateDebate. Thoughts? Devil's Advocate: PCP should be legalized. Is an atheist a loyal American?



About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2010 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.